Evaluation of a Suicide Risk Assessment Tool in a Large Sample of Detained Youth.

IF 2.9 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Hygiea Casiano, Shay-Lee Bolton, Laurence Y Katz, James M Bolton, Jitender Sareen
{"title":"Evaluation of a Suicide Risk Assessment Tool in a Large Sample of Detained Youth.","authors":"Hygiea Casiano, Shay-Lee Bolton, Laurence Y Katz, James M Bolton, Jitender Sareen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated the six-item Inmate Security Assessment (ISA) tool used among detained youth in Manitoba, Canada.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two hundred and forty-one recorded self-harm incidents among all incarcerated youth occurred between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2010 (N=5102). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) for three categories of suicide risk (high, medium, and low) as well as each of the six suicide risk evaluation indicators were determined. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) calculations for the three suicide risk levels and the six indicators were created.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Having at least a low suicide risk level (93.8%) or at least one suicide risk factor (94.6%) provided high sensitivity. Specificity was high if an individual had at least a medium suicide risk level (94.2%) or at least three suicide risk indicators (96.7%). The PPV was low (8.9-16.2%) and the NPV was high (94.9-99.3%) for all suicide risk levels. The most sensitive risk factor for self-harm was a prior history of suicidal behavior or a family history of suicide (94.6%). All risk indicators had a low PPV (7.4-23.1%) and a high NPV (95.4-99.5%). A very low NLR was found for those without prior suicidal behavior or a family history of suicide (0.107). The AUC was 0.719 (95%CI = 0.692-0.746), indicating a fair test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ISA is a moderately accurate tool for identifying risk for self-harm in detained youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":47053,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":"28 3","pages":"105-114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6863576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the six-item Inmate Security Assessment (ISA) tool used among detained youth in Manitoba, Canada.

Method: Two hundred and forty-one recorded self-harm incidents among all incarcerated youth occurred between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2010 (N=5102). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) for three categories of suicide risk (high, medium, and low) as well as each of the six suicide risk evaluation indicators were determined. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) calculations for the three suicide risk levels and the six indicators were created.

Results: Having at least a low suicide risk level (93.8%) or at least one suicide risk factor (94.6%) provided high sensitivity. Specificity was high if an individual had at least a medium suicide risk level (94.2%) or at least three suicide risk indicators (96.7%). The PPV was low (8.9-16.2%) and the NPV was high (94.9-99.3%) for all suicide risk levels. The most sensitive risk factor for self-harm was a prior history of suicidal behavior or a family history of suicide (94.6%). All risk indicators had a low PPV (7.4-23.1%) and a high NPV (95.4-99.5%). A very low NLR was found for those without prior suicidal behavior or a family history of suicide (0.107). The AUC was 0.719 (95%CI = 0.692-0.746), indicating a fair test.

Conclusion: The ISA is a moderately accurate tool for identifying risk for self-harm in detained youth.

在大量被拘留青少年样本中评估自杀风险评估工具。
目的:我们对加拿大马尼托巴省被拘留青少年使用的六项囚犯安全评估工具进行了评估:我们对加拿大马尼托巴省在押青少年使用的六项囚犯安全评估(ISA)工具进行了评估:2005年1月1日至2010年12月31日期间,所有被监禁青少年中发生了241起有记录的自残事件(N=5102)。确定了三个自杀风险类别(高、中、低)以及六个自杀风险评估指标的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性可能性比(PLR)和阴性可能性比(NLR)。为三个自杀风险等级和六个指标绘制了接收者操作特征曲线(ROC),并计算了曲线下面积(AUC):至少拥有一个低自杀风险等级(93.8%)或至少拥有一个自杀风险因素(94.6%)具有较高的灵敏度。如果一个人至少有中等自杀风险水平(94.2%)或至少有三个自杀风险指标(96.7%),则特异性较高。在所有自杀风险水平中,PPV 较低(8.9%-16.2%),NPV 较高(94.9%-99.3%)。最敏感的自残风险因素是既往有自杀行为史或自杀家族史(94.6%)。所有风险指标的 PPV 均较低(7.4%-23.1%),NPV 均较高(95.4%-99.5%)。无自杀行为或无自杀家族史者的 NLR 很低(0.107)。AUC为0.719(95%CI = 0.692-0.746),表明测试结果尚可:ISA是一种中等准确度的工具,可用于识别被拘留青少年的自残风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信