Learning cardiac embryology on YouTube-What videos are there to view?

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Ruth Mathew, Niveta Ramakrishnan, Fiona Boland, Teresa Pawlikowska, Jane C Holland
{"title":"Learning cardiac embryology on YouTube-What videos are there to view?","authors":"Ruth Mathew, Niveta Ramakrishnan, Fiona Boland, Teresa Pawlikowska, Jane C Holland","doi":"10.1002/ase.2467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In modern medical curricula, embryology is typically taught through lectures, with a few institutions providing tutorials. The use of 3-D videos or animations enables students to study these embryological structures and how they change with time. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of cardiac embryology videos available on YouTube. A systematic literature review regarding the use of YouTube in teaching or learning cardiac embryology identified no papers that examined this specific question, and next, a systematic search of YouTube was performed. A total of 1200 cardiac embryology videos were retrieved using 12 specific search terms, with 370 videos retrieved under two or more search terms and excluded. A further 511 videos were excluded under additional, specific criteria. The remaining 319 videos were evaluated with the YouTube Video Assessment Criteria (UTvAC), with 121 rated as \"useful.\" Videos on YouTube are uploaded with a wide audience in mind, from children to cardiologists, and content control is imperfect. Multiple videos were identified as duplicates of videos from original channels, typically without attribution. While 49 videos showed operations or human material, none contained an ethical statement regarding consent, and only 10 of these included an age restriction or graphical advisory. While there are useful videos for medical students studying cardiac embryology on YouTube, intuitive search strategies will also identify many with irrelevant content and of variable quality. Digital competence and search strategies are not innate skills, so educators should teach students to assess information so as to avoid overload or \"filter failure.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2467","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In modern medical curricula, embryology is typically taught through lectures, with a few institutions providing tutorials. The use of 3-D videos or animations enables students to study these embryological structures and how they change with time. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of cardiac embryology videos available on YouTube. A systematic literature review regarding the use of YouTube in teaching or learning cardiac embryology identified no papers that examined this specific question, and next, a systematic search of YouTube was performed. A total of 1200 cardiac embryology videos were retrieved using 12 specific search terms, with 370 videos retrieved under two or more search terms and excluded. A further 511 videos were excluded under additional, specific criteria. The remaining 319 videos were evaluated with the YouTube Video Assessment Criteria (UTvAC), with 121 rated as "useful." Videos on YouTube are uploaded with a wide audience in mind, from children to cardiologists, and content control is imperfect. Multiple videos were identified as duplicates of videos from original channels, typically without attribution. While 49 videos showed operations or human material, none contained an ethical statement regarding consent, and only 10 of these included an age restriction or graphical advisory. While there are useful videos for medical students studying cardiac embryology on YouTube, intuitive search strategies will also identify many with irrelevant content and of variable quality. Digital competence and search strategies are not innate skills, so educators should teach students to assess information so as to avoid overload or "filter failure."

在 YouTube 上学习心脏胚胎学--有哪些视频可供观看?
在现代医学课程中,胚胎学通常是通过讲座教授的,也有少数院校提供教程。使用三维视频或动画可以让学生研究这些胚胎结构以及它们如何随时间发生变化。本研究旨在评估 YouTube 上提供的心脏胚胎学视频的质量。通过对 YouTube 在心脏胚胎学教学中的应用进行系统的文献综述,发现没有论文对这一特定问题进行研究,因此对 YouTube 进行了系统搜索。使用 12 个特定搜索词共检索到 1200 个心脏胚胎学视频,其中有 370 个视频在两个或多个搜索词下被检索到并排除在外。另有 511 个视频根据其他特定标准被排除。根据 YouTube 视频评估标准 (UTvAC) 对剩余的 319 部视频进行了评估,其中 121 部被评为 "有用"。YouTube 上上传的视频受众广泛,从儿童到心脏病专家都有,内容控制并不完善。有多个视频被认定为原始频道视频的重复,通常没有注明出处。虽然有 49 个视频展示了手术或人体材料,但没有一个视频包含有关同意的伦理声明,其中只有 10 个视频包含年龄限制或图形提示。虽然 YouTube 上有很多对医学生学习心脏胚胎学有用的视频,但直观的搜索策略也会发现很多内容无关、质量参差不齐的视频。数字能力和搜索策略并不是与生俱来的技能,因此教育者应教会学生评估信息,以避免信息过载或 "过滤失败"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信