Comparing Functional Frailty and Radiographic Sarcopenia as Predictors of Outcomes After Liver Transplant

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Sydney L. Olson, Praneet Polineni, William Alexander Henry Schwartz, Avesh J. Thuluvath, Andres Duarte-Rojo, Daniela P. Ladner
{"title":"Comparing Functional Frailty and Radiographic Sarcopenia as Predictors of Outcomes After Liver Transplant","authors":"Sydney L. Olson,&nbsp;Praneet Polineni,&nbsp;William Alexander Henry Schwartz,&nbsp;Avesh J. Thuluvath,&nbsp;Andres Duarte-Rojo,&nbsp;Daniela P. Ladner","doi":"10.1111/ctr.15412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Frailty and sarcopenia are associated with an increased risk of hospitalization and mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease. The ability to identify frail patients at risk of adverse outcomes could help optimize liver transplant (LT) evaluations and pre-transplant care. This study compared sarcopenia, via L3-psoas muscle index (L3-PMI), to frailty, via liver frailty index (LFI) and analyzed associated outcomes after liver transplantation (LT).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective review of consecutive LT-recipients with cross-sectional abdominal/pelvic imaging were reviewed over 5 years at a single transplant center.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four hundred and twenty-six patients underwent transplant during this study interval; 31% of patients were sarcopenic. Two hundred eight patients underwent LFI evaluation: 25% were frail, 59% were prefrail, and 16% were robust. Sarcopenic patients had higher LFI scores indicating greater frailty (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Both sarcopenia and LFI-frailty were associated with significantly higher MELD-Na scores. Length of post-LT hospital stay was increased in sarcopenic (mean 14 vs. nonsarcopenic 11 days, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and LFI-frail patients (mean 13 vs. 10 prefrail, 8 robust, <i>p</i> = 0.04). As a categorical variable, neither LFI-frailty nor sarcopenia were significantly associated with reduced survival at 1-year (robust 100%, prefrail 93.5%, frail 91.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.31) (nonsarcopenic 94.4%, sarcopenic 91.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.30). However, LFI score was significantly associated with mortality at 1-year (OR 2.133, <i>p</i> = 0.047).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Radiographic sarcopenia is a suitable proxy for in-person frailty assessment as both L3-PMI and LFI capture frail patients’ pre-LT. However, physical assessment with frailty better predicts 1-year mortality post-LT than the measurement of muscle mass.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.15412","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.15412","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Frailty and sarcopenia are associated with an increased risk of hospitalization and mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease. The ability to identify frail patients at risk of adverse outcomes could help optimize liver transplant (LT) evaluations and pre-transplant care. This study compared sarcopenia, via L3-psoas muscle index (L3-PMI), to frailty, via liver frailty index (LFI) and analyzed associated outcomes after liver transplantation (LT).

Methods

A retrospective review of consecutive LT-recipients with cross-sectional abdominal/pelvic imaging were reviewed over 5 years at a single transplant center.

Results

Four hundred and twenty-six patients underwent transplant during this study interval; 31% of patients were sarcopenic. Two hundred eight patients underwent LFI evaluation: 25% were frail, 59% were prefrail, and 16% were robust. Sarcopenic patients had higher LFI scores indicating greater frailty (p = 0.02). Both sarcopenia and LFI-frailty were associated with significantly higher MELD-Na scores. Length of post-LT hospital stay was increased in sarcopenic (mean 14 vs. nonsarcopenic 11 days, p = 0.02) and LFI-frail patients (mean 13 vs. 10 prefrail, 8 robust, p = 0.04). As a categorical variable, neither LFI-frailty nor sarcopenia were significantly associated with reduced survival at 1-year (robust 100%, prefrail 93.5%, frail 91.1%, p = 0.31) (nonsarcopenic 94.4%, sarcopenic 91.4%, p = 0.30). However, LFI score was significantly associated with mortality at 1-year (OR 2.133, p = 0.047).

Conclusions

Radiographic sarcopenia is a suitable proxy for in-person frailty assessment as both L3-PMI and LFI capture frail patients’ pre-LT. However, physical assessment with frailty better predicts 1-year mortality post-LT than the measurement of muscle mass.

Abstract Image

比较功能性虚弱与放射学上的 "肌肉疏松症 "对肝移植后预后的影响。
导言:体弱和肌肉疏松与终末期肝病患者住院和死亡风险增加有关。识别有不良后果风险的体弱患者的能力有助于优化肝移植(LT)评估和移植前护理。本研究通过L3-腓肠肌指数(L3-PMI)比较了肌肉疏松症和肝脏虚弱指数(LFI),并分析了肝移植(LT)后的相关结果:方法:在一个移植中心对连续接受LT的患者进行回顾性检查,并对其腹部/骨盆横断面成像进行了为期5年的复查:结果:研究期间有 426 名患者接受了移植手术,其中 31% 的患者为肌无力患者。28 名患者接受了 LFI 评估:25% 的患者体质虚弱,59% 的患者体质偏弱,16% 的患者体质健壮。肌肉疏松症患者的 LFI 分数较高,表明他们更虚弱(p = 0.02)。肌肉疏松症和 LFI-虚弱都与 MELD-Na 评分显著升高有关。肌肉疏松症患者(平均 14 天,非肌肉疏松症患者 11 天,P = 0.02)和 LFI 虚弱症患者(平均 13 天,前期 10 天,后期 8 天,P = 0.04)的 LT 后住院时间均有所增加。作为一个分类变量,LFI-虚弱或肌肉疏松症均与1年生存率降低无显著相关性(强壮100%,前虚弱93.5%,虚弱91.1%,p = 0.31)(非肌肉疏松94.4%,肌肉疏松91.4%,p = 0.30)。然而,LFI 评分与 1 年后的死亡率明显相关(OR 2.133,p = 0.047):结论:由于 L3-PMI 和 LFI 都能捕捉到体弱患者长时效应前的情况,因此放射学上的肌肉疏松症是现场体弱评估的合适替代指标。然而,与测量肌肉质量相比,体格虚弱评估能更好地预测长程输液后 1 年的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信