Beneficial therapeutic plasma exchange response in the treatment of severe relapses in patients with multiple sclerosis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sarlota Mesaros, Tatjana Pekmezovic, Vanja Martinovic, Jovana Ivanovic, Olivera Tamas, Marija Dinic, Jelena Drulovic
{"title":"Beneficial therapeutic plasma exchange response in the treatment of severe relapses in patients with multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Sarlota Mesaros, Tatjana Pekmezovic, Vanja Martinovic, Jovana Ivanovic, Olivera Tamas, Marija Dinic, Jelena Drulovic","doi":"10.1007/s13760-024-02606-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Therapeutic plasma exchange (PLEX) is effective as a second-line treatment of severe relapses of multiple sclerosis (MS) that failed to respond to standard steroid therapy. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of PLEX in the severe MS relapses in a cohort of patients treated at Neurology Clinic, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, from 2007 until 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study comprised 107 MS patients with 127 severe relapses treated with PLEX. Majority of our patients suffered from relapsing remitting MS (83.2%), 12.1% had secondary progressive MS and 4.7% had primary progressive MS. Mean age was 39.2 years (range, 19-79 years), female/male ratio 2.3:1. Pulse corticosteroid treatment was used before PLEX in 99.3% of patients. Median EDSS score at nadire during relapse was 6.0 (range 2.0-10.0). After PLEX, 73.8% relapses showed a marked clinical improvement, 7.1% showed mild improvement and in 19.0% there was no improvement. Median EDSS at discharge was 4.0 (6.0 at nadir of relapse vs. 4.0 at discharge; p<0.0001) and it was sustained at the same level, 6 month after PLEX. Multivariate regression analysis showed that higher EDSS at nadir during relapse (OR=0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.96, p=0.039) and older age (OR=1.07, 95% CI 1.02- 1.12, p=0.010) were significantly associated with poor treatment response after 6- month follow-up. Adverse events occurred in 17.3 of procedures and they were completely resolved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study in a large cohort of MS patients confirmed that PLEX is effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":7042,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-024-02606-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Therapeutic plasma exchange (PLEX) is effective as a second-line treatment of severe relapses of multiple sclerosis (MS) that failed to respond to standard steroid therapy. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of PLEX in the severe MS relapses in a cohort of patients treated at Neurology Clinic, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, from 2007 until 2020.

Methods: This retrospective study comprised 107 MS patients with 127 severe relapses treated with PLEX. Majority of our patients suffered from relapsing remitting MS (83.2%), 12.1% had secondary progressive MS and 4.7% had primary progressive MS. Mean age was 39.2 years (range, 19-79 years), female/male ratio 2.3:1. Pulse corticosteroid treatment was used before PLEX in 99.3% of patients. Median EDSS score at nadire during relapse was 6.0 (range 2.0-10.0). After PLEX, 73.8% relapses showed a marked clinical improvement, 7.1% showed mild improvement and in 19.0% there was no improvement. Median EDSS at discharge was 4.0 (6.0 at nadir of relapse vs. 4.0 at discharge; p<0.0001) and it was sustained at the same level, 6 month after PLEX. Multivariate regression analysis showed that higher EDSS at nadir during relapse (OR=0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.96, p=0.039) and older age (OR=1.07, 95% CI 1.02- 1.12, p=0.010) were significantly associated with poor treatment response after 6- month follow-up. Adverse events occurred in 17.3 of procedures and they were completely resolved.

Conclusion: Our study in a large cohort of MS patients confirmed that PLEX is effective.

Abstract Image

治疗多发性硬化症严重复发患者的有益治疗性血浆置换反应。
目的:治疗性血浆置换(PLEX)作为标准类固醇疗法无效的多发性硬化症(MS)严重复发的二线治疗方法非常有效。我们的目的是评估 2007 年至 2020 年期间在贝尔格莱德塞尔维亚大学临床中心神经病学诊所接受治疗的一组患者中,PLEX 对多发性硬化症严重复发的疗效:这项回顾性研究包括 107 名接受 PLEX 治疗的多发性硬化症患者,其中 127 名患者病情严重复发。大多数患者患有复发缓解型多发性硬化症(83.2%),12.1%患有继发性进展型多发性硬化症,4.7%患有原发性进展型多发性硬化症。平均年龄为39.2岁(19-79岁),男女比例为2.3:1。99.3%的患者在PLEX前使用脉冲皮质类固醇治疗。复发时的EDSS评分中位数为6.0(范围2.0-10.0)。PLEX 治疗后,73.8% 的复发患者临床症状明显改善,7.1% 的患者症状轻微改善,19.0% 的患者症状无改善。出院时的 EDSS 中位数为 4.0(复发最低点时为 6.0,出院时为 4.0;p 结论:我们对大量多发性硬化症患者进行的研究证实,PLEX 是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta neurologica Belgica
Acta neurologica Belgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer-reviewed and published quarterly, Acta Neurologica Belgicapresents original articles in the clinical and basic neurosciences, and also reports the proceedings and the abstracts of the scientific meetings of the different partner societies. The contents include commentaries, editorials, review articles, case reports, neuro-images of interest, book reviews and letters to the editor. Acta Neurologica Belgica is the official journal of the following national societies: Belgian Neurological Society Belgian Society for Neuroscience Belgian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology Belgian Pediatric Neurology Society Belgian Study Group of Multiple Sclerosis Belgian Stroke Council Belgian Headache Society Belgian Study Group of Neuropathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信