Obstetric anal sphincter injuries during instrumental vaginal delivery: An observational study based on 18-years of real-world data

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Kathrine Fodstad, Katariina Laine, Sari Räisänen
{"title":"Obstetric anal sphincter injuries during instrumental vaginal delivery: An observational study based on 18-years of real-world data","authors":"Kathrine Fodstad,&nbsp;Katariina Laine,&nbsp;Sari Räisänen","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.17914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To determine the prevalence and secular trends of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in vacuum and forceps deliveries in Norway, both with and without episiotomy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Population-based real-world data collected during 2001–2018.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Medical Birth Registry Norway.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population or Sample</h3>\n \n <p>Nulliparous women with singleton foetuses in a cephalic presentation delivered by either vacuum or forceps (<i>n</i> = 70 783).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Logistic regression analyses were applied to the OASIS prevalence in six 3-year time periods. Both crude odds ratios and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>OASIS prevalence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The OASIS prevalence in vacuum and forceps deliveries decreased from 14.8% during 2001–2003 to 5.2% during 2016–2018. The overall reduction between the first and last 3-year time period was 61% (aOR = 0.39, 95% CIs = 0.35–0.43). The only exception to this decreasing trend in OASIS was found in forceps deliveries performed without an episiotomy. The OASIS prevalence was approximately twofold higher in forceps compared to vacuum deliveries (aOR = 1.92, 95% CIs = 1.79–2.05). Performing either a mediolateral or lateral episiotomy was associated with a 45% decrease in the prevalence of OASIS relative to no episiotomy (aOR = 0.55, 95% CIs = 0.52–0.58).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Opting for vacuum rather than forceps delivery in conjunction with a mediolateral or lateral episiotomy could significantly lower the OASIS prevalence in nulliparous women.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"131 13","pages":"1824-1831"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.17914","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17914","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To determine the prevalence and secular trends of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in vacuum and forceps deliveries in Norway, both with and without episiotomy.

Design

Population-based real-world data collected during 2001–2018.

Setting

Medical Birth Registry Norway.

Population or Sample

Nulliparous women with singleton foetuses in a cephalic presentation delivered by either vacuum or forceps (n = 70 783).

Methods

Logistic regression analyses were applied to the OASIS prevalence in six 3-year time periods. Both crude odds ratios and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined.

Main Outcome Measures

OASIS prevalence.

Results

The OASIS prevalence in vacuum and forceps deliveries decreased from 14.8% during 2001–2003 to 5.2% during 2016–2018. The overall reduction between the first and last 3-year time period was 61% (aOR = 0.39, 95% CIs = 0.35–0.43). The only exception to this decreasing trend in OASIS was found in forceps deliveries performed without an episiotomy. The OASIS prevalence was approximately twofold higher in forceps compared to vacuum deliveries (aOR = 1.92, 95% CIs = 1.79–2.05). Performing either a mediolateral or lateral episiotomy was associated with a 45% decrease in the prevalence of OASIS relative to no episiotomy (aOR = 0.55, 95% CIs = 0.52–0.58).

Conclusions

Opting for vacuum rather than forceps delivery in conjunction with a mediolateral or lateral episiotomy could significantly lower the OASIS prevalence in nulliparous women.

Abstract Image

器械阴道分娩过程中的产科肛门括约肌损伤:基于 18 年真实世界数据的观察研究
目的确定挪威真空和产钳分娩中产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)的患病率和长期趋势,包括外阴切开术和非外阴切开术.设计2001-2018年期间收集的基于人口的真实世界数据.设置挪威医疗出生登记处.人口或样本头位分娩的单胎无阴道产妇,采用真空或产钳分娩(n = 70 783).方法对6个3年时间段的OASIS患病率进行逻辑回归分析。主要结果测量OASIS患病率。结果真空和产钳分娩的OASIS患病率从2001-2003年的14.8%降至2016-2018年的5.2%。第一个三年期和最后一个三年期之间的总体降幅为 61%(aOR = 0.39,95% CIs = 0.35-0.43)。在 OASIS 下降趋势中,唯一的例外是没有进行外阴切开术的产钳助产。与真空助产相比,产钳助产的OASIS发生率大约高出两倍(aOR = 1.92,95% CIs = 1.79-2.05)。与不进行外阴切开术相比,进行内外侧或外侧外阴切开术可使 OASIS 发生率降低 45%(aOR = 0.55,95% CIs = 0.52-0.58)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信