‘Twenty years of network meta-analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments’: A health technology assessment perspective

IF 5 2区生物学 Q1 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY

Research Synthesis Methods Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1002/jrsm.1740

Dan Jackson, Landan Zhang, Robert Hettle, Miranda Cooper

引用次数: 0

Abstract

We respond to some of the methodological issues raised in a recent review of network meta-analysis (NMA). We also provide a health technology developer's perspective and consider the future application of NMA to health technology assessment.

查看原文本刊更多论文

网络荟萃分析二十年：持续争议与最新发展"：卫生技术评估的视角。

我们对近期网络荟萃分析 (NMA) 综述中提出的一些方法论问题做出了回应。我们还提供了卫生技术开发人员的观点，并考虑了 NMA 在卫生技术评估中的未来应用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Research Synthesis Methods MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGYMULTID-MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES

CiteScore

16.90

自引率

3.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Research Synthesis Methods is a reputable, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on the development and dissemination of methods for conducting systematic research synthesis. Our aim is to advance the knowledge and application of research synthesis methods across various disciplines. Our journal provides a platform for the exchange of ideas and knowledge related to designing, conducting, analyzing, interpreting, reporting, and applying research synthesis. While research synthesis is commonly practiced in the health and social sciences, our journal also welcomes contributions from other fields to enrich the methodologies employed in research synthesis across scientific disciplines. By bridging different disciplines, we aim to foster collaboration and cross-fertilization of ideas, ultimately enhancing the quality and effectiveness of research synthesis methods. Whether you are a researcher, practitioner, or stakeholder involved in research synthesis, our journal strives to offer valuable insights and practical guidance for your work.