Donor selection in allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Current Opinion in Hematology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1097/MOH.0000000000000831
Francisco Barriga, Alberto Cardoso Martins Lima
{"title":"Donor selection in allogeneic stem cell transplantation.","authors":"Francisco Barriga, Alberto Cardoso Martins Lima","doi":"10.1097/MOH.0000000000000831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Recent progress in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) characterization, increased accrual of unrelated donors and cord blood units, and a new platform for haploidentical transplantation have resulted in the widespread availability of donors for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Advances in HLA typing have identified an increasing number of loci and alleles that are crucial for successful transplantation. Newer HLA A, B, C, DRB1, and DQB1 alleles, DPB1 mismatches, and HLA B leader sequence matching are incorporated into donor selection algorithms. Donor selection is highly relevant because of recently published conflicting studies using different donor types. These studies are largely retrospective and compare patients with different diseases and stages, conditioning regimens, graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and time periods. A broad consensus indicates that the best donor is an available matched sibling, followed by a matched unrelated donor, and then alternative donors such as haploidentical, mismatched unrelated, and cord blood units. This consensus is being challenged by other factors, such as donor age, patient condition, urgency of transplantation, and costs involved.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In this review, we will analyze the unique characteristics of each donor type, the HLA and non HLA factors that affect donor choices, and the outstanding comparative outcome studies of different donor usage in hematologic malignancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55196,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOH.0000000000000831","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Recent progress in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) characterization, increased accrual of unrelated donors and cord blood units, and a new platform for haploidentical transplantation have resulted in the widespread availability of donors for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Recent findings: Advances in HLA typing have identified an increasing number of loci and alleles that are crucial for successful transplantation. Newer HLA A, B, C, DRB1, and DQB1 alleles, DPB1 mismatches, and HLA B leader sequence matching are incorporated into donor selection algorithms. Donor selection is highly relevant because of recently published conflicting studies using different donor types. These studies are largely retrospective and compare patients with different diseases and stages, conditioning regimens, graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and time periods. A broad consensus indicates that the best donor is an available matched sibling, followed by a matched unrelated donor, and then alternative donors such as haploidentical, mismatched unrelated, and cord blood units. This consensus is being challenged by other factors, such as donor age, patient condition, urgency of transplantation, and costs involved.

Summary: In this review, we will analyze the unique characteristics of each donor type, the HLA and non HLA factors that affect donor choices, and the outstanding comparative outcome studies of different donor usage in hematologic malignancies.

异体干细胞移植中的供体选择。
综述的目的:人类白细胞抗原(HLA)特征描述的最新进展、非亲属捐献者和脐带血单位数量的增加以及单倍体移植的新平台,使得异基因造血干细胞移植捐献者的可用性得到了普及:最近的发现:HLA 分型技术的进步确定了越来越多对成功移植至关重要的位点和等位基因。最新的 HLA A、B、C、DRB1 和 DQB1 等位基因、DPB1 错配和 HLA B 头序列匹配已被纳入供体选择算法。由于最近发表的使用不同供体类型的研究相互矛盾,因此供体选择非常重要。这些研究大多是回顾性的,并对不同疾病、不同阶段、不同调理方案、不同移植物抗宿主疾病(GVHD)预防措施和不同时间段的患者进行了比较。一个广泛的共识是,最佳供体是现有的配型相合的兄弟姐妹,其次是配型相合的非亲属供体,然后是其他供体,如单倍体、不匹配的非亲属供体和脐带血单位。小结:在这篇综述中,我们将分析每种供体类型的独特特征、影响供体选择的 HLA 和非 HLA 因素,以及血液系统恶性肿瘤中不同供体用法的杰出比较结果研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Hematology is an easy-to-digest bimonthly journal covering the most interesting and important advances in the field of hematology. Its hand-picked selection of editors ensure the highest quality selection of unbiased review articles on themes from nine key subject areas, including myeloid biology, Vascular biology, hematopoiesis and erythroid system and its diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信