Paraspinal Muscle Stiffness during Hamstring Exercise Using Shear-Wave Elastography

IF 2.2 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Sports Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.3390/sports12080199
Eleftherios Kellis, Afxentios Kekelekis, Eleni E. Drakonaki
{"title":"Paraspinal Muscle Stiffness during Hamstring Exercise Using Shear-Wave Elastography","authors":"Eleftherios Kellis, Afxentios Kekelekis, Eleni E. Drakonaki","doi":"10.3390/sports12080199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soccer teams integrate specific exercises into their typical workout programs for injury prevention. This study examined the effects of hamstring exercise on paraspinal and hamstring stiffness. These findings can inform training and rehabilitation programs to improve muscle health and prevent injuries. Fifteen young, healthy males performed passive and active (submaximal) knee flexion efforts from 0°, 45°, to 90° angle of knee flexion from the prone position. Using shear-wave elastography (SWE) and surface electromyography, we measured the elastic modulus and root mean square (RMS) signal of the erector spinae (ES), multifidus (MF), semitendinosus (ST), and semimembranosus (SM) during different knee flexion angles. Passive SWE modulus at 0° was 12.44 ± 4.45 kPa (ES), 13.35 ± 6.12 kPa (MF), 22.01 ± 4.68 kPa (ST), and 21.57 ± 5.22 kPa (SM) and it was greater (p < 0.05) compared to 45° and 90°. The corresponding values during knee flexion contractions at 0° increased to 18.99 ± 6.11 kPa (ES), 20.65 ± 11.31 kPa (MF), 71.21 ± 13.88 kPa (ST), and 70.20 ± 14.29 kPa (SM) and did not differ between angles (p > 0.05). Compared to rest, the relative increase in the SWE modulus during active contraction had a median value (interquartile range) ranging from 68.11 (86.29) to 101.69 (54.33)% for the paraspinal muscles and it was moderately to strongly correlated (r > 0.672) with the corresponding increase of the hamstring muscles [ranging from 225.94 (114.72) to 463.16 (185.16)%]. The RMS signal was greater during active compared to passive conditions, and it was lower at 90° compared to 45° (for SM/ST) and 0° (for all muscles). The association between paraspinal and hamstring passive muscle stiffness indicates a potential transmission of forces through myofascial connections between the lumbar spine and the lower limbs. In this laboratory setting, hamstring exercises affected the stiffness of the paraspinal muscles.","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12080199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soccer teams integrate specific exercises into their typical workout programs for injury prevention. This study examined the effects of hamstring exercise on paraspinal and hamstring stiffness. These findings can inform training and rehabilitation programs to improve muscle health and prevent injuries. Fifteen young, healthy males performed passive and active (submaximal) knee flexion efforts from 0°, 45°, to 90° angle of knee flexion from the prone position. Using shear-wave elastography (SWE) and surface electromyography, we measured the elastic modulus and root mean square (RMS) signal of the erector spinae (ES), multifidus (MF), semitendinosus (ST), and semimembranosus (SM) during different knee flexion angles. Passive SWE modulus at 0° was 12.44 ± 4.45 kPa (ES), 13.35 ± 6.12 kPa (MF), 22.01 ± 4.68 kPa (ST), and 21.57 ± 5.22 kPa (SM) and it was greater (p < 0.05) compared to 45° and 90°. The corresponding values during knee flexion contractions at 0° increased to 18.99 ± 6.11 kPa (ES), 20.65 ± 11.31 kPa (MF), 71.21 ± 13.88 kPa (ST), and 70.20 ± 14.29 kPa (SM) and did not differ between angles (p > 0.05). Compared to rest, the relative increase in the SWE modulus during active contraction had a median value (interquartile range) ranging from 68.11 (86.29) to 101.69 (54.33)% for the paraspinal muscles and it was moderately to strongly correlated (r > 0.672) with the corresponding increase of the hamstring muscles [ranging from 225.94 (114.72) to 463.16 (185.16)%]. The RMS signal was greater during active compared to passive conditions, and it was lower at 90° compared to 45° (for SM/ST) and 0° (for all muscles). The association between paraspinal and hamstring passive muscle stiffness indicates a potential transmission of forces through myofascial connections between the lumbar spine and the lower limbs. In this laboratory setting, hamstring exercises affected the stiffness of the paraspinal muscles.
利用剪切波弹性成像技术测量腘绳肌运动时脊柱旁肌肉的僵硬度
足球队在典型的锻炼计划中加入了特定的运动,以预防受伤。本研究探讨了腿筋锻炼对脊柱旁和腿筋僵硬的影响。这些发现可为训练和康复计划提供参考,从而改善肌肉健康并预防受伤。15 名年轻、健康的男性从俯卧位开始,分别从膝关节屈曲 0°、45° 到 90°角进行了被动和主动(亚极限)膝关节屈曲运动。通过剪切波弹性成像(SWE)和表面肌电图,我们测量了不同屈膝角度下竖脊肌(ES)、多股肌(MF)、半腱肌(ST)和半膜肌(SM)的弹性模量和均方根(RMS)信号。0° 时的被动 SWE 模量为 12.44 ± 4.45 kPa(ES)、13.35 ± 6.12 kPa(MF)、22.01 ± 4.68 kPa(ST)和 21.57 ± 5.22 kPa(SM),与 45° 和 90° 时相比更大(P < 0.05)。膝关节屈曲收缩 0° 时的相应值分别增至 18.99 ± 6.11 kPa (ES)、20.65 ± 11.31 kPa (MF)、71.21 ± 13.88 kPa (ST) 和 70.20 ± 14.29 kPa (SM),且不同角度之间无差异(p > 0.05)。与静止时相比,主动收缩时脊柱旁肌肉的 SWE 模量相对增加的中值(四分位数间距)从 68.11 (86.29) 到 101.69 (54.33)%,与腿筋肌肉的相应增加值[从 225.94 (114.72) 到 463.16 (185.16)%]呈中度到高度相关(r > 0.672)。主动状态下的均方根信号大于被动状态下的均方根信号,90° 时的均方根信号低于 45°(SM/ST)和 0°(所有肌肉)时的均方根信号。脊柱旁肌和腘绳肌被动僵硬度之间的联系表明,腰椎和下肢之间的肌筋膜连接可能传递力量。在实验室环境中,腘绳肌锻炼会影响脊柱旁肌肉的僵硬度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信