Advancing Environmental Sustainability: A Study on Energy and Resource Efficiency through Technological Innovation in China

IF 2.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Gang Du, Dingwen Si, Maaz Ahmad, Xiao Gu
{"title":"Advancing Environmental Sustainability: A Study on Energy and Resource Efficiency through Technological Innovation in China","authors":"Gang Du, Dingwen Si, Maaz Ahmad, Xiao Gu","doi":"10.1007/s41742-024-00645-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>AbstractSection</span> Abstract <p>Energy efficiency leads to the sustainable utilization of energy resources by adopting efficient technology, which is a decisive factor for environmental sustainability. This study proposed both renewable and non-renewable energy types to measure energy efficiency and environmental sustainability in China. Furthermore, this study adds technology as an auxiliary factor for energy efficiency and sustainability to resource efficiency. Therefore, the study espouses the N-ARDL technique for asymmetric short and long run positive–negative shocks from 1985 to 2020. The asymmetric outcomes indicate that the positive and negative effects of economic growth and positive technological innovation shocks assist in mitigating carbon secretions, whereas technological innovation is not environmentally efficient during negative shocks. Simultaneously, energy efficiency is measured using both renewable and non-renewable energy factors. The positive shock in coal consumption is alarming for environmental efficiency, whereas its negative shock efficiently mitigates carbon secretions and assists environmental sustainability. However, both positive and negative shocks related to renewable energy are environmentally friendly and support environmental efficiency in China. Therefore, renewable energy is considered an energy-efficient source during asymmetric shocks, whereas non-renewable energy is only efficient during negative shocks, suggesting the sustainable utilization of coal resources. Furthermore, resource rents are inefficient during positive shocks and cause environmental deprivation, whereas they are environmentally efficient during negative shocks. These findings suggest that the Chinese government should take steps to improve environmental monitoring and enhance transparency. Further, Fintech projects under green growth and energy initiatives need further improvements to gain energy as well as resource and environmental efficiency.</p>\n<span>AbstractSection</span> Highlights <ul>\n<li>\n<p>Resource rents during negative shock is considered as resource-efficient and environmentally efficient.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Energy efficiency is measured by both renewable and non-renewable energy factors.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>The positive shock in coal consumption is alarming for environmental efficiency, while its negative shock is efficiently mitigating carbon secretions.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Renewable energy’s is considered an energy-efficient source and both positive and negative shocks are environmental-led and support environmental efficiency in China.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Findings illustrate that positive-negative effect of economic growth and positive technological innovation shock assist in mitigating carbon secretions.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<span>AbstractSection</span> Graphical Abstract ","PeriodicalId":14121,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-024-00645-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractSection Abstract

Energy efficiency leads to the sustainable utilization of energy resources by adopting efficient technology, which is a decisive factor for environmental sustainability. This study proposed both renewable and non-renewable energy types to measure energy efficiency and environmental sustainability in China. Furthermore, this study adds technology as an auxiliary factor for energy efficiency and sustainability to resource efficiency. Therefore, the study espouses the N-ARDL technique for asymmetric short and long run positive–negative shocks from 1985 to 2020. The asymmetric outcomes indicate that the positive and negative effects of economic growth and positive technological innovation shocks assist in mitigating carbon secretions, whereas technological innovation is not environmentally efficient during negative shocks. Simultaneously, energy efficiency is measured using both renewable and non-renewable energy factors. The positive shock in coal consumption is alarming for environmental efficiency, whereas its negative shock efficiently mitigates carbon secretions and assists environmental sustainability. However, both positive and negative shocks related to renewable energy are environmentally friendly and support environmental efficiency in China. Therefore, renewable energy is considered an energy-efficient source during asymmetric shocks, whereas non-renewable energy is only efficient during negative shocks, suggesting the sustainable utilization of coal resources. Furthermore, resource rents are inefficient during positive shocks and cause environmental deprivation, whereas they are environmentally efficient during negative shocks. These findings suggest that the Chinese government should take steps to improve environmental monitoring and enhance transparency. Further, Fintech projects under green growth and energy initiatives need further improvements to gain energy as well as resource and environmental efficiency.

AbstractSection Highlights
  • Resource rents during negative shock is considered as resource-efficient and environmentally efficient.

  • Energy efficiency is measured by both renewable and non-renewable energy factors.

  • The positive shock in coal consumption is alarming for environmental efficiency, while its negative shock is efficiently mitigating carbon secretions.

  • Renewable energy’s is considered an energy-efficient source and both positive and negative shocks are environmental-led and support environmental efficiency in China.

  • Findings illustrate that positive-negative effect of economic growth and positive technological innovation shock assist in mitigating carbon secretions.

AbstractSection Graphical Abstract

Abstract Image

推进环境可持续性:中国通过技术创新提高能源和资源效率的研究
摘要 能源效率是指通过采用高效技术实现能源资源的可持续利用,是环境可持续发展的决定性因素。本研究提出了可再生能源和不可再生能源两种类型来衡量中国的能源效率和环境可持续性。此外,本研究在资源效率的基础上,增加了技术作为能源效率和可持续发展的辅助因素。因此,本研究采用 N-ARDL 技术对 1985 年至 2020 年的非对称短期和长期正负冲击进行分析。非对称结果表明,经济增长的正负效应和技术创新的正向冲击有助于减少碳排放,而技术创新在负向冲击中并不具有环境效益。同时,能源效率是利用可再生能源和不可再生能源因素来衡量的。煤炭消费的正向冲击对环境效率的影响令人担忧,而其负向冲击则能有效缓解碳分泌,有助于环境的可持续发展。然而,与可再生能源相关的正向和负向冲击对环境都是友好的,有助于提高中国的环境效率。因此,在非对称冲击下,可再生能源被认为是一种高效能源,而不可再生能源只有在负冲击下才有效,这表明煤炭资源的可持续利用。此外,资源租金在正向冲击时是低效的,会造成环境匮乏,而在负向冲击时则是环境高效的。这些研究结果表明,中国政府应采取措施加强环境监测,提高透明度。此外,绿色增长和能源倡议下的金融科技项目需要进一步改进,以获得能源以及资源和环境效率。 摘要 本节要点 在负向冲击期间,资源租金被视为资源效率和环境效率。煤炭消费的正向冲击对环境效率具有警示作用,而其负向冲击则可有效缓解碳排放。可再生能源被认为是高能效的能源,正向和负向冲击均以环境为导向,并支持中国的环境效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research is a multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of environment. In pursuit of these, environmentalist disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. International Journal of Environmental Research publishes original research papers, research notes and reviews across the broad field of environment. These include but are not limited to environmental science, environmental engineering, environmental management and planning and environmental design, urban and regional landscape design and natural disaster management. Thus high quality research papers or reviews dealing with any aspect of environment are welcomed. Papers may be theoretical, interpretative or experimental.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信