Video Versus Nonvideo in a Rabbit Training Model for Establishing an Emergency Front of Neck Airway in Children: A Prospective Trial.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Francesca Amato, Christian P Both, Elena Alonso, Pedro D Wendel-Garcia, Birgit Diem, Celine Schneider, Anna Schmidt, Michael Kemper, Achim Schmitz, Jörg Thomas
{"title":"Video Versus Nonvideo in a Rabbit Training Model for Establishing an Emergency Front of Neck Airway in Children: A Prospective Trial.","authors":"Francesca Amato, Christian P Both, Elena Alonso, Pedro D Wendel-Garcia, Birgit Diem, Celine Schneider, Anna Schmidt, Michael Kemper, Achim Schmitz, Jörg Thomas","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Simulating a realistic \"cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate\" (CICO) situation to train an \"emergency front of neck airway\" is difficult. It further remains unclear if provision of regular technical refreshers improves performance in the setting of a real CICO situation. The purpose of this prospective study on an established surgical rabbit cadaver tracheostomy model was to evaluate the benefit of viewing training material shortly before performing \"emergency front of neck airway.\"</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Previously trained participants were randomized into 2 groups. The control group (video) was allowed to watch an instructional video before performing a tracheotomy on the training model, while the study group (nonvideo) was not. Queried outcomes included success rate, performance time, and severe secondary airway injuries between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 29 tracheotomies performed by 29 participants, the overall success rate was 86% (92% video; 81% nonvideo, P = 0.4). Performance time was not different between the 2 groups (video: 80 s [IQR25-75: 53-86], nonvideo 64 s [IQR25-75: 47-102]; P = 0.93). Only in the nonvideo group, the performance time and the time between the workshops correlated positively (P = 0.048). Severe secondary injuries were noted in 4 of 29 rabbit cadavers, 2 in each group. Watching a refresher video before performing an emergency surgical tracheostomy in an infant training model did not influence the success rate and the performance time in previously trained anesthetists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results highlight the ease of learning, memorization, and recall of this emergency surgical tracheostomy technique and may demonstrate its applicability in a real infant CICO situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003248","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Simulating a realistic "cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate" (CICO) situation to train an "emergency front of neck airway" is difficult. It further remains unclear if provision of regular technical refreshers improves performance in the setting of a real CICO situation. The purpose of this prospective study on an established surgical rabbit cadaver tracheostomy model was to evaluate the benefit of viewing training material shortly before performing "emergency front of neck airway."

Methods: Previously trained participants were randomized into 2 groups. The control group (video) was allowed to watch an instructional video before performing a tracheotomy on the training model, while the study group (nonvideo) was not. Queried outcomes included success rate, performance time, and severe secondary airway injuries between the 2 groups.

Results: In 29 tracheotomies performed by 29 participants, the overall success rate was 86% (92% video; 81% nonvideo, P = 0.4). Performance time was not different between the 2 groups (video: 80 s [IQR25-75: 53-86], nonvideo 64 s [IQR25-75: 47-102]; P = 0.93). Only in the nonvideo group, the performance time and the time between the workshops correlated positively (P = 0.048). Severe secondary injuries were noted in 4 of 29 rabbit cadavers, 2 in each group. Watching a refresher video before performing an emergency surgical tracheostomy in an infant training model did not influence the success rate and the performance time in previously trained anesthetists.

Conclusions: These results highlight the ease of learning, memorization, and recall of this emergency surgical tracheostomy technique and may demonstrate its applicability in a real infant CICO situation.

在兔子训练模型中使用视频与非视频为儿童建立颈前紧急气道:前瞻性试验
目标:模拟真实的 "无法插管、无法吸氧"(CICO)情况来训练 "颈前气道急救 "非常困难。此外,在真实的 CICO 情况下,定期进行技术复习是否能提高训练效果仍不清楚。本前瞻性研究在已建立的外科兔尸体气管切开术模型上进行,目的是评估在实施 "紧急颈前气道 "前不久观看培训材料的益处:将之前接受过培训的参与者随机分为两组。对照组(视频组)允许在对训练模型进行气管切开术前观看教学视频,而研究组(非视频组)则不允许。询问的结果包括两组的成功率、操作时间和严重继发性气道损伤:结果:在 29 名参与者进行的 29 例气管切开术中,总体成功率为 86%(视频组为 92%;非视频组为 81%,P = 0.4)。两组的操作时间没有差异(视频组:80 秒 [IQR25-75: 53-86],非视频组:64 秒 [IQR25-75: 47-102];P = 0.93)。只有在非视频组中,表演时间和工作坊之间的时间呈正相关(P = 0.048)。29 只兔子尸体中有 4 只受到严重的二次伤害,每组 2 只。在婴儿训练模型中进行紧急手术气管切开术前观看复习视频不会影响先前接受过培训的麻醉师的成功率和手术时间:这些结果凸显了这种紧急外科气管切开术的易学、易记和易回忆性,并可证明其适用于真实的婴儿 CICO 情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信