Perceived algorithmic evaluation and app‐workers' service performance: The roles of flow experience and challenges of gig work

IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Zhipeng Zhang, Guangjian Liu, Jialiang Pei, Shuxia Zhang, Jun Liu
{"title":"Perceived algorithmic evaluation and app‐workers' service performance: The roles of flow experience and challenges of gig work","authors":"Zhipeng Zhang, Guangjian Liu, Jialiang Pei, Shuxia Zhang, Jun Liu","doi":"10.1002/job.2816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SummaryAlgorithmic evaluations are becoming increasingly common among app‐workers. However, there is limited research on how app‐workers' perceptions of these evaluations (perceived algorithmic evaluation, or PAE) affect service performance. Our study addresses this gap in three ways: first, we introduce a new method to measure PAE among app‐workers. Second, building on flow theory, we explore how app‐workers' flow experience mediates the relationship between PAE and service performance. Third, by integrating the conservation of resources theory and flow theory, we examine how viability challenges might reduce the positive impact of PAE on app‐workers' flow experience. Using both interviews and surveys, our research reveals that PAE positively influences app‐workers' flow experience and, in turn, their service performance. Notably, we find that when workers face more viability challenges, the positive effects of PAE on their flow experience and service performance decrease. Our findings highlight the importance of algorithmic evaluation in shaping app‐workers' work experiences and outcomes in the gig economy and have significant theoretical and practical implications.","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2816","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SummaryAlgorithmic evaluations are becoming increasingly common among app‐workers. However, there is limited research on how app‐workers' perceptions of these evaluations (perceived algorithmic evaluation, or PAE) affect service performance. Our study addresses this gap in three ways: first, we introduce a new method to measure PAE among app‐workers. Second, building on flow theory, we explore how app‐workers' flow experience mediates the relationship between PAE and service performance. Third, by integrating the conservation of resources theory and flow theory, we examine how viability challenges might reduce the positive impact of PAE on app‐workers' flow experience. Using both interviews and surveys, our research reveals that PAE positively influences app‐workers' flow experience and, in turn, their service performance. Notably, we find that when workers face more viability challenges, the positive effects of PAE on their flow experience and service performance decrease. Our findings highlight the importance of algorithmic evaluation in shaping app‐workers' work experiences and outcomes in the gig economy and have significant theoretical and practical implications.
感知算法评价与应用程序工作者的服务表现:流程体验和工作挑战的作用
摘要算法评价在应用程序工作者中越来越常见。然而,关于应用程序工作人员对这些评价的感知(感知算法评价,或 PAE)如何影响服务性能的研究却十分有限。我们的研究从三个方面填补了这一空白:首先,我们引入了一种新方法来测量应用程序工作人员的 PAE。其次,在流量理论的基础上,我们探讨了应用程序工作人员的流量体验如何介导 PAE 与服务绩效之间的关系。第三,通过整合资源保护理论和流动理论,我们研究了可行性挑战如何降低 PAE 对应用程序工作人员流动体验的积极影响。通过访谈和调查,我们的研究发现,PAE 对应用程序工作人员的流动体验产生了积极影响,进而影响了他们的服务绩效。值得注意的是,我们发现当工作人员面临更多可行性挑战时,PAE 对其流程体验和服务绩效的积极影响就会降低。我们的研究结果凸显了算法评估在塑造应用程序工作者在 "打工经济 "中的工作体验和结果方面的重要性,具有重要的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organizational Behavior aims to publish empirical reports and theoretical reviews of research in the field of organizational behavior, wherever in the world that work is conducted. The journal will focus on research and theory in all topics associated with organizational behavior within and across individual, group and organizational levels of analysis, including: -At the individual level: personality, perception, beliefs, attitudes, values, motivation, career behavior, stress, emotions, judgment, and commitment. -At the group level: size, composition, structure, leadership, power, group affect, and politics. -At the organizational level: structure, change, goal-setting, creativity, and human resource management policies and practices. -Across levels: decision-making, performance, job satisfaction, turnover and absenteeism, diversity, careers and career development, equal opportunities, work-life balance, identification, organizational culture and climate, inter-organizational processes, and multi-national and cross-national issues. -Research methodologies in studies of organizational behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信