Validation of Bioelectrical Impedance Devices for the Determination of Body Fat Percentage in Firefighters.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Andrew R Jagim, Joel Luedke, Jacob L Erickson, Jennifer B Fields, Margaret T Jones
{"title":"Validation of Bioelectrical Impedance Devices for the Determination of Body Fat Percentage in Firefighters.","authors":"Andrew R Jagim, Joel Luedke, Jacob L Erickson, Jennifer B Fields, Margaret T Jones","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000004809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Jagim, AR, Luedke, J, Erickson, JL, Fields, JB, and Jones, MT. Validation of bioelectrical impedance devices for the determination of body fat percentage in firefighters. J Strength Cond Res 38(8): e448-e453, 2024-To cross-validate bioelectrical impedance devices for the determination of body fat percentage (BF%) in firefighters. Twenty-eight structural firefighters were evaluated (female, n = 2; male, n = 26 [mean ± SD] age: 38.2 ± 8.3 years; height: 180.2 ± 7.5 cm; body mass: 86.7 ± 20.8 kg; body mass index: 25.8 ± 7.8 kg·m-2) using multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MFBIA) hand-to-foot device, and single-frequency BIA foot scale (F2FBIA), and a single-frequency handheld BIA device (HHBIA). Dual X-ray absorptiometry served as the criterion. Validity metrics were examined to establish each method's performance. Body fat % values produced by MFBIA (r = 0.913), F2FBIA (r = 0.695), and HHBIA (r = 0.876) were strongly associated (p < 0.001) with criterion BF% measures. However, MFBIA, F2FBIA, and HHBIA all significantly (p < 0.001) underestimated BF% when compared with the criterion measure. Constant error ranged between 4.0 and 5.5% across all BIA devices. Despite strong associations between the BIA devices included in the current study and the criterion measure, all BIA devices underestimated BF%, which resulted in an overestimation of fat-free mass. In addition, proportional bias was observed in which BF% was overestimated at lower values and underestimated at higher values.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004809","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Jagim, AR, Luedke, J, Erickson, JL, Fields, JB, and Jones, MT. Validation of bioelectrical impedance devices for the determination of body fat percentage in firefighters. J Strength Cond Res 38(8): e448-e453, 2024-To cross-validate bioelectrical impedance devices for the determination of body fat percentage (BF%) in firefighters. Twenty-eight structural firefighters were evaluated (female, n = 2; male, n = 26 [mean ± SD] age: 38.2 ± 8.3 years; height: 180.2 ± 7.5 cm; body mass: 86.7 ± 20.8 kg; body mass index: 25.8 ± 7.8 kg·m-2) using multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MFBIA) hand-to-foot device, and single-frequency BIA foot scale (F2FBIA), and a single-frequency handheld BIA device (HHBIA). Dual X-ray absorptiometry served as the criterion. Validity metrics were examined to establish each method's performance. Body fat % values produced by MFBIA (r = 0.913), F2FBIA (r = 0.695), and HHBIA (r = 0.876) were strongly associated (p < 0.001) with criterion BF% measures. However, MFBIA, F2FBIA, and HHBIA all significantly (p < 0.001) underestimated BF% when compared with the criterion measure. Constant error ranged between 4.0 and 5.5% across all BIA devices. Despite strong associations between the BIA devices included in the current study and the criterion measure, all BIA devices underestimated BF%, which resulted in an overestimation of fat-free mass. In addition, proportional bias was observed in which BF% was overestimated at lower values and underestimated at higher values.

验证用于测定消防员体脂百分比的生物电阻抗设备。
摘要:Jagim、AR、Luedke、J、Erickson、JL、Fields、JB 和 Jones、MT。用于测定消防员体脂百分比的生物电阻抗装置的验证。J Strength Cond Res 38(8): e448-e453, 2024-交叉验证生物电阻抗设备用于测定消防员的体脂率(BF%)。对 28 名结构型消防员进行了评估(女性,n = 2;男性,n = 26 [平均值 ± SD] 年龄:38.2 ± 8.3 岁;身高:180.2 ± 7.5 厘米;体重:86.7 ± 20.8 千克;体重指数:25.8 ± 7.8 千克:研究人员使用多频生物电阻抗分析(MFBIA)手到脚装置、单频 BIA 脚秤(F2FBIA)和单频手持式 BIA 装置(HHBIA),测量了所有受试者的体重(25.8 ± 7.8 kg-m-2)。双 X 射线吸收测量法作为标准。对每种方法的有效性指标进行了检验,以确定每种方法的性能。MFBIA(r = 0.913)、F2FBIA(r = 0.695)和 HHBIA(r = 0.876)产生的体脂率值与标准体脂率测量值密切相关(p < 0.001)。但是,与标准测量值相比,MFBIA、F2FBIA 和 HHBIA 都明显低估了 BF%(p < 0.001)。所有 BIA 设备的恒定误差在 4.0% 到 5.5% 之间。尽管当前研究中的 BIA 设备与标准测量值之间存在很强的关联,但所有 BIA 设备都低估了 BF%,从而导致高估了去脂质量。此外,还观察到比例偏差,即 BF% 值较低时被高估,而值较高时被低估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信