La rigueur scientifique de l’approche expertale

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, LEGAL

Medecine & Droit Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.meddro.2024.06.001

Ridouan Hammouch Professeur Maître de Conférence - Docteur en Droit Privé , Yamna Fatmi Professeure universitaire - P.E.S.

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Experts are crucial in legal disputes that involve technical matters beyond a judge's competence. Procedural requirements and the judge's assessment of an expert's conclusions provide control guarantees to ensure the reliability of scientific expertise. Experts are obligated to follow objective and rigorous investigation processes, with a professional duty to accuracy and logical approaches. This article examines how judges can control the scientific rigor of experts’ approaches.

查看原文本刊更多论文

专家方法的科学严谨性

在涉及超出法官权限的技术问题的法律纠纷中，专家至关重要。程序要求和法官对专家结论的评估为确保科学专业知识的可靠性提供了控制保障。专家有义务遵循客观、严谨的调查程序，对准确性和逻辑方法负有专业责任。本文探讨了法官如何控制专家方法的科学严谨性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Medecine & Droit MEDICINE, LEGAL-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues