The light intensity in the cultivation environment and the impact of glyphosate on plants of the Urochloa genus.

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Victor Augustus Vasconcelos de Oliveira, Luan Mateus Silva Donato, Murilo Antônio Oliveira Ruas, José Ângeles Moreira de Oliveira, Richardson Fernandes de Souza, Leonardo David Tuffi Santos
{"title":"The light intensity in the cultivation environment and the impact of glyphosate on plants of the <i>Urochloa</i> genus.","authors":"Victor Augustus Vasconcelos de Oliveira, Luan Mateus Silva Donato, Murilo Antônio Oliveira Ruas, José Ângeles Moreira de Oliveira, Richardson Fernandes de Souza, Leonardo David Tuffi Santos","doi":"10.1080/03601234.2024.2381934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The variation in light within the environment triggers morphophysiological changes in plants and can lead to distinct responses in sun-exposed or shaded plants to glyphosate. The response of <i>Urochloa</i> genotypes subjected to desiccation with 2160, 1622.4, 1080, 524.4, 273.6, and 0.0 g ha<sup>-1</sup> of glyphosate was evaluated in full sun and shade conditions. Cayana grass, mulato II grass, and sabiá grass - hybrids recently launched on the market, in addition to palisade grass and congo grass were evaluated. Under full sun, we achieved control of congo grass using 1080 g ha<sup>-1</sup> of glyphosate, while the other grasses required 2160 g ha<sup>-1</sup>. In the low-light environment, sabiá grass was effectively controlled with 524.4 g ha<sup>-1</sup> of glyphosate, but the other grasses needed 273.6 g ha<sup>-1</sup>. In shading, compared to full sun, the savings with glyphosate were 75 and 76% for the control of congo grass and sabiá grass, respectively, and 87% for palisade grass, mulato II grass and cayana grass. Increasing glyphosate doses leads to a decline in the quantum efficiency of photosystem II and in the electron transport rate, especially in the shade. <i>Urochloa</i> genotypes are more sensitive to glyphosate in the shade, which must be considered when determining the herbicide dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":15720,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B-pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes","volume":" ","pages":"540-549"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B-pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2024.2381934","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The variation in light within the environment triggers morphophysiological changes in plants and can lead to distinct responses in sun-exposed or shaded plants to glyphosate. The response of Urochloa genotypes subjected to desiccation with 2160, 1622.4, 1080, 524.4, 273.6, and 0.0 g ha-1 of glyphosate was evaluated in full sun and shade conditions. Cayana grass, mulato II grass, and sabiá grass - hybrids recently launched on the market, in addition to palisade grass and congo grass were evaluated. Under full sun, we achieved control of congo grass using 1080 g ha-1 of glyphosate, while the other grasses required 2160 g ha-1. In the low-light environment, sabiá grass was effectively controlled with 524.4 g ha-1 of glyphosate, but the other grasses needed 273.6 g ha-1. In shading, compared to full sun, the savings with glyphosate were 75 and 76% for the control of congo grass and sabiá grass, respectively, and 87% for palisade grass, mulato II grass and cayana grass. Increasing glyphosate doses leads to a decline in the quantum efficiency of photosystem II and in the electron transport rate, especially in the shade. Urochloa genotypes are more sensitive to glyphosate in the shade, which must be considered when determining the herbicide dose.

栽培环境中的光照强度和草甘膦对 Urochloa 属植物的影响。
环境中的光照变化会引发植物的形态生理变化,并导致暴露在阳光下或被遮蔽的植物对草甘膦产生不同的反应。在全日照和遮荫条件下,评估了 Urochloa 基因型对 2160、1622.4、1080、524.4、273.6 和 0.0 g ha-1 草甘膦干燥的反应。除了 Palisade 草和 congo 草之外,还对最近上市的杂交种 Cayana 草、mulato II 草和 sabiá 草进行了评估。在阳光充足的条件下,我们使用 1080 克/公顷的草甘膦对刚果草进行了控制,而其他草种则需要 2160 克/公顷的草甘膦。在弱光环境下,使用 524.4 克/公顷草甘膦可有效控制沙比利草,而其他草种则需要 273.6 克/公顷。与全日照相比,在遮光环境下,使用草甘膦控制刚果草和沙比利草的效果分别为 75% 和 76%,控制帕利色草、木兰二号草和卡亚那草的效果为 87%。草甘膦剂量的增加导致光系统 II 的量子效率和电子传输速率下降,尤其是在阴凉处。Urochloa 基因型在阴凉处对草甘膦更为敏感,在确定除草剂剂量时必须考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: 12 issues per year Abstracted/indexed in: Agricola; Analytical Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; BioSciences Information Service of Biological Abstracts (BIOSIS); CAB Abstracts; CAB AGBiotech News and Information; CAB Irrigation & Drainage Abstracts; CAB Soils & Fertilizers Abstracts; Chemical Abstracts Service Plus; CSA Aluminum Industry Abstracts; CSA ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology and Engineering; CSA ASFA 3 Aquatic Pollution and Environmental Quality; CSA ASSIA: Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts; CSA Ecology Abstracts; CSA Entomology Abstracts; CSA Environmental Engineering Abstracts; CSA Health & Safety Science Abstracts; CSA Pollution Abstracts; CSA Toxicology Abstracts; CSA Water Resource Abstracts; EBSCOhost Online Research Databases; Elsevier BIOBASE/Current Awareness in Biological Sciences; Elsevier Engineering Information: EMBASE/Excerpta Medica/ Engineering Index/COMPENDEX PLUS; Environment Abstracts; Environmental Knowledge; Food Science and Technology Abstracts; Geo Abstracts; Geobase; Food Science; Index Medicus/ MEDLINE; INIST-Pascal/ CNRS; NIOSHTIC; ISI BIOSIS Previews; Pesticides; Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes: Analytical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; PubSCIENCE; Reference Update; Research Alert; Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE); and Water Resources Abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信