{"title":"Protocols for breaking bad news in health care: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Ana Filipa Cardoso, Inês Rosendo, Luiz Santiago, Joana Neto, Daniela Cardoso","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review will map the available evidence on communication protocols for breaking bad news to adult patients and their families in health care.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Breaking bad news to adult patients and their families is a challenging task for health care professionals. To address these challenges, communication protocols have been developed to support health care professionals in breaking bad news in a compassionate and effective manner while respecting each patient's individuality.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This scoping review will consider all studies that focus on communication protocols (original or adapted versions) to break bad news to adult patients and/or their families (adults) in any health care context, regardless of the approach (face-to-face, telephone, video, or other). Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies, systematic reviews, and text and opinion papers will be considered for inclusion in this review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The search strategy will aim to locate both published and unpublished evidence in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. The databases to be searched include CINAHL Plus Complete (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (PubMed), Academic Search Complete, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. Gray literature will also be searched for. Two independent reviewers will independently perform study selection and data extraction. Data will be extracted using a data extraction tool developed by the reviewers. Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion or with an additional reviewer. Data will be presented in tabular and narrative format.</p><p><strong>Details of the review can be found in open science framework: </strong>https://osf.io/s6ru7/.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This scoping review will map the available evidence on communication protocols for breaking bad news to adult patients and their families in health care.
Introduction: Breaking bad news to adult patients and their families is a challenging task for health care professionals. To address these challenges, communication protocols have been developed to support health care professionals in breaking bad news in a compassionate and effective manner while respecting each patient's individuality.
Inclusion criteria: This scoping review will consider all studies that focus on communication protocols (original or adapted versions) to break bad news to adult patients and/or their families (adults) in any health care context, regardless of the approach (face-to-face, telephone, video, or other). Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies, systematic reviews, and text and opinion papers will be considered for inclusion in this review.
Methods: This review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The search strategy will aim to locate both published and unpublished evidence in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. The databases to be searched include CINAHL Plus Complete (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (PubMed), Academic Search Complete, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. Gray literature will also be searched for. Two independent reviewers will independently perform study selection and data extraction. Data will be extracted using a data extraction tool developed by the reviewers. Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion or with an additional reviewer. Data will be presented in tabular and narrative format.
Details of the review can be found in open science framework: https://osf.io/s6ru7/.
目的本范围界定综述将对在医疗保健领域向成年患者及其家属透露坏消息的沟通协议的现有证据进行摸底：对医护人员来说，向成年患者及其家属告知坏消息是一项具有挑战性的任务。为了应对这些挑战，人们制定了沟通协议，以支持医护人员以富有同情心和有效的方式告知坏消息，同时尊重每位患者的个性：本次范围界定综述将考虑所有关注在任何医疗环境下向成年患者和/或其家属（成人）告知坏消息的沟通协议（原始版本或改编版本）的研究，无论采用何种方式（面对面、电话、视频或其他）。本综述将考虑纳入定量、定性和混合方法研究、系统综述以及文本和观点论文：本综述将按照 JBI 的范围界定综述方法进行。检索策略旨在查找英语、西班牙语和葡萄牙语已发表和未发表的证据。要检索的数据库包括 CINAHL Plus Complete (EBSCOhost)、MEDLINE (PubMed)、Academic Search Complete、Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection、Scopus 和 Web of Science Core Collection。还将检索灰色文献。两名独立审稿人将独立完成研究选择和数据提取。数据提取将使用审稿人开发的数据提取工具。审稿人之间出现的任何分歧将通过讨论或与另一位审稿人共同解决。数据将以表格和叙述的形式呈现。有关评审的详细信息，请参阅开放科学框架：https://osf.io/s6ru7/。
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
