Comparative Analysis of Legislation on Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy: Italy's position relate to international panorama.

Q2 Medicine
L Pellegrini, L Sorace, V Tortorella, U Baggio, L De Paola, G D'Antonio, R La Russa, P Frati
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Legislation on Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy: Italy's position relate to international panorama.","authors":"L Pellegrini, L Sorace, V Tortorella, U Baggio, L De Paola, G D'Antonio, R La Russa, P Frati","doi":"10.7417/CT.2024.5097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The voluntary interruption of pregnancy (VIP) remains one of the most contentious issues worldwide, subject to different legal frameworks and cultural interpretations. Access to VIP is considered a fundamental right for women, recognized by international organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and supported by the United Nations. It is estimated that 40-50 million abortions are performed each year, of which about 75% are in developing countries. IVG is legal in only 25 countries, while in the others, it is severely restricted or illegal, leading to an increase in risky and illegal practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We consulted government and ministerial websites in European countries to gather data on current abortion laws. In addition, scientific articles and legislative documents compare regulations across some countries, especially from 2020 to today, analyzing differences, similarities and implications. Percentage data on the number of abortions in several European countries, including Italy, were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis revealed significant differences in abortion laws between European countries. In many countries, abortion is allowed at the request of the woman within a certain gestational age limit, which typically ranges between 10 and 24 weeks. However, in some countries, the restrictions are much stricter, with limitations making access to legal abortion very difficult or impossible. In conclu-sion, the Italian experience highlights the importance of considering local sociocultural dynamics in shaping IVG policies and highlights the need for an evidence-based approach to guarantee women right to reproductive health internationally, surrounding reproductive rights, gender equality, and public health policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50686,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Terapeutica","volume":"175 Suppl 1(4)","pages":"117-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Terapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7417/CT.2024.5097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The voluntary interruption of pregnancy (VIP) remains one of the most contentious issues worldwide, subject to different legal frameworks and cultural interpretations. Access to VIP is considered a fundamental right for women, recognized by international organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and supported by the United Nations. It is estimated that 40-50 million abortions are performed each year, of which about 75% are in developing countries. IVG is legal in only 25 countries, while in the others, it is severely restricted or illegal, leading to an increase in risky and illegal practices.

Methods: We consulted government and ministerial websites in European countries to gather data on current abortion laws. In addition, scientific articles and legislative documents compare regulations across some countries, especially from 2020 to today, analyzing differences, similarities and implications. Percentage data on the number of abortions in several European countries, including Italy, were analyzed.

Conclusion: Our analysis revealed significant differences in abortion laws between European countries. In many countries, abortion is allowed at the request of the woman within a certain gestational age limit, which typically ranges between 10 and 24 weeks. However, in some countries, the restrictions are much stricter, with limitations making access to legal abortion very difficult or impossible. In conclu-sion, the Italian experience highlights the importance of considering local sociocultural dynamics in shaping IVG policies and highlights the need for an evidence-based approach to guarantee women right to reproductive health internationally, surrounding reproductive rights, gender equality, and public health policy.

自愿中止妊娠立法的比较分析:意大利的立场与国际全景的关系。
背景:自愿中止妊娠(VIP)仍是全球最具争议的问题之一,受制于不同的法律框架和文化解释。自愿中止妊娠被认为是妇女的一项基本权利,得到了世界卫生组织(WHO)等国际组织的承认和联合国的支持。据估计,每年有 4 000 万至 5 000 万例人工流产,其中约 75% 发生在发展中国家。只有 25 个国家的 IVG 是合法的,而在其他国家,IVG 受到严格限制或属于非法行为,导致高风险和非法行为的增加:我们查阅了欧洲国家的政府和部委网站,以收集有关现行堕胎法律的数据。此外,科学文章和立法文件对一些国家的法规进行了比较,尤其是 2020 年至今的法规,分析其异同和影响。我们还分析了包括意大利在内的多个欧洲国家堕胎数量的百分比数据:我们的分析揭示了欧洲各国在堕胎法方面的显著差异。在许多国家,根据妇女的要求,允许在一定的妊娠年龄限制(通常在 10 到 24 周之间)内进行堕胎。然而,在一些国家,限制要严格得多,这些限制使得合法堕胎变得非常困难或不可能。总之,意大利的经验凸显了在制定 IVG 政策时考虑当地社会文化动态的重要性,并强 调了在国际范围内,围绕生殖权利、性别平等和公共卫生政策,采取循证方法保障妇女生 殖健康权利的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinica Terapeutica
Clinica Terapeutica PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Clinica Terapeutica è una rivista di Clinica e Terapia in Medicina e Chirurgia, fondata nel 1951 dal Prof. Mariano Messini (1901-1980), Direttore dell''Istituto di Idrologia Medica dell''Università di Roma “La Sapienza”. La rivista è pubblicata come “periodico bimestrale” dalla Società Editrice Universo, casa editrice fondata nel 1945 dal Comm. Luigi Pellino. La Clinica Terapeutica è indicizzata su MEDLINE, INDEX MEDICUS, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信