Modifiable and Non-Modifiable Risk Factors for Dementia Among Non-Hispanic White and Black Populations Aged 50-64 in the United States, 2006-2016.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jingkai Wei, Matthew C Lohman, Monique J Brown, James W Hardin, Chih-Hsiang Yang, Anwar T Merchant, Daniela B Friedman
{"title":"Modifiable and Non-Modifiable Risk Factors for Dementia Among Non-Hispanic White and Black Populations Aged 50-64 in the United States, 2006-2016.","authors":"Jingkai Wei, Matthew C Lohman, Monique J Brown, James W Hardin, Chih-Hsiang Yang, Anwar T Merchant, Daniela B Friedman","doi":"10.1177/08919887241267315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Non-Hispanic Black populations (NHB) have a significantly higher prevalence of dementia than non-Hispanic Whites in the U.S., and the underlying risk factors may play a role in this racial disparity. We aimed to calculate risk scores for dementia among non-Hispanic White (NHW) and non-Hispanic Black populations aged 50-64 years over a period of 10 years, and to estimate potential differences of scores between NHW and NHB.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The Health and Retirement Study from 2006 to 2016 was used to calculate the Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Incidence of Dementia (CAIDE) risk score, a validated score for predicting dementia risk. Weighted average CAIDE score, as well as CAIDE score for modifiable factors hypertension, obese, hypercholesterolemia, physical inactivity), and non-modifiable factors (age, sex, education) were calculated for adults aged 50-64 years with normal cognition for 2006-2008, 2010-2012, 2014-2016. The associations of race with CAIDE score and elevated CAIDE score were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10,871 participants were included in the analysis. The CAIDE score showed declining trends for NHB from 2006 to 2016, while NHB consistently had a higher total CAIDE score and CAIDE score for modifiable factors from 2006 to 2016, but not for non-modifiable factors.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>NHB had a higher level of dementia risk factors than NHW among adults aged 50-64 years in the U.S. from 2006 to 2016, and the difference is attributable to modifiable risk factors, which holds promise for risk reduction of dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887241267315"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887241267315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Non-Hispanic Black populations (NHB) have a significantly higher prevalence of dementia than non-Hispanic Whites in the U.S., and the underlying risk factors may play a role in this racial disparity. We aimed to calculate risk scores for dementia among non-Hispanic White (NHW) and non-Hispanic Black populations aged 50-64 years over a period of 10 years, and to estimate potential differences of scores between NHW and NHB.

Research design and methods: The Health and Retirement Study from 2006 to 2016 was used to calculate the Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Incidence of Dementia (CAIDE) risk score, a validated score for predicting dementia risk. Weighted average CAIDE score, as well as CAIDE score for modifiable factors hypertension, obese, hypercholesterolemia, physical inactivity), and non-modifiable factors (age, sex, education) were calculated for adults aged 50-64 years with normal cognition for 2006-2008, 2010-2012, 2014-2016. The associations of race with CAIDE score and elevated CAIDE score were examined.

Results: A total of 10,871 participants were included in the analysis. The CAIDE score showed declining trends for NHB from 2006 to 2016, while NHB consistently had a higher total CAIDE score and CAIDE score for modifiable factors from 2006 to 2016, but not for non-modifiable factors.

Discussion and implications: NHB had a higher level of dementia risk factors than NHW among adults aged 50-64 years in the U.S. from 2006 to 2016, and the difference is attributable to modifiable risk factors, which holds promise for risk reduction of dementia.

2006-2016 年美国 50-64 岁非西班牙裔白人和黑人中痴呆症的可改变和不可改变风险因素。
背景和目标:在美国,非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)的痴呆症发病率明显高于非西班牙裔白人,而潜在的风险因素可能是造成这种种族差异的原因之一。我们的目的是计算 50-64 岁非西班牙裔白人(NHW)和非西班牙裔黑人在 10 年内患痴呆症的风险分数,并估计 NHW 和 NHB 之间分数的潜在差异:利用 2006 年至 2016 年的 "健康与退休研究"(Health and Retirement Study)来计算心血管风险因素、老龄化和痴呆症发病率(CAIDE)风险评分,这是预测痴呆症风险的有效评分。计算了2006-2008年、2010-2012年、2014-2016年认知正常的50-64岁成年人的加权平均CAIDE得分,以及可改变因素(高血压、肥胖、高胆固醇血症、缺乏运动)和不可改变因素(年龄、性别、教育程度)的CAIDE得分。研究还考察了种族与 CAIDE 得分和 CAIDE 得分升高之间的关系:共有 10871 名参与者参与了分析。从 2006 年到 2016 年,NHB 的 CAIDE 分数呈下降趋势,而从 2006 年到 2016 年,NHB 的 CAIDE 总分和可改变因素的 CAIDE 分数一直较高,但不可改变因素的 CAIDE 分数却不高:从2006年到2016年,在美国50-64岁的成年人中,NHB的痴呆症风险因素水平高于NHW,这种差异可归因于可改变的风险因素,这为降低痴呆症风险带来了希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (JGP) brings together original research, clinical reviews, and timely case reports on neuropsychiatric care of aging patients, including age-related biologic, neurologic, and psychiatric illnesses; psychosocial problems; forensic issues; and family care. The journal offers the latest peer-reviewed information on cognitive, mood, anxiety, addictive, and sleep disorders in older patients, as well as tested diagnostic tools and therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信