Oncology pharmacy staffing survey across practice settings in the United States.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1177/10781552241266212
Andrew Wechter, Anne M McDonnell, Emily Zimdars, Leanne Sakamoto, Mark Hamm
{"title":"Oncology pharmacy staffing survey across practice settings in the United States.","authors":"Andrew Wechter, Anne M McDonnell, Emily Zimdars, Leanne Sakamoto, Mark Hamm","doi":"10.1177/10781552241266212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThis study was developed to provide a resource for staffing model metrics for oncology pharmacies at healthcare organizations.MethodsThe Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association Practice Outcomes and Professional Benchmarking Committee (POPBC) Oncology Pharmacy Staffing Model Task Force designed and distributed a survey to collect baseline data and staffing metrics for oncology pharmacies. The survey was first tested by four POPBC volunteers. The Staffing Model Survey was distributed in multiple phases between September 2021 and January 2022. The task force focused on several different domains including facilities, general metrics, outpatient infusion services, inpatient and outpatient services, informatics/technology, and training and residency programs. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the data.ResultsA total of 67 responses were received from 68 surveys distributed (98.5%). Of the responders, the majority were from academic medical centers (AMCs) (<i>n</i> = 37, 55%) and community-based centers (CBCs) (<i>n</i> = 21, 31.3%). AMCs reported servicing more inpatient facilities than CBCs (2.1 vs 1.2). For all respondents, 20% tracked in-patient turn-around time compared with 39% of ambulatory sites. Patient education was tracked in all responding settings: 31% for inpatient and 27% for ambulatory. Most sites reported that pharmacy personnel were responsible for cleanroom cleaning (63%) or shared responsibility with an environmental service (37%). Of the 32 sites with ambulatory services, 19 sites were open on Saturday and 15 sites were open on Sundays. Sixty-eight percent of information technology respondents (<i>n</i> = 28) indicated that they use Epic/Beacon (EPIC Oncology Module) as their electronic health record. For the respondents, 89% used closed-system-transfer devices when compounding, 15% used gravimetric technology, and 11% used robotic technology.ConclusionOncology pharmacy operations and staffing models are unique to each pharmacy and practice setting. The results of the pharmacy staffing model survey provide an insight into operations across the country and highlight a need for staffing model benchmarking and metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"769-774"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241266212","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study was developed to provide a resource for staffing model metrics for oncology pharmacies at healthcare organizations.MethodsThe Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association Practice Outcomes and Professional Benchmarking Committee (POPBC) Oncology Pharmacy Staffing Model Task Force designed and distributed a survey to collect baseline data and staffing metrics for oncology pharmacies. The survey was first tested by four POPBC volunteers. The Staffing Model Survey was distributed in multiple phases between September 2021 and January 2022. The task force focused on several different domains including facilities, general metrics, outpatient infusion services, inpatient and outpatient services, informatics/technology, and training and residency programs. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the data.ResultsA total of 67 responses were received from 68 surveys distributed (98.5%). Of the responders, the majority were from academic medical centers (AMCs) (n = 37, 55%) and community-based centers (CBCs) (n = 21, 31.3%). AMCs reported servicing more inpatient facilities than CBCs (2.1 vs 1.2). For all respondents, 20% tracked in-patient turn-around time compared with 39% of ambulatory sites. Patient education was tracked in all responding settings: 31% for inpatient and 27% for ambulatory. Most sites reported that pharmacy personnel were responsible for cleanroom cleaning (63%) or shared responsibility with an environmental service (37%). Of the 32 sites with ambulatory services, 19 sites were open on Saturday and 15 sites were open on Sundays. Sixty-eight percent of information technology respondents (n = 28) indicated that they use Epic/Beacon (EPIC Oncology Module) as their electronic health record. For the respondents, 89% used closed-system-transfer devices when compounding, 15% used gravimetric technology, and 11% used robotic technology.ConclusionOncology pharmacy operations and staffing models are unique to each pharmacy and practice setting. The results of the pharmacy staffing model survey provide an insight into operations across the country and highlight a need for staffing model benchmarking and metrics.

美国各执业机构肿瘤药房人员配备调查。
目的:本研究旨在为医疗机构的肿瘤药房人员配备模式指标提供资源:血液学/肿瘤药学协会实践成果与专业基准委员会 (POPBC) 肿瘤药房人员配备模式工作组设计并分发了一份调查表,以收集肿瘤药房的基线数据和人员配备指标。该调查首先由四名 POPBC 志愿者进行了测试。人员配置模式调查在 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 1 月期间分多个阶段进行。特别工作组重点关注了几个不同的领域,包括设施、一般指标、门诊输液服务、住院和门诊服务、信息学/技术以及培训和住院医师培训计划。我们使用了描述性统计来评估数据:在发放的 68 份调查问卷中,共收到 67 份回复(98.5%)。在回复者中,大多数来自学术医疗中心(AMCs)(n = 37,55%)和社区医疗中心(CBCs)(n = 21,31.3%)。据报告,学术医疗中心比社区医疗中心为更多的住院患者提供服务(2.1 对 1.2)。在所有受访者中,20% 的医疗机构跟踪住院病人的周转时间,而 39% 的非住院医疗机构跟踪住院病人的周转时间。所有受访机构都对患者教育进行了跟踪:住院患者和非住院患者分别有 31% 和 27%。大多数医疗点报告称,药房人员负责洁净室的清洁工作(63%)或与环境服务部门共同负责(37%)。在 32 家提供门诊服务的医疗点中,19 家在周六开放,15 家在周日开放。68%的信息技术受访者(n = 28)表示,他们使用 Epic/Beacon(EPIC 肿瘤模块)作为电子病历。89%的受访者在配制药物时使用封闭系统传输设备,15%的受访者使用重力技术,11%的受访者使用机器人技术:结论:肿瘤药房的运营和人员配置模式因药房和实践环境的不同而各具特色。药房人员配备模式调查结果提供了对全国各地运营情况的深入了解,并强调了对人员配备模式基准和指标的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信