Disparities in access to reproductive genetic services associated with geographic location of residence and maternal race and ethnicity

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Asha N. Talati , Divya P. Mallampati , Emily E. Hardisty , Kelly L. Gilmore , Neeta L. Vora
{"title":"Disparities in access to reproductive genetic services associated with geographic location of residence and maternal race and ethnicity","authors":"Asha N. Talati ,&nbsp;Divya P. Mallampati ,&nbsp;Emily E. Hardisty ,&nbsp;Kelly L. Gilmore ,&nbsp;Neeta L. Vora","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2024.101221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To describe the association between geographic location of residence and use of aneuploidy screening or prenatal genetic counseling and how it is modified by maternal race and ethnicity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective cohort of individuals at a tertiary care center between 2017-2019. County of residence was classified as rural or metropolitan based in US Office of Management and Budget 2019 definitions. Maternal race and ethnicity were self-identified. Our composite outcome was defined as use of aneuploidy screening or genetic counseling visit. The composite outcome was compared by geographic location and ethnicity. Logistic regression was used to model the relationship between geographic location and the composite outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 8774 pregnancies were included. Of these, 4770 (54%) had genetic screening, and 3781 (43%) had at least 1 genetic counseling visit. Rural patients were significantly less likely to have the composite outcome compared with metropolitan peers (37.1% vs 47.2%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). In addition, we identified differences in the composite outcome between White rural patients and LatinX rural patients (37.7% vs 35.6%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and between Asian rural patients and LatinX and Black rural patients (41.0% vs 35.6%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001; 41.0% vs 36.8%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Logistic regression demonstrated that rural patients were significantly less likely to have the composite outcome compared with metropolitan peers, after adjusting for LatinX ethnicity and gestational age at first prenatal visit (OR 0.72, [0.55, 0.95], <em>P</em> = .002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Rural, minority patients were significantly less likely to receive reproductive genetic services compared with metropolitan peers extending our knowledge of disparities in maternity care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":"26 11","pages":"Article 101221"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360024001552","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the association between geographic location of residence and use of aneuploidy screening or prenatal genetic counseling and how it is modified by maternal race and ethnicity.

Methods

Retrospective cohort of individuals at a tertiary care center between 2017-2019. County of residence was classified as rural or metropolitan based in US Office of Management and Budget 2019 definitions. Maternal race and ethnicity were self-identified. Our composite outcome was defined as use of aneuploidy screening or genetic counseling visit. The composite outcome was compared by geographic location and ethnicity. Logistic regression was used to model the relationship between geographic location and the composite outcome.

Results

A total of 8774 pregnancies were included. Of these, 4770 (54%) had genetic screening, and 3781 (43%) had at least 1 genetic counseling visit. Rural patients were significantly less likely to have the composite outcome compared with metropolitan peers (37.1% vs 47.2%, P < .001). In addition, we identified differences in the composite outcome between White rural patients and LatinX rural patients (37.7% vs 35.6%, P < .001) and between Asian rural patients and LatinX and Black rural patients (41.0% vs 35.6%, P < .001; 41.0% vs 36.8%, P < .001). Logistic regression demonstrated that rural patients were significantly less likely to have the composite outcome compared with metropolitan peers, after adjusting for LatinX ethnicity and gestational age at first prenatal visit (OR 0.72, [0.55, 0.95], P = .002).

Conclusion

Rural, minority patients were significantly less likely to receive reproductive genetic services compared with metropolitan peers extending our knowledge of disparities in maternity care.
与居住地理位置和孕产妇种族有关的生殖遗传服务获取方面的差异。
目的:描述居住地理位置与使用非整倍体筛查或产前遗传咨询之间的关系,以及这种关系如何因产妇的种族和民族而改变:2017-19年间在一家三级医疗中心进行的回顾性队列研究。根据美国管理和预算办公室 2019 年的定义,居住地县被划分为农村或大都市。母亲的种族和民族为自我认同。我们的综合结果被定义为使用非整倍体筛查或遗传咨询就诊。综合结果按地理位置和种族进行比较。逻辑回归用于模拟地理位置与综合结果之间的关系:结果:共纳入 8774 例妊娠。4770例(54%)进行了遗传筛查,3781例(43%)至少进行了一次遗传咨询(GC)。与大都市患者相比,农村患者获得综合结果的可能性明显较低(37.1% 对 47.2%,p 结论:与大都市的同龄人相比,农村的少数民族患者接受生殖遗传服务的几率明显较低,这扩展了我们对孕产妇护理差异的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genetics in Medicine
Genetics in Medicine 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.80%
发文量
857
审稿时长
1.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health. GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信