Secondary Analysis of Sweetness Liking from Pilot Study Replacing Sugar Sweetened Soda with Flavored, Unsweetened Sparkling Water.

IF 6.8 4区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Vinícius Valicente, Nana Gletsu-Miller, Cordelia A Running
{"title":"Secondary Analysis of Sweetness Liking from Pilot Study Replacing Sugar Sweetened Soda with Flavored, Unsweetened Sparkling Water.","authors":"Vinícius Valicente, Nana Gletsu-Miller, Cordelia A Running","doi":"10.1080/27697061.2024.2369819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate changes in sensory ratings (liking, sweetness intensity, \"just about right\" (JAR) level of sweetness) of 0-10.7% w/w sugar in soda after 1 and 2 wk of replacing sugar-sweetened soda consumption with unsweetened, flavored, sparkling water.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consumers of sugar-sweetened sodas (17 men and women, average age 28 years) replaced their sodas with unsweetened, flavored sparkling waters for 2 wk. Changes in sensory ratings were evaluated for sodas ranging from 0-10.7% w/w added sugar. In a secondary analysis, cluster analysis identified \"Sweet Likers\" (liking increased with sugar concentration) and \"Sweet Moderates\" (liking peaked in the middle of the concentration range) in the baseline ratings, and models for changes in sensory ratings were reevaluated by sweet-liking group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary analyses showed no significant effects of the intervention on sweetness intensity or liking ratings. However, the secondary analysis showed that Sweet Likers reduced liking ratings for all sodas, but particularly for the highest concentration (<i>p</i> = 0.0021) after the intervention. Sweet Moderates, however, increased liking ratings after the intervention, driven by an increase in liking for the lower concentrations of sugar (<i>p</i> = 0.0058). Additionally, Sweet Moderates increased their overall ratings for sweetness intensity in sodas (<i>p</i> = 0.00074).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that the intervention may have been more successful in shifting sensory perception and acceptance of less-sweet sodas for Sweet Moderates than for Sweet Likers. These results should be verified in a larger sample that intentionally recruits by sweet liker status, to see if initial liking for sweetness may be a critical factor in interventions aiming to improve liking of less sweet beverages.</p>","PeriodicalId":29768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Nutrition Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Nutrition Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/27697061.2024.2369819","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate changes in sensory ratings (liking, sweetness intensity, "just about right" (JAR) level of sweetness) of 0-10.7% w/w sugar in soda after 1 and 2 wk of replacing sugar-sweetened soda consumption with unsweetened, flavored, sparkling water.

Methods: Consumers of sugar-sweetened sodas (17 men and women, average age 28 years) replaced their sodas with unsweetened, flavored sparkling waters for 2 wk. Changes in sensory ratings were evaluated for sodas ranging from 0-10.7% w/w added sugar. In a secondary analysis, cluster analysis identified "Sweet Likers" (liking increased with sugar concentration) and "Sweet Moderates" (liking peaked in the middle of the concentration range) in the baseline ratings, and models for changes in sensory ratings were reevaluated by sweet-liking group.

Results: The primary analyses showed no significant effects of the intervention on sweetness intensity or liking ratings. However, the secondary analysis showed that Sweet Likers reduced liking ratings for all sodas, but particularly for the highest concentration (p = 0.0021) after the intervention. Sweet Moderates, however, increased liking ratings after the intervention, driven by an increase in liking for the lower concentrations of sugar (p = 0.0058). Additionally, Sweet Moderates increased their overall ratings for sweetness intensity in sodas (p = 0.00074).

Conclusion: These results suggest that the intervention may have been more successful in shifting sensory perception and acceptance of less-sweet sodas for Sweet Moderates than for Sweet Likers. These results should be verified in a larger sample that intentionally recruits by sweet liker status, to see if initial liking for sweetness may be a critical factor in interventions aiming to improve liking of less sweet beverages.

用无甜味气泡水替代加糖苏打水的试点研究中对甜味喜好的二次分析
研究目的本研究旨在评估用不加糖的风味气泡水代替含糖苏打水饮用 1 周和 2 周后,苏打水中 0-10.7% w/w 含糖量的感官评分(喜欢程度、甜味强度、甜味 "差不多"(JAR)水平)的变化:含糖苏打水的消费者(17 名男性和女性,平均年龄 28 岁)在 2 周内用不加糖的风味气泡水代替苏打水。对含糖量在 0-10.7% w/w 之间的苏打水的感官评分变化进行了评估。在二次分析中,聚类分析确定了基线评分中的 "甜味喜欢者"(喜欢程度随糖分浓度的增加而增加)和 "甜味适中者"(喜欢程度在浓度范围的中间达到顶峰),并按甜味喜欢组重新评估了感官评分变化模型:主要分析表明,干预措施对甜味强度或喜好度没有明显影响。然而,二级分析表明,甜味喜爱者在干预后对所有苏打水的喜爱度都有所下降,尤其是对浓度最高的苏打水(p = 0.0021)。而 "甜味适中者 "在干预后则提高了对汽水的好感度,原因是他们对低浓度糖的好感度提高了(p = 0.0058)。此外,甜味适中者对汽水甜味强度的总体评价也有所提高(p = 0.00074):这些结果表明,与甜味喜爱者相比,甜味适中者的干预措施可能更成功地改变了他们对甜味较低的苏打水的感官认知和接受程度。这些结果应该在更大的样本中得到验证,即有意按照甜味喜欢者的身份进行招募,以确定最初对甜味的喜欢程度是否是旨在改善对甜味较少的饮料的喜欢程度的干预措施的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信