Heterogeneity promotes resilience in restored prairie: Implications for the environmental heterogeneity hypothesis

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ashley A. Wojciechowski, John M. Blair, Scott L. Collins, Sara G. Baer
{"title":"Heterogeneity promotes resilience in restored prairie: Implications for the environmental heterogeneity hypothesis","authors":"Ashley A. Wojciechowski,&nbsp;John M. Blair,&nbsp;Scott L. Collins,&nbsp;Sara G. Baer","doi":"10.1002/eap.3006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Enhancing resilience in formerly degraded ecosystems is an important goal of restoration ecology. However, evidence for the recovery of resilience and its underlying mechanisms require long-term experiments and comparison with reference ecosystems. We used data from an experimental prairie restoration that featured long-term soil heterogeneity manipulations and data from two long-term experiments located in a comparable remnant (reference) prairie to (1) quantify the recovery of ecosystem functioning (i.e., productivity) relative to remnant prairie, (2) compare the resilience of restored and remnant prairies to a natural drought, and (3) test whether soil heterogeneity enhances resilience of restored prairie. We compared sensitivity and legacy effects between prairie types (remnant and restored) and among four prairie sites that included two remnant prairie sites and prairie restored under homogeneous and heterogeneous soil conditions. We measured sensitivity and resilience as the proportional change in aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) during and following drought (sensitivity and legacy effects, respectively) relative to average ANPP based on 4 pre-drought years (2014–2017). In nondrought years, total ANPP was similar between remnant and restored prairie, but remnant prairie had higher grass productivity and lower forb productivity compared with restored prairie. These ANPP patterns generally persisted during drought. The sensitivity of total ANPP to drought was similar between restored and remnant prairie, but grasses in the restored prairie were more sensitive to drought. Post-drought legacy effects were more positive in the restored prairie, and we attributed this to the more positive and less variable legacy response of forb ANPP in the restored prairie, especially in the heterogeneous soil treatment. Our results suggest that productivity recovers in restored prairie and exhibits similar sensitivity to drought as in remnant prairie. Furthermore, creating heterogeneity promotes forb productivity and enhances restored prairie resilience to drought.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"34 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eap.3006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.3006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enhancing resilience in formerly degraded ecosystems is an important goal of restoration ecology. However, evidence for the recovery of resilience and its underlying mechanisms require long-term experiments and comparison with reference ecosystems. We used data from an experimental prairie restoration that featured long-term soil heterogeneity manipulations and data from two long-term experiments located in a comparable remnant (reference) prairie to (1) quantify the recovery of ecosystem functioning (i.e., productivity) relative to remnant prairie, (2) compare the resilience of restored and remnant prairies to a natural drought, and (3) test whether soil heterogeneity enhances resilience of restored prairie. We compared sensitivity and legacy effects between prairie types (remnant and restored) and among four prairie sites that included two remnant prairie sites and prairie restored under homogeneous and heterogeneous soil conditions. We measured sensitivity and resilience as the proportional change in aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) during and following drought (sensitivity and legacy effects, respectively) relative to average ANPP based on 4 pre-drought years (2014–2017). In nondrought years, total ANPP was similar between remnant and restored prairie, but remnant prairie had higher grass productivity and lower forb productivity compared with restored prairie. These ANPP patterns generally persisted during drought. The sensitivity of total ANPP to drought was similar between restored and remnant prairie, but grasses in the restored prairie were more sensitive to drought. Post-drought legacy effects were more positive in the restored prairie, and we attributed this to the more positive and less variable legacy response of forb ANPP in the restored prairie, especially in the heterogeneous soil treatment. Our results suggest that productivity recovers in restored prairie and exhibits similar sensitivity to drought as in remnant prairie. Furthermore, creating heterogeneity promotes forb productivity and enhances restored prairie resilience to drought.

Abstract Image

异质性促进恢复草原的复原力:环境异质性假说的意义
提高曾经退化的生态系统的恢复能力是恢复生态学的一个重要目标。然而,恢复力及其内在机制的证据需要长期实验以及与参照生态系统的比较。我们使用了以长期土壤异质性操作为特色的草原恢复实验数据,以及在可比残存(参照)草原上进行的两项长期实验数据,以(1)量化生态系统功能(即生产力)相对于残存草原的恢复情况,(2)比较恢复草原和残存草原对自然干旱的恢复能力,以及(3)检验土壤异质性是否增强了恢复草原的恢复能力。我们比较了不同草原类型(残存草原和恢复草原)之间以及四个草原地点之间的敏感性和遗产效应,其中包括两个残存草原地点以及在同质和异质土壤条件下恢复的草原。我们以干旱期间和干旱后地上净初级生产力(ANPP)相对于干旱前 4 年(2014-2017 年)平均 ANPP 的比例变化(分别为敏感性和遗留效应)来衡量敏感性和恢复力。在非干旱年份,残存草原和恢复草原的总净初级生产力相似,但与恢复草原相比,残存草原的禾本科生产力较高,而被子植物生产力较低。这些 ANPP 模式在干旱期间普遍持续存在。恢复草原和残存草原的总ANPP对干旱的敏感性相似,但恢复草原的禾本科植物对干旱更为敏感。干旱后的遗留效应在恢复后的草原上更为积极,我们认为这是由于恢复后的草原,尤其是在异质土壤处理中,禁止 ANPP 的遗留反应更为积极且变化较小。我们的研究结果表明,恢复后的大草原生产力会恢复,并表现出与残存草原类似的对干旱的敏感性。此外,创造异质性能促进禁草的生产力,增强恢复后的草原对干旱的适应能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信