Battle of the Blocks: Which Pain Management Technique Triumphs in Gender-Affirming Bilateral Mastectomies?

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of clinical medicine research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.14740/jocmr5159
Sengottaian Sivakumar, Aron Kressel, Roni Mendonca, Michael Girshin
{"title":"Battle of the Blocks: Which Pain Management Technique Triumphs in Gender-Affirming Bilateral Mastectomies?","authors":"Sengottaian Sivakumar, Aron Kressel, Roni Mendonca, Michael Girshin","doi":"10.14740/jocmr5159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gender-affirming mastectomy, performed on transgender men and non-binary individuals, frequently leads to considerable postoperative pain. This pain can significantly affect both patient satisfaction and the overall recovery process. The study examines the efficacy of four analgesic techniques pectoral nerve (PECS) 2 block, erector spinae plane (ESP) block, thoracic wall local anesthesia infiltration (TWI), and systemic multimodal analgesia (SMA) in managing perioperative pain, with special consideration for the effects of chronic testosterone therapy on pain thresholds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients aged 18 - 45 who underwent gender-affirming bilateral mastectomies at a New York City community hospital. The study compared intraoperative and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores, the interval to first rescue analgesia, and total PACU duration among the four analgesic techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found significant differences in intraoperative and PACU opioid consumption across the groups, with the PECS 2 block group showing the least opioid requirement. The PACU morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption was highest in the SMA group. Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the PECS and ESP groups at earlier time points post-surgery. However, by postoperative day 2, pain scores did not significantly differ among the groups. Chronic testosterone therapy did not significantly impact intraoperative opioid requirements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PECS 2 block is superior in reducing overall opioid consumption and providing effective postoperative pain control in gender-affirming mastectomies. The study underscores the importance of tailoring pain management strategies to the unique physiological responses of the transgender and non-binary community. Future research should focus on prospective designs, standardized block techniques, and the complex relationship between hormonal therapy and pain perception.</p>","PeriodicalId":94329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical medicine research","volume":"16 6","pages":"284-292"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254309/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical medicine research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr5159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gender-affirming mastectomy, performed on transgender men and non-binary individuals, frequently leads to considerable postoperative pain. This pain can significantly affect both patient satisfaction and the overall recovery process. The study examines the efficacy of four analgesic techniques pectoral nerve (PECS) 2 block, erector spinae plane (ESP) block, thoracic wall local anesthesia infiltration (TWI), and systemic multimodal analgesia (SMA) in managing perioperative pain, with special consideration for the effects of chronic testosterone therapy on pain thresholds.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients aged 18 - 45 who underwent gender-affirming bilateral mastectomies at a New York City community hospital. The study compared intraoperative and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores, the interval to first rescue analgesia, and total PACU duration among the four analgesic techniques.

Results: The study found significant differences in intraoperative and PACU opioid consumption across the groups, with the PECS 2 block group showing the least opioid requirement. The PACU morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption was highest in the SMA group. Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the PECS and ESP groups at earlier time points post-surgery. However, by postoperative day 2, pain scores did not significantly differ among the groups. Chronic testosterone therapy did not significantly impact intraoperative opioid requirements.

Conclusion: The PECS 2 block is superior in reducing overall opioid consumption and providing effective postoperative pain control in gender-affirming mastectomies. The study underscores the importance of tailoring pain management strategies to the unique physiological responses of the transgender and non-binary community. Future research should focus on prospective designs, standardized block techniques, and the complex relationship between hormonal therapy and pain perception.

阻滞之战:哪种疼痛管理技术能在性别确认的双侧乳房切除术中取得胜利?
背景:为变性男性和非二进制人士实施的性别确认乳房切除术经常会导致相当大的术后疼痛。这种疼痛会严重影响患者的满意度和整个恢复过程。本研究探讨了四种镇痛技术胸神经(PECS)2阻滞、竖脊平面(ESP)阻滞、胸壁局部麻醉浸润(TWI)和全身多模式镇痛(SMA)在控制围手术期疼痛方面的疗效,并特别考虑了慢性睾酮治疗对疼痛阈值的影响:对纽约市一家社区医院接受性别确认双侧乳腺切除术的 18-45 岁患者进行了回顾性分析。该研究比较了四种镇痛技术在术中和麻醉后护理病房(PACU)的阿片类药物消耗量、术后疼痛评分、首次抢救性镇痛间隔时间以及 PACU 总持续时间:研究发现,各组在术中和 PACU 阿片类药物消耗量上存在显著差异,其中 PECS 2 阻滞组的阿片类药物需求量最少。SMA 组的 PACU 吗啡毫克当量(MME)消耗量最高。在术后较早时间点,PECS 组和 ESP 组的术后疼痛评分明显较低。然而,在术后第 2 天,各组的疼痛评分没有明显差异。慢性睾酮治疗对术中阿片类药物的需求没有明显影响:结论:PECS 2阻滞在减少阿片类药物的总体用量和有效控制性别确认乳房切除术的术后疼痛方面更具优势。这项研究强调了根据变性和非二元群体的独特生理反应调整疼痛管理策略的重要性。未来的研究应侧重于前瞻性设计、标准化阻滞技术以及激素治疗与疼痛感知之间的复杂关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信