Effects of conservation agriculture technologies on soil macrofauna community attributes in rainfed agriculture system

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Yahya Parvizi, Mosayeb Heshmati, Mohammad Gheituri, Mohammadtaghi Toohidi
{"title":"Effects of conservation agriculture technologies on soil macrofauna community attributes in rainfed agriculture system","authors":"Yahya Parvizi,&nbsp;Mosayeb Heshmati,&nbsp;Mohammad Gheituri,&nbsp;Mohammadtaghi Toohidi","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Inappropriate rainfed crop management, especially wrong tillage and crop residue management, led to reduce the diversity of soil biological quality, especially soil macrofauna community, in semiarid region. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of 5 year conservation agriculture operation techniques on the quality and the diversity indices of soil macrofauna community in the rainfed lands in the west of Iran. This experiment was carried out in the statistical format of split-split plots based on a randomized completely block design with three replications. The main treatments include control or conventional tillage, compound tillage, chisel tillage, and direct cultivation (no tillage) with three sub-treatments of plant residues (no residues, one-third, and two-thirds of plant residues) in rainfed wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i>) rotation with rainfed chickpea (<i>Cicer arietinum</i>). Changes in soil biological quality indicators, such as soil microbial respiration were measured. Also, the indicators related to the population of soil macrofauna, including biodiversity index, uniformity index, and species richness, were measured and the effect of treatments on the measured indicators were compared with the classical statistical method of analysis of variance and Duncan's mean comparison test. The results showed that conservation agricultural treatments, including no-tillage treatment, have led to significant increase of 19% and 15% of macrofauna biodiversity index in wheat and chickpea, respectively. Also, keeping one-third of the wheat residues has led to an 18% increase in the biodiversity index of the soil macrofauna during the evaluation period. Biodiversity index and taxonomic richness of soil macrofauna were generally higher in the years of wheat than chickpea, and on the contrary, the species uniformity index of soil macrofauna biological community was higher in chickpea than wheat.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 5","pages":"2229-2241"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21642","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inappropriate rainfed crop management, especially wrong tillage and crop residue management, led to reduce the diversity of soil biological quality, especially soil macrofauna community, in semiarid region. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of 5 year conservation agriculture operation techniques on the quality and the diversity indices of soil macrofauna community in the rainfed lands in the west of Iran. This experiment was carried out in the statistical format of split-split plots based on a randomized completely block design with three replications. The main treatments include control or conventional tillage, compound tillage, chisel tillage, and direct cultivation (no tillage) with three sub-treatments of plant residues (no residues, one-third, and two-thirds of plant residues) in rainfed wheat (Triticum aestivum) rotation with rainfed chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Changes in soil biological quality indicators, such as soil microbial respiration were measured. Also, the indicators related to the population of soil macrofauna, including biodiversity index, uniformity index, and species richness, were measured and the effect of treatments on the measured indicators were compared with the classical statistical method of analysis of variance and Duncan's mean comparison test. The results showed that conservation agricultural treatments, including no-tillage treatment, have led to significant increase of 19% and 15% of macrofauna biodiversity index in wheat and chickpea, respectively. Also, keeping one-third of the wheat residues has led to an 18% increase in the biodiversity index of the soil macrofauna during the evaluation period. Biodiversity index and taxonomic richness of soil macrofauna were generally higher in the years of wheat than chickpea, and on the contrary, the species uniformity index of soil macrofauna biological community was higher in chickpea than wheat.

保护性农业技术对雨水灌溉农业系统土壤大型动物群落属性的影响
不恰当的雨水灌溉作物管理,尤其是错误的耕作和作物残留物管理,导致半干旱地区土壤生物质量,尤其是土壤大型动物群落的多样性降低。本研究旨在调查 5 年保护性农业操作技术对伊朗西部雨浇地土壤大型动物群落的质量和多样性指数的影响。该试验采用了基于随机完全区组设计的三重复分隔小区统计形式。主要处理包括对照或常规耕作、复合耕作、凿形耕作和直接耕作(不耕作),以及雨养小麦(Triticum aestivum)与雨养鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum)轮作时的三种植物残留物子处理(无残留物、三分之一植物残留物和三分之二植物残留物)。测量了土壤微生物呼吸等土壤生物质量指标的变化。此外,还测量了与土壤大型动物种群有关的指标,包括生物多样性指数、均匀度指数和物种丰富度,并采用方差分析和邓肯均值比较检验等经典统计方法比较了处理对测量指标的影响。结果表明,包括免耕处理在内的保护性农业处理使小麦和鹰嘴豆的大型动物生物多样性指数分别显著提高了 19% 和 15%。此外,在评估期间,保留三分之一的小麦残茬也使土壤大型动物的生物多样性指数增加了 18%。小麦种植年份土壤大型底栖生物的生物多样性指数和分类丰富度普遍高于鹰嘴豆种植年份,相反,鹰嘴豆种植年份土壤大型底栖生物群落的物种均匀性指数高于小麦种植年份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信