Paradigmatic reflections in cross-cultural management to make sense of a VUCA world

IF 2.4 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Henriett Primecz
{"title":"Paradigmatic reflections in cross-cultural management to make sense of a VUCA world","authors":"Henriett Primecz","doi":"10.1108/ijoa-09-2023-4001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to investigate the concept of VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity) in the field of cross-cultural management.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The related literature has been analysed from various paradigmatic lenses.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>As the VUCA world concept originates from business circles, several key articles were published in non-academic journals. Two distinct groups of publications can be identified: consulting literature and academic literature on the VUCA world. While both consulting literature and academic literature about the VUCA world can be associated with functionalism, alternative research paradigms can easily accommodate new studies in connection with the VUCA world: interpretive, critical and postmodern works would fit the features of the VUCA world, along with multi-paradigm studies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>It is advisable to investigate emergent contemporary issues, often labelled VUCA, according to multiple paradigms and to conduct multi-paradigmatic research.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>While consulting literature on the VUCA world implicitly assumes functionalist paradigms, academic literature might provide alternative assumptions. Interpretative, critical and postmodern paradigms more accurately address the issues raised by VUCA.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47017,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Organizational Analysis","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Organizational Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-09-2023-4001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to investigate the concept of VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity) in the field of cross-cultural management.

Design/methodology/approach

The related literature has been analysed from various paradigmatic lenses.

Findings

As the VUCA world concept originates from business circles, several key articles were published in non-academic journals. Two distinct groups of publications can be identified: consulting literature and academic literature on the VUCA world. While both consulting literature and academic literature about the VUCA world can be associated with functionalism, alternative research paradigms can easily accommodate new studies in connection with the VUCA world: interpretive, critical and postmodern works would fit the features of the VUCA world, along with multi-paradigm studies.

Research limitations/implications

It is advisable to investigate emergent contemporary issues, often labelled VUCA, according to multiple paradigms and to conduct multi-paradigmatic research.

Originality/value

While consulting literature on the VUCA world implicitly assumes functionalist paradigms, academic literature might provide alternative assumptions. Interpretative, critical and postmodern paradigms more accurately address the issues raised by VUCA.

跨文化管理中的范式反思,了解 VUCA 世界
目的 本文旨在研究跨文化管理领域的 VUCA(波动性、不确定性、复杂性和模糊性)概念。可以确定两类不同的出版物:关于 VUCA 世界的咨询文献和学术文献。虽然有关 VUCA 世界的咨询文献和学术文献都可以与功能主义联系起来,但其他研究范式也很容易容纳与 VUCA 世界有关的新研究:解释性、批判性和后现代作品以及多范式研究都符合 VUCA 世界的特征。研究局限性/启示根据多种范式研究当代新出现的问题(通常被称为 VUCA)并开展多范式研究是明智之举。原创性/价值虽然有关 VUCA 世界的咨询文献隐含着功能主义范式的假设,但学术文献可以提供其他假设。解释性、批判性和后现代范式能更准确地解决 VUCA 带来的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: The IJOA welcomes papers that draw on, but not exclusively: ■Organization theory ■Organization behaviour ■Organization development ■Organizational learning ■Strategic and change management ■People in organizational contexts including human resource management and human resource development ■Business and its interrelationship with society ■Ethics and morals, spirituality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信