Cost-effectiveness of train-the-trainer versus expert consultation training models for implementing interpersonal psychotherapy in college mental health settings: evidence from a national cluster randomized trial.

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ramesh Raghavan, Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft, R Robinson Welch, Booil Jo, Enola K Proctor, G Terence Wilson, W Stewart Agras, Denise E Wilfley
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of train-the-trainer versus expert consultation training models for implementing interpersonal psychotherapy in college mental health settings: evidence from a national cluster randomized trial.","authors":"Ramesh Raghavan, Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft, R Robinson Welch, Booil Jo, Enola K Proctor, G Terence Wilson, W Stewart Agras, Denise E Wilfley","doi":"10.1186/s13012-024-01388-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study is a cost-effectiveness study of two implementation strategies designed to train therapists in college and university counseling centers to deliver interpersonal psychotherapy. Costs of implementing a train-the-trainer (TTT) strategy versus an expert consultation strategy were estimated, and their relative effects upon therapist outcomes were calculated and compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty four counseling centers were recruited across the United States. These centers were randomized to either a TTT (experimental) condition, in which an in-house therapist trained other center therapists, or an expert consultation condition, in which center therapists participated in a workshop and received 12 months of ongoing supervision. The main outcome was therapist fidelity (adherence and competence) to interpersonal psychotherapy, assessed via audio recordings of therapy sessions, and analyzed using linear mixed models. Costs of each condition were quantified using time-driven activity-based costing methods, and involved a costing survey administered to center directors, follow up interviews and validation checks, and comparison of time tracking logs of trainers in the expert condition. Mean costs to produce one therapist were obtained for each condition. The costs to produce equivalent improvements in therapist-level outcomes were then compared between the two conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean cost incurred by counseling centers to train one therapist using the TTT strategy was $3,407 (median = $3,077); mean cost to produce one trained therapist in the control condition was $2,055 (median = $1,932). Therapists in the TTT condition, on average, demonstrated a 0.043 higher adherence score compared to therapists in the control condition; however, this difference was not statistically significant. For the competence outcome, effect size for therapists in the TTT condition was in the large range (1.16; 95% CI: 0.85-1.46; p < .001), and therapists in this condition, on average, demonstrated a 0.073 higher competence score compared to those in the expert consultation condition (95% CI, 0.008-0.14; p = .03). Counseling centers that used the TTT model incurred $353 less in training costs to produce equivalent improvements in therapist competence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite its higher short run costs, the TTT implementation strategy produces greater increases in therapist competence when compared to expert consultation. Expanding resources to support this platform for service delivery can be an effective way to enhance the mental health care of young people seeking care in college and university counseling centers.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02079142.</p>","PeriodicalId":54995,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science","volume":"19 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11287912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01388-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study is a cost-effectiveness study of two implementation strategies designed to train therapists in college and university counseling centers to deliver interpersonal psychotherapy. Costs of implementing a train-the-trainer (TTT) strategy versus an expert consultation strategy were estimated, and their relative effects upon therapist outcomes were calculated and compared.

Methods: Twenty four counseling centers were recruited across the United States. These centers were randomized to either a TTT (experimental) condition, in which an in-house therapist trained other center therapists, or an expert consultation condition, in which center therapists participated in a workshop and received 12 months of ongoing supervision. The main outcome was therapist fidelity (adherence and competence) to interpersonal psychotherapy, assessed via audio recordings of therapy sessions, and analyzed using linear mixed models. Costs of each condition were quantified using time-driven activity-based costing methods, and involved a costing survey administered to center directors, follow up interviews and validation checks, and comparison of time tracking logs of trainers in the expert condition. Mean costs to produce one therapist were obtained for each condition. The costs to produce equivalent improvements in therapist-level outcomes were then compared between the two conditions.

Results: Mean cost incurred by counseling centers to train one therapist using the TTT strategy was $3,407 (median = $3,077); mean cost to produce one trained therapist in the control condition was $2,055 (median = $1,932). Therapists in the TTT condition, on average, demonstrated a 0.043 higher adherence score compared to therapists in the control condition; however, this difference was not statistically significant. For the competence outcome, effect size for therapists in the TTT condition was in the large range (1.16; 95% CI: 0.85-1.46; p < .001), and therapists in this condition, on average, demonstrated a 0.073 higher competence score compared to those in the expert consultation condition (95% CI, 0.008-0.14; p = .03). Counseling centers that used the TTT model incurred $353 less in training costs to produce equivalent improvements in therapist competence.

Conclusions: Despite its higher short run costs, the TTT implementation strategy produces greater increases in therapist competence when compared to expert consultation. Expanding resources to support this platform for service delivery can be an effective way to enhance the mental health care of young people seeking care in college and university counseling centers.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02079142.

在高校心理健康环境中实施人际心理疗法的培训师培训模式与专家咨询培训模式的成本效益:来自全国分组随机试验的证据。
研究背景本研究是一项成本效益研究,涉及两种旨在培训大专院校心理咨询中心治疗师进行人际心理治疗的实施策略。研究估算了培训培训师(TTT)策略和专家咨询策略的实施成本,并计算和比较了这两种策略对治疗师疗效的相对影响:方法:在全美招募了 24 家心理咨询中心。方法:在全美招募了 24 个心理咨询中心,将这些中心随机分为两种情况:一种是 TTT(实验)情况,即中心内部的治疗师培训其他中心的治疗师;另一种是专家咨询情况,即中心的治疗师参加研讨会并接受 12 个月的持续督导。主要结果是治疗师对人际心理治疗的忠诚度(坚持度和能力),通过治疗过程的录音进行评估,并使用线性混合模型进行分析。采用时间驱动的活动成本计算方法对每种条件下的成本进行量化,包括对中心主任进行成本调查、后续访谈和验证检查,以及比较专家条件下培训师的时间跟踪日志。得出了每种情况下培训一名治疗师的平均成本。然后比较了两种情况下治疗师水平结果的同等改善所需的成本:心理咨询中心使用 TTT 策略培训一名治疗师的平均成本为 3,407 美元(中位数=3,077 美元);对照组培训一名治疗师的平均成本为 2,055 美元(中位数=1,932 美元)。TTT 条件下的治疗师与对照条件下的治疗师相比,其依从性得分平均高出 0.043 分;但这一差异在统计学上并不显著。在能力结果方面,TTT 条件下治疗师的效应大小在较大范围内(1.16;95% CI:0.85-1.46;P 结论:TTT 条件下治疗师的效应大小在较大范围内(1.16;95% CI:0.85-1.46):尽管短期成本较高,但与专家咨询相比,TTT实施策略对治疗师能力的提高更大。扩大资源以支持这一服务平台,可以有效地提高大专院校心理咨询中心对寻求治疗的年轻人的心理健康护理水平:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02079142.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Implementation Science
Implementation Science 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Implementation Science is a leading journal committed to disseminating evidence on methods for integrating research findings into routine healthcare practice and policy. It offers a multidisciplinary platform for studying implementation strategies, encompassing their development, outcomes, economics, processes, and associated factors. The journal prioritizes rigorous studies and innovative, theory-based approaches, covering implementation science across various healthcare services and settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信