Threatened stick-nest rats preferentially eat invasive boxthorn rather than native vegetation on Australia’s Reevesby Island

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Annie A. Kraehe, Vera Weisbecker, Robert R. Hill, Kathryn E. Hill
{"title":"Threatened stick-nest rats preferentially eat invasive boxthorn rather than native vegetation on Australia’s Reevesby Island","authors":"Annie A. Kraehe, Vera Weisbecker, Robert R. Hill, Kathryn E. Hill","doi":"10.1071/wr23140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Context</strong><p>The incorporation of invasive plants into novel ecosystems often has negative effects, but it can also sometimes enhance ecosystem function. The threatened native rodent species <i>Leporillus conditor</i> (greater stick-nest rat) is extinct on the Australian mainland and now lives primarily on small islands off the coast of southern Australia. Many of these are degraded novel ecosystems invaded by African boxthorn (<i>Lycium ferocissimum</i>), a weed of national significance. However, <i>L. conditor</i> does not appear to be negatively affected by the presence of boxthorn, raising the question of how the two species co-exist.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>To understand how <i>L. conditor</i> uses African boxthorn, we evaluated dietary composition of <i>L. conditor</i> on parts of Reevesby Island by comparing consumption of invasive boxthorn with that of native vegetation.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>We identified three key vegetation types on the centre of the island and used point-intercept vegetation surveys to estimate relative availability of plant species in each. We then used micro-histological faecal analysis to estimate the proportions of each species in the diet of <i>L. conditor</i>, and quantified plant species selection by using selection ratios (use/availability).</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>Qualitative evidence of <i>L. conditor</i> activity suggested that it was mostly confined to vegetation with greater abundance of boxthorn than the other vegetation types (13.5%, compared with 5.7% total sampled vegetation). Furthermore, 51.7% of the faecal plant content and 11.8% of total sampled vegetation was African boxthorn, resulting in a selection ration for boxthorn of 4.4. Native species that appeared to be favoured food sources of <i>L. conditor</i> included <i>Olearia axillaris</i>, <i>Myoporum insulare</i> and <i>Enchylaena tomentosa</i>.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>Stick-nest rats of Reevesby Island demonstrate a clear selection for African boxthorn, both in terms of diet (tested quantitatively) and nesting (from previous research and our field observations).</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>The strong selection of stick-nest rats for a declared noxious weed as its main food source and persistence of stick-nest rats on Reevesby Island require consideration with regards to vegetation management on islands where <i>L. conditor</i> occurs. More broadly, it highlights that some elements of novel ecosystems may have unexpected positive impacts on parts of original ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/wr23140","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

The incorporation of invasive plants into novel ecosystems often has negative effects, but it can also sometimes enhance ecosystem function. The threatened native rodent species Leporillus conditor (greater stick-nest rat) is extinct on the Australian mainland and now lives primarily on small islands off the coast of southern Australia. Many of these are degraded novel ecosystems invaded by African boxthorn (Lycium ferocissimum), a weed of national significance. However, L. conditor does not appear to be negatively affected by the presence of boxthorn, raising the question of how the two species co-exist.

Aims

To understand how L. conditor uses African boxthorn, we evaluated dietary composition of L. conditor on parts of Reevesby Island by comparing consumption of invasive boxthorn with that of native vegetation.

Methods

We identified three key vegetation types on the centre of the island and used point-intercept vegetation surveys to estimate relative availability of plant species in each. We then used micro-histological faecal analysis to estimate the proportions of each species in the diet of L. conditor, and quantified plant species selection by using selection ratios (use/availability).

Key results

Qualitative evidence of L. conditor activity suggested that it was mostly confined to vegetation with greater abundance of boxthorn than the other vegetation types (13.5%, compared with 5.7% total sampled vegetation). Furthermore, 51.7% of the faecal plant content and 11.8% of total sampled vegetation was African boxthorn, resulting in a selection ration for boxthorn of 4.4. Native species that appeared to be favoured food sources of L. conditor included Olearia axillaris, Myoporum insulare and Enchylaena tomentosa.

Conclusions

Stick-nest rats of Reevesby Island demonstrate a clear selection for African boxthorn, both in terms of diet (tested quantitatively) and nesting (from previous research and our field observations).

Implications

The strong selection of stick-nest rats for a declared noxious weed as its main food source and persistence of stick-nest rats on Reevesby Island require consideration with regards to vegetation management on islands where L. conditor occurs. More broadly, it highlights that some elements of novel ecosystems may have unexpected positive impacts on parts of original ecosystems.

澳大利亚里维斯比岛的濒危粘巢鼠更喜欢吃入侵的黄刺玫而不是本地植被
背景入侵植物进入新的生态系统往往会产生负面影响,但有时也会增强生态系统的功能。濒临灭绝的本地啮齿类物种大粘鼠(Leporillus conditor)已在澳大利亚大陆灭绝,目前主要生活在澳大利亚南部沿海的小岛上。其中许多岛屿的新生态系统已经退化,受到非洲黄荆树(Lycium ferocissimum)的入侵,而非洲黄荆树是一种具有国家意义的杂草。然而,L. conditor 似乎并没有受到大黄棘的负面影响,这就提出了这两个物种如何共存的问题。目的为了了解秃头翁如何利用非洲黄杨,我们通过比较入侵黄杨与本地植被的消耗量,评估了秃头翁在里夫斯比岛部分地区的食物组成。方法我们确定了该岛中心的三种主要植被类型,并使用点拦截植被调查来估计每种植被中植物物种的相对可用性。然后,我们使用微观组织学粪便分析法估算了每种物种在L. conditor食物中所占的比例,并使用选择比率(使用/可用性)量化了植物物种的选择。主要结果有定量证据表明,L. conditor 的活动主要局限于黄箱棘丰度高于其他植被类型的植被(13.5%,而取样植被的总丰度为 5.7%)。此外,51.7%的粪便植物含量和 11.8%的取样植被总量是非洲黄杨,因此非洲黄杨的选择率为 4.4。似乎是 L. conditor 首选食物来源的本地物种包括 Olearia axillaris、Myoporum insulare 和 Enchylaena tomentosa。结论里夫斯比岛的粘巢鼠在饮食(定量测试)和筑巢(根据以前的研究和我们的实地观察)方面都显示出对非洲黄荆的明显选择。意义粘鼠对一种已被宣布为有害杂草的主要食物来源的强烈选择,以及粘鼠在里夫斯比岛上的持续存在,都需要在有 L. conditor 生长的岛屿上进行植被管理时加以考虑。从更广泛的意义上讲,它强调了新生态系统的某些要素可能会对原始生态系统的某些部分产生意想不到的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信