Diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Current Opinion in Neurology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1097/WCO.0000000000001302
Hannah C Timmins, Alexandra E Thompson, Matthew C Kiernan
{"title":"Diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.","authors":"Hannah C Timmins, Alexandra E Thompson, Matthew C Kiernan","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The present review will discuss the evolution of diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and biomarker considerations.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>To address the limitations of existing ALS diagnostic criteria, a consortium of key stakeholders developed the Gold Coast consensus criteria (GCC). The GCC has similar or greater sensitivity compared with the revised El Escorial (rEEC) and Awaji criteria (AC), particularly for atypical phenotypes, maintained across disease duration, severity, and site of onset. In addition to improving diagnostic sensitivity, using the GCC in clinical trials may promote an increased enrolment of up to 50% of ALS patients who do not currently meet the full diagnostic eligibility requirements of the rEEC. Future inclusion of genetic biomarkers may mitigate some limitations of the GCC, to further improve diagnostic utility. In advance of such a process, validation of these biomarkers will be required before inclusion as additional criteria.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The GCC are simpler to use than previous consensus criteria, with demonstrated greater sensitivity and, enabling an earlier and more definitive ALS diagnosis, thereby facilitating wider enrolment into clinical trials. Broader implementation of the GCC in clinical trial settings is currently underway, globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000001302","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The present review will discuss the evolution of diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and biomarker considerations.

Recent findings: To address the limitations of existing ALS diagnostic criteria, a consortium of key stakeholders developed the Gold Coast consensus criteria (GCC). The GCC has similar or greater sensitivity compared with the revised El Escorial (rEEC) and Awaji criteria (AC), particularly for atypical phenotypes, maintained across disease duration, severity, and site of onset. In addition to improving diagnostic sensitivity, using the GCC in clinical trials may promote an increased enrolment of up to 50% of ALS patients who do not currently meet the full diagnostic eligibility requirements of the rEEC. Future inclusion of genetic biomarkers may mitigate some limitations of the GCC, to further improve diagnostic utility. In advance of such a process, validation of these biomarkers will be required before inclusion as additional criteria.

Summary: The GCC are simpler to use than previous consensus criteria, with demonstrated greater sensitivity and, enabling an earlier and more definitive ALS diagnosis, thereby facilitating wider enrolment into clinical trials. Broader implementation of the GCC in clinical trial settings is currently underway, globally.

肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症的诊断标准。
综述的目的:本综述将讨论肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症(ALS)诊断标准的演变和生物标志物的考虑因素:为了解决现有 ALS 诊断标准的局限性,一个由主要利益相关者组成的联盟制定了黄金海岸共识标准(GCC)。与修订版埃斯科里亚尔标准(rEEC)和淡路标准(AC)相比,黄金海岸共识标准具有相似或更高的灵敏度,尤其是对非典型表型的灵敏度,并在病程、严重程度和发病部位方面保持不变。在临床试验中使用 GCC 除了能提高诊断灵敏度外,还能使目前不符合 rEEC 全部诊断资格要求的 ALS 患者的入选率提高 50%。未来纳入基因生物标记物可能会缓解 GCC 的某些局限性,从而进一步提高诊断效用。总结:GCC 比以前的共识标准更简单易用,灵敏度更高,能更早更明确地诊断 ALS,从而促进更多患者加入临床试验。目前,全球正在临床试验环境中更广泛地实施 GCC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Neurology
Current Opinion in Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Neurology is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews; covering key subjects such as cerebrovascular disease, developmental disorders, neuroimaging and demyelinating diseases. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Neurology introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the neurology field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信