Substitution of Methods in Suicide Deaths - Firearm Injury and Hanging.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Alexander Lundberg, Maryann Mason, Lori Ann Post
{"title":"Substitution of Methods in Suicide Deaths - Firearm Injury and Hanging.","authors":"Alexander Lundberg, Maryann Mason, Lori Ann Post","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Prevention strategies for suicide emphasize restrictions on firearm access. These restrictions may lose efficacy if individuals substitute other lethal suicide methods. <i>Aims:</i> The objective of this study is to determine the extent to which individuals who die by suicide in the United States substitute hanging for firearm injury. <i>Methods:</i> This study is a repeated cross-sectional analysis of suicide deaths in the United States from 2003 to 2021. Multiple regression was used to estimate the effect of firearm access proxies on individual suicide methods (hanging vs. firearm injury). <i>Results:</i> The probability of death by hanging was significantly and negatively associated with proxies of firearm access. <i>Limitations:</i> This study does not compare crude rates of suicide by state, which rise on average with rates of firearm ownership. The National Violent Death Reporting System expanded over the sample period, so early years have incomplete ascertainment. Rates of gun ownership and gun safety law scales are measured as proxies. <i>Conclusions:</i> Although means restriction around firearm access is a critical tool for suicide prevention, complementary strategies for prevention around hanging merit further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"389-394"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000964","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prevention strategies for suicide emphasize restrictions on firearm access. These restrictions may lose efficacy if individuals substitute other lethal suicide methods. Aims: The objective of this study is to determine the extent to which individuals who die by suicide in the United States substitute hanging for firearm injury. Methods: This study is a repeated cross-sectional analysis of suicide deaths in the United States from 2003 to 2021. Multiple regression was used to estimate the effect of firearm access proxies on individual suicide methods (hanging vs. firearm injury). Results: The probability of death by hanging was significantly and negatively associated with proxies of firearm access. Limitations: This study does not compare crude rates of suicide by state, which rise on average with rates of firearm ownership. The National Violent Death Reporting System expanded over the sample period, so early years have incomplete ascertainment. Rates of gun ownership and gun safety law scales are measured as proxies. Conclusions: Although means restriction around firearm access is a critical tool for suicide prevention, complementary strategies for prevention around hanging merit further study.

自杀死亡的替代方法--枪伤和上吊。
背景:自杀预防策略强调限制使用枪支。如果有人用其他致命的自杀方式替代,这些限制措施就可能失去效力。目的:本研究旨在确定美国自杀死亡者用上吊代替枪支伤害的程度。研究方法:本研究对美国 2003 年至 2021 年期间的自杀死亡案例进行了重复横截面分析。采用多元回归法估算了枪支使用替代物对个人自杀方式(上吊与枪支伤害)的影响。结果显示上吊死亡的概率与使用枪支的可能性呈显著负相关。局限性:这项研究没有比较各州的粗略自杀率,而各州的粗略自杀率会随着枪支拥有率的上升而平均上升。国家暴力死亡报告系统(National Violent Death Reporting System)在样本期内不断扩大,因此早年的调查数据并不完整。枪支拥有率和枪支安全法尺度是作为代用指标来衡量的。结论:虽然对枪支使用的手段限制是预防自杀的重要工具,但围绕绞刑的补充性预防策略也值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信