The affinity-efficacy problem: an essential part of pharmacology education.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Royal Society Open Science Pub Date : 2024-07-24 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1098/rsos.240487
James P Higham, David Colquhoun
{"title":"The affinity-efficacy problem: an essential part of pharmacology education.","authors":"James P Higham, David Colquhoun","doi":"10.1098/rsos.240487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A fundamental mistake in receptor theory has led to an enduring misunderstanding of how to estimate the affinity and efficacy of an agonist. These properties are inextricably linked and cannot be easily separated in any case where the binding of a ligand induces a conformation change in its receptor. Consequently, binding curves and concentration-response relationships for receptor agonists have no straightforward interpretation. This problem-the affinity-efficacy problem-remains overlooked and misunderstood despite it being recognized in 1987. To avoid the further propagation of this misunderstanding, we propose in this review that the affinity-efficacy problem should be included in the core curricula for pharmacology undergraduates proposed by the British Pharmacological Society and the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (IUPHAR).</p>","PeriodicalId":21525,"journal":{"name":"Royal Society Open Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11267233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Society Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240487","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A fundamental mistake in receptor theory has led to an enduring misunderstanding of how to estimate the affinity and efficacy of an agonist. These properties are inextricably linked and cannot be easily separated in any case where the binding of a ligand induces a conformation change in its receptor. Consequently, binding curves and concentration-response relationships for receptor agonists have no straightforward interpretation. This problem-the affinity-efficacy problem-remains overlooked and misunderstood despite it being recognized in 1987. To avoid the further propagation of this misunderstanding, we propose in this review that the affinity-efficacy problem should be included in the core curricula for pharmacology undergraduates proposed by the British Pharmacological Society and the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (IUPHAR).

亲和力-效能问题:药理学教育的重要组成部分。
受体理论中的一个基本错误导致了人们对如何估算激动剂的亲和力和功效的长期误解。这些特性密不可分,在配体结合引起受体构象变化的任何情况下,都不能轻易分开。因此,受体激动剂的结合曲线和浓度-反应关系无法直接解释。这个问题--亲和力--效力问题--尽管在 1987 年就已被认识到,但仍然被忽视和误解。为了避免这一误解的进一步传播,我们在本综述中建议将亲和力-效价问题纳入英国药理学会和国际基础与临床药理学联合会(IUPHAR)提议的药理学本科生核心课程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Royal Society Open Science
Royal Society Open Science Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Royal Society Open Science is a new open journal publishing high-quality original research across the entire range of science on the basis of objective peer-review. The journal covers the entire range of science and mathematics and will allow the Society to publish all the high-quality work it receives without the usual restrictions on scope, length or impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信