Evaluating the Efficacy of the Diluted Schirmer Method for Tear Collection in Dry Eye Syndrome Patients.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Current Eye Research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1080/02713683.2024.2380446
Li Yang, Xiuming Jin, Shengjia Hu, Pingping Yu, Xinchang Wang
{"title":"Evaluating the Efficacy of the Diluted Schirmer Method for Tear Collection in Dry Eye Syndrome Patients.","authors":"Li Yang, Xiuming Jin, Shengjia Hu, Pingping Yu, Xinchang Wang","doi":"10.1080/02713683.2024.2380446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assesses the diluted Schirmer method's effectiveness in collecting tears from dry eye syndrome patients, aiming to identify the most suitable tear collection technique for them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study. Tear samples were collected from patients with dry eye syndrome and healthy individuals using two methods: (1) Direct Schirmer Method: Schirmer strips were directly inserted into the eye to collect tears. (2) Diluted Schirmer Method: After instilling physiological saline into the eye and waiting for 30 s to ensure thorough mixing with tears, Schirmer strips were used for collection. Tear samples from both groups were analyzed and compared for total protein and cytokine levels (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) The study included 32 participants: 16 with dry eye syndrome (4 males, 12 females, average age 34.92 ± 10.13 years) and 16 healthy controls (5 males, 11 females, average age 32.25 ± 9.87 years). (2) The diluted Schirmer method produced a significantly larger tear volume compared to the direct method (<i>p</i> < 0.05), with lower Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores indicating less discomfort (<i>p</i> < 0.05). (3) The average total protein content of the two groups was 51.70 ± 3.166 ng measured by Direct Schirmer method, and the average total protein content of the Diluted Schirmer method was 50.05 ± 3.263 ng. There was no statistical difference between the two groups. (<i>t</i> = 1.051, <i>p</i> = 0.3098) (4) The concentrations of total tear protein and various cytokines measured by both methods were higher in the dry eye group compared to the normal group, with statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Both methods reflected consistent changes in tear protein profiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diluted Schirmer method can comfortably collect an adequate volume of tear samples in a short time and consistently reflect changes in tear proteins, making it an effective method for tear collection in patients with dry eye syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":10782,"journal":{"name":"Current Eye Research","volume":" ","pages":"1223-1230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Eye Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2024.2380446","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study assesses the diluted Schirmer method's effectiveness in collecting tears from dry eye syndrome patients, aiming to identify the most suitable tear collection technique for them.

Methods: A prospective study. Tear samples were collected from patients with dry eye syndrome and healthy individuals using two methods: (1) Direct Schirmer Method: Schirmer strips were directly inserted into the eye to collect tears. (2) Diluted Schirmer Method: After instilling physiological saline into the eye and waiting for 30 s to ensure thorough mixing with tears, Schirmer strips were used for collection. Tear samples from both groups were analyzed and compared for total protein and cytokine levels (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α).

Results: (1) The study included 32 participants: 16 with dry eye syndrome (4 males, 12 females, average age 34.92 ± 10.13 years) and 16 healthy controls (5 males, 11 females, average age 32.25 ± 9.87 years). (2) The diluted Schirmer method produced a significantly larger tear volume compared to the direct method (p < 0.05), with lower Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores indicating less discomfort (p < 0.05). (3) The average total protein content of the two groups was 51.70 ± 3.166 ng measured by Direct Schirmer method, and the average total protein content of the Diluted Schirmer method was 50.05 ± 3.263 ng. There was no statistical difference between the two groups. (t = 1.051, p = 0.3098) (4) The concentrations of total tear protein and various cytokines measured by both methods were higher in the dry eye group compared to the normal group, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Both methods reflected consistent changes in tear protein profiles.

Conclusion: The diluted Schirmer method can comfortably collect an adequate volume of tear samples in a short time and consistently reflect changes in tear proteins, making it an effective method for tear collection in patients with dry eye syndrome.

评估稀释施尔默法对干眼症患者泪液采集的功效
目的:本研究评估了稀释施尔默法在收集干眼症患者泪液方面的有效性,旨在找出最适合干眼症患者的泪液收集技术:方法:前瞻性研究。采用两种方法收集干眼症患者和健康人的泪液样本:(1)直接施尔默法:将施尔默条直接插入眼球收集泪液。(2)稀释施尔默法:将生理盐水注入眼球,等待 30 秒以确保与泪液充分混合后,使用施尔默条收集泪液。对两组泪液样本的总蛋白和细胞因子水平(IL-1β、IL-6、IL-8、TNF-α)进行分析和比较:干眼症患者 16 人(男性 4 人,女性 12 人,平均年龄(34.92 ± 10.13)岁),健康对照组 16 人(男性 5 人,女性 11 人,平均年龄(32.25 ± 9.87)岁)。(2) 与直接法相比,稀释施尔默法产生的泪液量明显更大(p p t = 1.051,p = 0.3098) (4) 与正常组相比,两种方法测得的干眼组泪液总蛋白和各种细胞因子的浓度都更高,差异有统计学意义(p 结论:稀释施尔默法可用于干眼症患者的泪液检查:稀释施尔默法能在短时间内采集到足够量的泪液样本,并能持续反映泪液蛋白质的变化,是采集干眼症患者泪液样本的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Eye Research
Current Eye Research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The principal aim of Current Eye Research is to provide rapid publication of full papers, short communications and mini-reviews, all high quality. Current Eye Research publishes articles encompassing all the areas of eye research. Subject areas include the following: clinical research, anatomy, physiology, biophysics, biochemistry, pharmacology, developmental biology, microbiology and immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信