Interprofessional contact with conventional healthcare providers in oncology: a survey among complementary medicine practitioners.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Marit Mentink, Julia Jansen, Janneke Noordman, Liesbeth van Vliet, Martine Busch, Sandra van Dulmen
{"title":"Interprofessional contact with conventional healthcare providers in oncology: a survey among complementary medicine practitioners.","authors":"Marit Mentink, Julia Jansen, Janneke Noordman, Liesbeth van Vliet, Martine Busch, Sandra van Dulmen","doi":"10.1186/s12906-024-04563-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Half of all patients with cancer use complementary medicine. Given the benefits and risks associated with complementary medicine use, contact between complementary medicine practitioners and conventional healthcare providers (oncologists, nurses) is important for monitoring the health and well-being of mutual patients with cancer. Research on occurrence of such interprofessional contact is scarce. This study aims to describe complementary medicine practitioners' experiences with contact with conventional healthcare providers about mutual patients with cancer and the importance they attach to patient disclosure of complementary medicine use to their conventional healthcare provider. Predictors for interprofessional contact are explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was administered among complementary medicine practitioners who treat patients with cancer or cancer survivors and who are member of a professional association in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was completed by 1481 complementary medicine practitioners. 40% of the participants reported to have contact with conventional healthcare providers of patients with cancer. Only 13% of the complementary medicine practitioners experienced conventional healthcare providers as open to communication with them. An explorative logistic regression showed that openness of conventional healthcare providers as experienced by complementary medicine practitioners was the most important predictor for the occurrence of interprofessional contact (OR = 8.12, 95% CI 5.12-12.86, p < .001). Most complementary medicine practitioners (82%) considered it important that patients disclose complementary medicine use to their conventional healthcare provider and 49% of the participants always motivates their patients to do so.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interprofessional contact with conventional healthcare providers in oncology occurs but is not routine for most complementary medicine practitioners. More than one-third of the surveyed complementary medicine practitioners experienced conventional healthcare providers as not open to communication with them. The openness of conventional healthcare providers as experienced by complementary practitioners is an important predictor for interprofessional contact to take place. Most complementary practitioners acknowledge the importance of patient disclosure of complementary medicine use to their conventional healthcare provider. Open communication about the topic of complementary medicine use between complementary practitioners, conventional healthcare providers and patients prevents overlooking relevant medical information and facilitates optimal monitoring of health and safety of patients with cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9128,"journal":{"name":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11282773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-024-04563-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Half of all patients with cancer use complementary medicine. Given the benefits and risks associated with complementary medicine use, contact between complementary medicine practitioners and conventional healthcare providers (oncologists, nurses) is important for monitoring the health and well-being of mutual patients with cancer. Research on occurrence of such interprofessional contact is scarce. This study aims to describe complementary medicine practitioners' experiences with contact with conventional healthcare providers about mutual patients with cancer and the importance they attach to patient disclosure of complementary medicine use to their conventional healthcare provider. Predictors for interprofessional contact are explored.

Methods: An online survey was administered among complementary medicine practitioners who treat patients with cancer or cancer survivors and who are member of a professional association in the Netherlands.

Results: The survey was completed by 1481 complementary medicine practitioners. 40% of the participants reported to have contact with conventional healthcare providers of patients with cancer. Only 13% of the complementary medicine practitioners experienced conventional healthcare providers as open to communication with them. An explorative logistic regression showed that openness of conventional healthcare providers as experienced by complementary medicine practitioners was the most important predictor for the occurrence of interprofessional contact (OR = 8.12, 95% CI 5.12-12.86, p < .001). Most complementary medicine practitioners (82%) considered it important that patients disclose complementary medicine use to their conventional healthcare provider and 49% of the participants always motivates their patients to do so.

Conclusions: Interprofessional contact with conventional healthcare providers in oncology occurs but is not routine for most complementary medicine practitioners. More than one-third of the surveyed complementary medicine practitioners experienced conventional healthcare providers as not open to communication with them. The openness of conventional healthcare providers as experienced by complementary practitioners is an important predictor for interprofessional contact to take place. Most complementary practitioners acknowledge the importance of patient disclosure of complementary medicine use to their conventional healthcare provider. Open communication about the topic of complementary medicine use between complementary practitioners, conventional healthcare providers and patients prevents overlooking relevant medical information and facilitates optimal monitoring of health and safety of patients with cancer.

在肿瘤学领域与传统医疗服务提供者的跨专业接触:对辅助医学从业者的调查。
背景:半数癌症患者使用辅助药物。鉴于使用辅助药物的益处和风险,辅助药物从业者与传统医疗服务提供者(肿瘤学家、护士)之间的接触对于监测癌症患者的健康和福祉非常重要。有关此类跨专业接触的研究很少。本研究旨在描述辅助医疗从业者与传统医疗服务提供者就共同癌症患者进行接触的经验,以及他们对患者向传统医疗服务提供者披露辅助医疗使用情况的重视程度。研究还探讨了专业间接触的预测因素:方法:对治疗癌症患者或癌症幸存者的辅助医疗从业者进行在线调查,这些从业者都是荷兰一个专业协会的成员:共有 1481 名辅助医学从业人员完成了调查。40%的参与者表示与癌症患者的传统医疗服务提供者有过接触。只有 13% 的辅助医疗从业者认为传统医疗服务提供者愿意与他们沟通。探索性逻辑回归结果显示,辅助医疗从业者认为常规医疗服务提供者的开放程度是预测发生跨专业接触的最重要因素(OR = 8.12,95% CI 5.12-12.86,p 结论:辅助医疗从业者认为常规医疗服务提供者的开放程度是预测发生跨专业接触的最重要因素(OR = 8.12,95% CI 5.12-12.86,p):在肿瘤学领域,与传统医疗服务提供者的跨专业接触时有发生,但对大多数辅助医学从业者来说并非家常便饭。在接受调查的辅助医疗从业者中,超过三分之一的人认为常规医疗服务提供者不愿意与他们交流。辅助医疗从业者认为传统医疗服务提供者的开放程度是进行跨专业接触的一个重要预测因素。大多数辅助医疗从业者都承认,患者向传统医疗服务提供者披露辅助医疗使用情况非常重要。辅助医疗从业者、传统医疗服务提供者和患者之间就辅助医疗的使用问题进行坦诚交流,可以避免忽略相关的医疗信息,有利于对癌症患者的健康和安全进行最佳监控。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
300
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信