Attitudes, perceptions, and experiences of Western Australians towards vaccine safety surveillance systems following COVID-19 vaccines: A qualitative descriptive study
IF 2.6 3区 医学Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Denis Liu Shiu Cheong , Jayden Tran , Wyitt Chong , Scott May , Samantha J. Carlson , Sandra M. Salter , Katie Attwell
{"title":"Attitudes, perceptions, and experiences of Western Australians towards vaccine safety surveillance systems following COVID-19 vaccines: A qualitative descriptive study","authors":"Denis Liu Shiu Cheong , Jayden Tran , Wyitt Chong , Scott May , Samantha J. Carlson , Sandra M. Salter , Katie Attwell","doi":"10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Concerns regarding adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) are a barrier to vaccine uptake. Health professionals use vaccine safety surveillance systems (VSSS) to monitor vaccines and inform the public of safety data. With little known about public attitudes, perceptions, and experiences with VSSS, we examined them in the context of COVID-19 vaccinations in Western Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Researchers conducted 158 qualitative interviews between March 2021 to May 2022 within the broader Coronavax project. Data regarding VSSS was coded in NVivo using deductive and inductive methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Despite some not knowing about VSSS, participants expected follow-up post COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccine hesitant or refusing participants knew about VSSS and regarded these systems positively. Additional considerations concerned the reliability of data collected by VSSS.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Perceptions of VSSS signal a lack of understanding about how these systems work. Future studies should further explore the public’s understanding of VSSS, whether VSSS improves vaccine confidence, and how governments can better communicate to the public about VSSS.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for public health</h3><p>Lack of understanding of how VSSS operate may be stymying attempts to build public vaccine confidence. Healthcare providers and governments could build public knowledge and understanding of VSSS to mitigate concerns of AEFIs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8620,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","volume":"48 4","pages":"Article 100177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000530/pdfft?md5=6b778ae1dd1fe8b1531186cc6b85db43&pid=1-s2.0-S1326020024000530-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000530","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Concerns regarding adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) are a barrier to vaccine uptake. Health professionals use vaccine safety surveillance systems (VSSS) to monitor vaccines and inform the public of safety data. With little known about public attitudes, perceptions, and experiences with VSSS, we examined them in the context of COVID-19 vaccinations in Western Australia.
Methods
Researchers conducted 158 qualitative interviews between March 2021 to May 2022 within the broader Coronavax project. Data regarding VSSS was coded in NVivo using deductive and inductive methods.
Results
Despite some not knowing about VSSS, participants expected follow-up post COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccine hesitant or refusing participants knew about VSSS and regarded these systems positively. Additional considerations concerned the reliability of data collected by VSSS.
Conclusion
Perceptions of VSSS signal a lack of understanding about how these systems work. Future studies should further explore the public’s understanding of VSSS, whether VSSS improves vaccine confidence, and how governments can better communicate to the public about VSSS.
Implications for public health
Lack of understanding of how VSSS operate may be stymying attempts to build public vaccine confidence. Healthcare providers and governments could build public knowledge and understanding of VSSS to mitigate concerns of AEFIs.
期刊介绍:
The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (ANZJPH) is concerned with public health issues. The research reported includes formal epidemiological inquiries into the correlates and causes of diseases and health-related behaviour, analyses of public policy affecting health and disease, and detailed studies of the cultures and social structures within which health and illness exist. The Journal is multidisciplinary and aims to publish methodologically sound research from any of the academic disciplines that constitute public health.