Limited Delamination Modifications to the Extended Deep Plane Rhytidectomy: An Anatomical Basis for Improved Outcomes.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Michael Roskies, Dominic Bray, Neil A Gordon, Alessandro Gualdi, L Mike Nayak, Ben Talei
{"title":"Limited Delamination Modifications to the Extended Deep Plane Rhytidectomy: An Anatomical Basis for Improved Outcomes.","authors":"Michael Roskies, Dominic Bray, Neil A Gordon, Alessandro Gualdi, L Mike Nayak, Ben Talei","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This study introduces variations of a limited delamination approach to the deep plane face- and necklift. <b>Objectives:</b> To report surgeons' perceptions of limited delamination deep plane rhytidectomy, define the anatomical basis to support these modifications, and report complication rates. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective multi-institutional chart review study of patients undergoing a modified classical deep plane face- and necklift. Surgeons' perception of outcomes and self-reported complications were collected. <b>Results:</b> In total, 3964 patients having undergone face- and necklift with six surgeons being included. Most patients were female (87.9%) with an age range of 31-83 years (mean 58 years). Most were primary procedures (2672/3964; 67.4%) with a median follow-up of 425 days (range 21-5470). Preliminary surgeon experience demonstrated increased ease of flap management, improved biomechanics, smaller perceived rates of skin discoloration, and telangiectasia of the skin and lower revisions rate (<i>n</i> = 11; 0.8%). Complication rates were low for hematoma (<i>n</i> = 24; 1.9%) and seroma requiring needle aspiration (<i>n</i> = 26; 2%) and minor infection (<i>n</i> = 18; 1.4%). <b>Conclusions:</b> A multicenter surgeon experience with the limited delamination extended deep plane rhytidectomy is based on anatomical evidence and demonstrates low complication rates and surgeon-perceived improved long-term outcomes. Prospective comparative outcomes of these evolving techniques are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study introduces variations of a limited delamination approach to the deep plane face- and necklift. Objectives: To report surgeons' perceptions of limited delamination deep plane rhytidectomy, define the anatomical basis to support these modifications, and report complication rates. Methods: This retrospective multi-institutional chart review study of patients undergoing a modified classical deep plane face- and necklift. Surgeons' perception of outcomes and self-reported complications were collected. Results: In total, 3964 patients having undergone face- and necklift with six surgeons being included. Most patients were female (87.9%) with an age range of 31-83 years (mean 58 years). Most were primary procedures (2672/3964; 67.4%) with a median follow-up of 425 days (range 21-5470). Preliminary surgeon experience demonstrated increased ease of flap management, improved biomechanics, smaller perceived rates of skin discoloration, and telangiectasia of the skin and lower revisions rate (n = 11; 0.8%). Complication rates were low for hematoma (n = 24; 1.9%) and seroma requiring needle aspiration (n = 26; 2%) and minor infection (n = 18; 1.4%). Conclusions: A multicenter surgeon experience with the limited delamination extended deep plane rhytidectomy is based on anatomical evidence and demonstrates low complication rates and surgeon-perceived improved long-term outcomes. Prospective comparative outcomes of these evolving techniques are warranted.

扩展深平面韵律切除术的有限分层修改:提高疗效的解剖学基础。
背景:本研究介绍了深平面面部和颈部拉皮手术中有限分层方法的变体。研究目的报告外科医生对有限分层深平面皱纹切除术的看法,确定支持这些修改的解剖学基础,并报告并发症发生率。方法:对接受改良经典深平面面部和颈部拉皮手术的患者进行多机构病历回顾性研究。研究还收集了外科医生对手术效果的看法和自我报告的并发症。研究结果共有 3964 名患者接受了面部和颈部拉皮手术,其中包括 6 名外科医生。大多数患者为女性(87.9%),年龄在 31-83 岁之间(平均 58 岁)。大多数是初次手术(2672/3964;67.4%),中位随访时间为 425 天(21-5470 天不等)。外科医生的初步经验表明,皮瓣管理更加简便,生物力学得到改善,皮肤变色和毛细血管扩张的发生率较低,翻修率较低(n = 11;0.8%)。血肿(24 例;1.9%)、需要针吸的血清肿(26 例;2%)和轻微感染(18 例;1.4%)的并发症发生率较低。结论多中心外科医生在解剖学证据的基础上对有限分层扩展深面韵膜切除术进行了体验,结果表明并发症发生率低,外科医生认为长期疗效有所改善。有必要对这些不断发展的技术进行前瞻性的结果比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
30.00%
发文量
159
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信