Efficacy and safety of atogepant, a small molecule CGRP receptor antagonist, for the preventive treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Min Hou, Xiaofeng Luo, Shuangshuang He, Xue Yang, Qing Zhang, Meihua Jin, Pan Zhang, Yang Li, Xiaoting Bi, Juan Li, Caiyi Cheng, Qiang Xue, Haiyan Xing, Yao Liu
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of atogepant, a small molecule CGRP receptor antagonist, for the preventive treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Min Hou, Xiaofeng Luo, Shuangshuang He, Xue Yang, Qing Zhang, Meihua Jin, Pan Zhang, Yang Li, Xiaoting Bi, Juan Li, Caiyi Cheng, Qiang Xue, Haiyan Xing, Yao Liu","doi":"10.1186/s10194-024-01822-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Migraine is one of the most common diseases worldwide while current treatment options are not ideal. New therapeutic classes of migraine, the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists, have been developed and shown considerable effectiveness and safety. The present study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of atogepant, a CGRP antagonist, for migraine prophylaxis from the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed and https://www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov/ were searched for RCTs that compared atogepant with placebo for migraine prophylaxis from inception of the databases to Feb 1, 2024. Outcome data involving efficacy and safety were combined and analyzed using Review Manager Software version 5.3 (RevMan 5.3). For each outcome, risk ratios (RRs) or standardized mean difference (SMD) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4 RCTs with a total of 2813 subjects met our inclusion criteria. The overall effect estimate showed that atogepant was significantly superior to placebo in terms of the reduction of monthly migraine (SMD - 0.40, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.34) or headache (SMD - 0.39, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.33) days, the reduction of acute medication use days (SMD - 0.45, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.39) and 50% responder rate (RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.46 to 1.89), while no dose-related improvements were found between different dosage groups. For the safety, significant number of patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with atogepant than with placebo (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.21) while there was no obvious difference between the five dosage groups. Most TEAEs involved constipation (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.91-3.41), nausea (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.67-2.87) and urinary tract infection (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05-2.11). In addition, a high dosage of atogepant may also increase the risk of treatment-related TEAEs (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.02-2.63) and fatigue (RR 3.07, 95% CI 1.13-8.35).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that atogepant is effective and tolerable for migraine prophylaxis including episodic or chronic migraine compared with placebo. It is critical to weigh the benefits of different doses against the risk of adverse events in clinical application of atogepant. Longer and multi-dose trials with larger sample sizes are required to verify the current findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01822-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Migraine is one of the most common diseases worldwide while current treatment options are not ideal. New therapeutic classes of migraine, the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists, have been developed and shown considerable effectiveness and safety. The present study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of atogepant, a CGRP antagonist, for migraine prophylaxis from the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: The Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed and https://www.

Clinicaltrials: gov/ were searched for RCTs that compared atogepant with placebo for migraine prophylaxis from inception of the databases to Feb 1, 2024. Outcome data involving efficacy and safety were combined and analyzed using Review Manager Software version 5.3 (RevMan 5.3). For each outcome, risk ratios (RRs) or standardized mean difference (SMD) were calculated.

Results: 4 RCTs with a total of 2813 subjects met our inclusion criteria. The overall effect estimate showed that atogepant was significantly superior to placebo in terms of the reduction of monthly migraine (SMD - 0.40, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.34) or headache (SMD - 0.39, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.33) days, the reduction of acute medication use days (SMD - 0.45, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.39) and 50% responder rate (RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.46 to 1.89), while no dose-related improvements were found between different dosage groups. For the safety, significant number of patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with atogepant than with placebo (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.21) while there was no obvious difference between the five dosage groups. Most TEAEs involved constipation (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.91-3.41), nausea (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.67-2.87) and urinary tract infection (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05-2.11). In addition, a high dosage of atogepant may also increase the risk of treatment-related TEAEs (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.02-2.63) and fatigue (RR 3.07, 95% CI 1.13-8.35).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that atogepant is effective and tolerable for migraine prophylaxis including episodic or chronic migraine compared with placebo. It is critical to weigh the benefits of different doses against the risk of adverse events in clinical application of atogepant. Longer and multi-dose trials with larger sample sizes are required to verify the current findings.

小分子 CGRP 受体拮抗剂阿托格潘预防性治疗偏头痛的有效性和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:偏头痛是全球最常见的疾病之一,但目前的治疗方案并不理想。降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)拮抗剂是治疗偏头痛的新疗法,已被开发出来并显示出相当的有效性和安全性。本研究旨在从随机对照试验(RCTs)的结果中系统评估阿托格潘(一种CGRP拮抗剂)用于偏头痛预防的有效性和安全性:方法:在 Cochrane Library、Embase、PubMed 和 https://www.Clinicaltrials: gov/ 等数据库中搜索了从数据库建立之初到 2024 年 2 月 1 日期间将阿托格潘与安慰剂比较用于偏头痛预防的 RCT。涉及疗效和安全性的结果数据均采用综述管理软件 5.3 版(RevMan 5.3)进行合并和分析。对每种结果计算风险比(RR)或标准化平均差(SMD):结果:4 项 RCT 共 2813 名受试者符合我们的纳入标准。总效应估计值显示,阿托格潘在减少每月偏头痛(SMD - 0.40,95% CI -0.46至-0.34)或头痛(SMD - 0.39,95% CI -0.46至-0.33)天数、减少急性用药天数(SMD - 0.45,95% CI -0.51至-0.39)和50%应答率(RR 1.66,95% CI 1.46至1.89)方面明显优于安慰剂,而不同剂量组之间未发现与剂量相关的改善。在安全性方面,与安慰剂相比,服用阿托格潘出现治疗突发不良事件(TEAEs)的患者人数较多(RR 1.10,95% CI 1.02-1.21),而五个剂量组之间没有明显差异。大多数 TEAEs 涉及便秘(RR 2.55,95% CI 1.91-3.41)、恶心(RR 2.19,95% CI 1.67-2.87)和尿路感染(RR 1.49,95% CI 1.05-2.11)。此外,大剂量服用阿托格潘还可能增加治疗相关TEAEs(RR 1.64,95% CI 1.02-2.63)和疲劳(RR 3.07,95% CI 1.13-8.35)的风险:这项荟萃分析表明,与安慰剂相比,阿托吉潘对偏头痛(包括发作性或慢性偏头痛)的预防有效且可耐受。在阿托格潘的临床应用中,权衡不同剂量的益处与不良反应风险至关重要。要验证目前的研究结果,还需要进行更长时间、更大样本量的多剂量试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Headache and Pain
Journal of Headache and Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
13.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Headache and Pain, a peer-reviewed open-access journal published under the BMC brand, a part of Springer Nature, is dedicated to researchers engaged in all facets of headache and related pain syndromes. It encompasses epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials, and real-world data. With a multidisciplinary approach, The Journal of Headache and Pain addresses headache medicine and related pain syndromes across all medical disciplines. It particularly encourages submissions in clinical, translational, and basic science fields, focusing on pain management, genetics, neurology, and internal medicine. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, letters to the Editor, as well as consensus articles and guidelines, aimed at promoting best practices in managing patients with headaches and related pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信