Dos & Don’ts in Measuring Illuminance With Smartphones

IF 0.7 Q4 ERGONOMICS
Roberto Germán Rodriguez, Valeria Paviglianiti, Clarisa Dumit, Andrea Pattini
{"title":"Dos & Don’ts in Measuring Illuminance With Smartphones","authors":"Roberto Germán Rodriguez, Valeria Paviglianiti, Clarisa Dumit, Andrea Pattini","doi":"10.1177/10648046241263631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We explored the reliability of smartphones for measuring illuminance and discussed their use on occupational lighting assessments. In a 20–1000 lux range, we compared the illuminance readings from three Android applications on two smartphones versus a calibrated illuminance meter, and proposed seven calibration criteria. Mean non-calibrated smartphone measurements ranged between 28.36% and 37.58% above the reference illuminance. Two calibration criteria stood out: (i) single correction factor at the mean illuminance level (relative difference = 0.84%); (ii) power function (relative difference = −0.17%). We can state that properly calibrated smartphones might replace a low-end illuminance meter, and provide practical tips for measuring illuminance with smartphones.","PeriodicalId":44407,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics in Design","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics in Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10648046241263631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We explored the reliability of smartphones for measuring illuminance and discussed their use on occupational lighting assessments. In a 20–1000 lux range, we compared the illuminance readings from three Android applications on two smartphones versus a calibrated illuminance meter, and proposed seven calibration criteria. Mean non-calibrated smartphone measurements ranged between 28.36% and 37.58% above the reference illuminance. Two calibration criteria stood out: (i) single correction factor at the mean illuminance level (relative difference = 0.84%); (ii) power function (relative difference = −0.17%). We can state that properly calibrated smartphones might replace a low-end illuminance meter, and provide practical tips for measuring illuminance with smartphones.
使用智能手机测量照度的注意事项和注意事项
我们探讨了智能手机测量照度的可靠性,并讨论了它们在职业照明评估中的应用。在 20-1000 勒克斯范围内,我们比较了两部智能手机上三个安卓应用程序与校准照度计的照度读数,并提出了七个校准标准。未经校准的智能手机测量值平均比参考照度高出 28.36% 到 37.58%。有两个校准标准比较突出:(i) 平均照度水平的单一校正系数(相对差异 = 0.84%);(ii) 功率函数(相对差异 = -0.17%)。我们可以说,经过适当校准的智能手机可以取代低端照度计,并提供了使用智能手机测量照度的实用技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ergonomics in Design
Ergonomics in Design ERGONOMICS-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications is intended to serve the needs of practicing human factors/ergonomics professionals who are concerned with the usability of products, systems, tools, and environments. It provides up-to-date demonstrations of the importance of HF/E principles in design and implementation. Articles, case studies, anecdotes, debates, and interviews focus on the way in which HF/E research and methods are applied in the design, development, prototyping, test and evaluation, training, and manufacturing processes of a product or system.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信