Landscape review about the decision to euthanize a compromised pig.

IF 3 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
J Stoffregen, T Winkelmann, B Schneider, K Gerdes, M Miller, J Reinmold, C Kleinsorgen, K H Toelle, L Kreienbrock, E Grosse Beilage
{"title":"Landscape review about the decision to euthanize a compromised pig.","authors":"J Stoffregen, T Winkelmann, B Schneider, K Gerdes, M Miller, J Reinmold, C Kleinsorgen, K H Toelle, L Kreienbrock, E Grosse Beilage","doi":"10.1186/s40813-024-00378-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Timely euthanasia of a compromised pig in farming practice has been identified as a critical topic in veterinary medicine. The questions 'why and when are pigs euthanized' and 'what influences the decision making process' need to be answered to improve the situation. In the past five years, work addressing these issues has been published in the literature, however, a synthesis of the findings is missing. With the help of a quantitative and qualitative analysis, this paper has generated a landscape review to outline major topics, the role of clinical signs and further influences on the decision to euthanize a pig. Due to the quantitative content analysis, 58 topics have been identified with the role of welfare as a justification and training for caretakers in making euthanasia decisions as the most frequently mentioned. The qualitative analysis of why and when a pig is euthanized generated a set of clinical signs for organ tracts, and a set of categories influencing the decision making process. The results outline the need to increase research on details specific to understanding how clinical signs evolve over time before euthanasia. In summary, the analysis provides an overview of work in the field and ideas on how to close knowledge gaps in the future. Moreover, the article contributes to harmonize efforts in the field and underlines the need for more research about the care of compromised and injured pigs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20352,"journal":{"name":"Porcine Health Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porcine Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-024-00378-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Timely euthanasia of a compromised pig in farming practice has been identified as a critical topic in veterinary medicine. The questions 'why and when are pigs euthanized' and 'what influences the decision making process' need to be answered to improve the situation. In the past five years, work addressing these issues has been published in the literature, however, a synthesis of the findings is missing. With the help of a quantitative and qualitative analysis, this paper has generated a landscape review to outline major topics, the role of clinical signs and further influences on the decision to euthanize a pig. Due to the quantitative content analysis, 58 topics have been identified with the role of welfare as a justification and training for caretakers in making euthanasia decisions as the most frequently mentioned. The qualitative analysis of why and when a pig is euthanized generated a set of clinical signs for organ tracts, and a set of categories influencing the decision making process. The results outline the need to increase research on details specific to understanding how clinical signs evolve over time before euthanasia. In summary, the analysis provides an overview of work in the field and ideas on how to close knowledge gaps in the future. Moreover, the article contributes to harmonize efforts in the field and underlines the need for more research about the care of compromised and injured pigs.

对一头受损猪实施安乐术的决定进行景观审查。
在养殖实践中,对病死猪及时实施安乐术已被确定为兽医学的一个重要课题。需要回答 "为什么以及何时对猪实施安乐术 "和 "是什么影响了决策过程 "这两个问题,以改善现状。在过去的五年中,针对这些问题的研究成果已在文献中发表,但还缺少对研究结果的总结。在定量和定性分析的帮助下,本文对猪安乐术决策的主要议题、临床症状的作用和进一步的影响因素进行了综述。通过定量内容分析,确定了 58 个主题,其中最常被提及的是福利作为安乐术决策的理由和对看护人员进行培训的作用。通过对猪只安乐死的原因和时间进行定性分析,得出了一组器官的临床症状和一组影响决策过程的分类。分析结果概述了需要加强对具体细节的研究,以了解安乐术前临床症状是如何随时间演变的。总之,该分析概述了该领域的工作,并就未来如何缩小知识差距提出了想法。此外,文章还有助于协调该领域的工作,并强调了对受损和受伤猪只护理进行更多研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Porcine Health Management
Porcine Health Management Veterinary-Food Animals
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
49
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Porcine Health Management (PHM) is an open access peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish relevant, novel and revised information regarding all aspects of swine health medicine and production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信