Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery in African Women: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Abdulhafiz Oladapo Adesunkanmi, Funmilola Olanike Wuraola, Oluwatobiloba Michael Fagbayimu, Murtuza Aliasger Calcuttawala, Tajudeen Wahab, Adewale Oluseye Adisa
{"title":"Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery in African Women: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Abdulhafiz Oladapo Adesunkanmi, Funmilola Olanike Wuraola, Oluwatobiloba Michael Fagbayimu, Murtuza Aliasger Calcuttawala, Tajudeen Wahab, Adewale Oluseye Adisa","doi":"10.1200/GO.23.00460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women worldwide. Surgery is a major treatment modality for breast cancer, and over the years, breast-conserving surgeries with breast radiation have shown similar outcomes with mastectomy. Not much is known about the frequency and outcome of breast-conserving surgery in Africa. This systematic review provides a comprehensive summary of the evidence evaluating cosmetic and oncologic outcomes after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) for breast cancer in African women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Databases were systematically searched for studies on African women undergoing OBCS. The oncologic and cosmetic outcomes, as well as the localization and reconstruction techniques, were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the frequency and proportions of the extracted variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search yielded 266 articles but only 26 of these were included in the review. Majority of the studies were from Egypt and South Africa. These studies collectively evaluated 1,896 patients with a mean age of 48.2 years and a mean follow-up period of 36.9 months. The most common histopathology was T2 (71.4%) invasive ductal carcinoma. Hook wire localization was the most common technique used for nonpalpable lesions in 85.3% of patients. Of the studies reporting oncoplastic technique, the latissimus dorsi volume replacement technique was the most reported (15%). Most patients were satisfied with their cosmetic outcome. Seroma was the most common postoperative complication (44.6%). Among studies that reported oncologic outcome data, the crude overall survival and disease-free survival were 93.1% and 89.4%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review revealed that the outcome of OBCS in African women compares with that in developed countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.23.00460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women worldwide. Surgery is a major treatment modality for breast cancer, and over the years, breast-conserving surgeries with breast radiation have shown similar outcomes with mastectomy. Not much is known about the frequency and outcome of breast-conserving surgery in Africa. This systematic review provides a comprehensive summary of the evidence evaluating cosmetic and oncologic outcomes after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) for breast cancer in African women.

Methods: This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Databases were systematically searched for studies on African women undergoing OBCS. The oncologic and cosmetic outcomes, as well as the localization and reconstruction techniques, were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the frequency and proportions of the extracted variables.

Results: The literature search yielded 266 articles but only 26 of these were included in the review. Majority of the studies were from Egypt and South Africa. These studies collectively evaluated 1,896 patients with a mean age of 48.2 years and a mean follow-up period of 36.9 months. The most common histopathology was T2 (71.4%) invasive ductal carcinoma. Hook wire localization was the most common technique used for nonpalpable lesions in 85.3% of patients. Of the studies reporting oncoplastic technique, the latissimus dorsi volume replacement technique was the most reported (15%). Most patients were satisfied with their cosmetic outcome. Seroma was the most common postoperative complication (44.6%). Among studies that reported oncologic outcome data, the crude overall survival and disease-free survival were 93.1% and 89.4%, respectively.

Conclusion: This systematic review revealed that the outcome of OBCS in African women compares with that in developed countries.

非洲妇女的肿瘤整形保乳手术:系统回顾
目的:乳腺癌是全球妇女最常确诊的癌症。手术是治疗乳腺癌的主要方法,多年来,保乳手术和乳房放射治疗的效果与乳房切除术相似。但人们对非洲保乳手术的频率和效果知之甚少。本系统性综述全面总结了非洲女性接受肿瘤整形保乳手术(OBCS)后的美容和肿瘤治疗效果的评估证据:本综述根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》声明进行。我们在数据库中系统地搜索了有关非洲女性接受 OBCS 的研究。对肿瘤和美容效果以及定位和重建技术进行了评估。结果:文献检索共获得 266 篇文章,但其中只有 26 篇被纳入综述。大部分研究来自埃及和南非。这些研究共评估了 1,896 名患者,平均年龄为 48.2 岁,平均随访时间为 36.9 个月。最常见的组织病理学是 T2(71.4%)浸润性导管癌。钩丝定位是用于非肉眼可见病变的最常用技术,占 85.3%。在报道肿瘤整形技术的研究中,背阔肌体积置换技术的报道最多(15%)。大多数患者对美容效果感到满意。血清肿是最常见的术后并发症(44.6%)。在报告了肿瘤结果数据的研究中,粗略的总生存率和无病生存率分别为93.1%和89.4%:这项系统性综述显示,非洲妇女的 OBCS 结果与发达国家的结果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信