Ocular Surface Disease with BAK preserved Travoprost and Polyquaternium 1(Polyquad) preserved Travoprost.

Romanian journal of ophthalmology Pub Date : 2019-07-01
Suresh Kumar, Tanu Singh, Parul Ichhpujani, Sanchi Vohra
{"title":"Ocular Surface Disease with BAK preserved Travoprost and Polyquaternium 1(Polyquad) preserved Travoprost.","authors":"Suresh Kumar, Tanu Singh, Parul Ichhpujani, Sanchi Vohra","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> The topical medications containing benzalkonium chloride (BAK) as preservative is known to induce corneal toxicity and ocular surface disease (OSD) in glaucoma patients. Newer preservatives like SofZia or polyquaternium-1 (Polyquad) have been developed to replace BAK in many medications. The present study aimed at comparing the OSD in glaucoma patients receiving BAK preserved travoprost versus travoprost with polyquad as preservative and controls not receiving any medications. <b>Methods.</b> This prospective, controlled, observational study was conducted on patients of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) on medications for more than 6 months. The first group comprised of 40 patients receiving BAK preserved travoprost, the second group included 40 patients receiving polyquad preserved travoprost and 30 of control group not receiving any medical treatment. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores using Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Questionnaire were assessed and compared in all subjects. <b>Results.</b> The mean OSDI score was 29.09 ± 13.45 in BAK group, 12.4 ± 5.085 in polyquad group and 10.93 ± 7.36 in controls. The mean difference in OSDI scores between BAK and polyquad group 16.63 (p < 0.05) and between the BAK and control group was 18.96 (p < 0.05). The mean difference in OSDI scores between the polyquad and control group was 1.53 (p > 0.05). The mean IOP in the BAK group was 19.2 ± 3.5 and in polyquad group was 20.1 ± 4.2. The IOP measured at 12 months of treatment was 13.2 ± 2.1 in BAK group and 12.8 ± 3.3 in polyquad group. The IOP measured at baseline and 12 months showed statistically significant difference in both the groups (p <o.oo1, p=o.ooo, respectively). <b>Conclusions.</b> OSDI scores revealed significantly lesser symptoms in polyquad preserved travoprost when compared to BAK preserved travoprost. The OSDI scores in polyquad group were also comparable to the control group. Hence, for long term glaucoma management polyquad containing travoprost should be preferred over the BAK preserved travoprost.</p>","PeriodicalId":94355,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","volume":"63 3","pages":"249-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The topical medications containing benzalkonium chloride (BAK) as preservative is known to induce corneal toxicity and ocular surface disease (OSD) in glaucoma patients. Newer preservatives like SofZia or polyquaternium-1 (Polyquad) have been developed to replace BAK in many medications. The present study aimed at comparing the OSD in glaucoma patients receiving BAK preserved travoprost versus travoprost with polyquad as preservative and controls not receiving any medications. Methods. This prospective, controlled, observational study was conducted on patients of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) on medications for more than 6 months. The first group comprised of 40 patients receiving BAK preserved travoprost, the second group included 40 patients receiving polyquad preserved travoprost and 30 of control group not receiving any medical treatment. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores using Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Questionnaire were assessed and compared in all subjects. Results. The mean OSDI score was 29.09 ± 13.45 in BAK group, 12.4 ± 5.085 in polyquad group and 10.93 ± 7.36 in controls. The mean difference in OSDI scores between BAK and polyquad group 16.63 (p < 0.05) and between the BAK and control group was 18.96 (p < 0.05). The mean difference in OSDI scores between the polyquad and control group was 1.53 (p > 0.05). The mean IOP in the BAK group was 19.2 ± 3.5 and in polyquad group was 20.1 ± 4.2. The IOP measured at 12 months of treatment was 13.2 ± 2.1 in BAK group and 12.8 ± 3.3 in polyquad group. The IOP measured at baseline and 12 months showed statistically significant difference in both the groups (p Conclusions. OSDI scores revealed significantly lesser symptoms in polyquad preserved travoprost when compared to BAK preserved travoprost. The OSDI scores in polyquad group were also comparable to the control group. Hence, for long term glaucoma management polyquad containing travoprost should be preferred over the BAK preserved travoprost.

使用 BAK 防腐剂曲伏前列素和聚季铵盐 1(Polyquad) 防腐剂曲伏前列素治疗眼表疾病。
导言。众所周知,含有苯扎氯铵(BAK)防腐剂的外用药物会诱发青光眼患者的角膜毒性和眼表疾病(OSD)。目前已开发出新的防腐剂,如 SofZia 或聚季铵盐-1(Polyquad),以取代许多药物中的苯扎氯铵。本研究旨在比较接受 BAK 防腐剂的曲伏前列素与使用聚季铵盐作为防腐剂的曲伏前列素的青光眼患者以及未接受任何药物治疗的对照组的 OSD。方法。这项前瞻性对照观察研究针对服药 6 个月以上的原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者。第一组包括 40 名接受 BAK 防腐剂曲伏前列素治疗的患者,第二组包括 40 名接受多聚酶防腐剂曲伏前列素治疗的患者和 30 名未接受任何药物治疗的对照组患者。使用眼表疾病指数(OSDI)问卷对所有受试者的眼表疾病指数(OSDI)评分进行评估和比较。结果BAK组的平均OSDI评分为(29.09 ± 13.45)分,Polyquad组为(12.4 ± 5.085)分,对照组为(10.93 ± 7.36)分。BAK 组和多象限组之间的 OSDI 评分平均差异为 16.63(P < 0.05),BAK 组和对照组之间的 OSDI 评分平均差异为 18.96(P < 0.05)。多边形组和对照组的 OSDI 评分平均值相差 1.53(P > 0.05)。BAK 组的平均眼压为(19.2 ± 3.5),多导组的平均眼压为(20.1 ± 4.2)。治疗 12 个月时,BAK 组的平均眼压为(13.2 ± 2.1),Polyquad 组为(12.8 ± 3.3)。两组患者在基线和 12 个月时的眼压测量结果均有显著的统计学差异(P 结论:BAK 组和多组患者在基线和 12 个月时的眼压测量结果均有显著的统计学差异。与 BAK 保留曲伏前列素相比,OSDI 评分显示多曲保留曲伏前列素的症状明显较轻。多吉美组的 OSDI 评分也与对照组相当。因此,在青光眼的长期治疗中,应首选含聚前列素的曲伏前列素,而不是含 BAK 的曲伏前列素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信