Katherine Hicks-Courant, Emily Meichun Ko, Koji Matsuo, Alexander Melamed, Dimitrios Nasioudis, Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Shitanshu Uppal, Jason D Wright, Pedro T Ramirez
{"title":"Secondary databases in gynecologic cancer research.","authors":"Katherine Hicks-Courant, Emily Meichun Ko, Koji Matsuo, Alexander Melamed, Dimitrios Nasioudis, Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Shitanshu Uppal, Jason D Wright, Pedro T Ramirez","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2024-005677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Observational and cohort studies using large databases have made important contributions to gynecologic oncology. Knowledge of the advantages and potential limitations of commonly used databases benefits both readers and reviewers. In this review, researchers familiar with National Cancer Database (NCDB), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER), SEER-Medicare, MarketScan, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), and Premier, describe each database, its included data, access, management, storage, highlights, and limitations. A better understanding of these commonly used datasets can help readers, reviewers, and researchers to more effectively interpret and apply study results, evaluate new research studies, and develop compelling and practice-changing research.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"1619-1629"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-005677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Observational and cohort studies using large databases have made important contributions to gynecologic oncology. Knowledge of the advantages and potential limitations of commonly used databases benefits both readers and reviewers. In this review, researchers familiar with National Cancer Database (NCDB), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER), SEER-Medicare, MarketScan, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), and Premier, describe each database, its included data, access, management, storage, highlights, and limitations. A better understanding of these commonly used datasets can help readers, reviewers, and researchers to more effectively interpret and apply study results, evaluate new research studies, and develop compelling and practice-changing research.
使用大型数据库进行的观察性研究和队列研究为妇科肿瘤学做出了重要贡献。了解常用数据库的优势和潜在局限性对读者和审稿人都有好处。在这篇综述中，熟悉美国国家癌症数据库（NCDB）、监测、流行病学和最终结果计划（SEER）、SEER-Medicare、MarketScan、医疗成本和利用项目（HCUP）、国家外科质量改进计划（NSQIP）和 Premier 的研究人员介绍了每个数据库、其包含的数据、访问、管理、存储、亮点和局限性。更好地了解这些常用数据集可以帮助读者、审稿人和研究人员更有效地解释和应用研究结果、评估新的研究调查，以及开发有吸引力和改变实践的研究。
期刊介绍：
The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
