Women’s Experiences of Mechanical Balloon Catheter Induction With Self-Traction

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Isabelle Landry, Roseline Galipeau, Amélie Gervaise, Valérie Bohémier, Diane Croteau, Valérie Lebel
{"title":"Women’s Experiences of Mechanical Balloon Catheter Induction With Self-Traction","authors":"Isabelle Landry,&nbsp;Roseline Galipeau,&nbsp;Amélie Gervaise,&nbsp;Valérie Bohémier,&nbsp;Diane Croteau,&nbsp;Valérie Lebel","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore women’s experiences of mechanical labor induction using a balloon catheter with self-traction.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Descriptive qualitative.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Birth unit of an urban hospital in Quebec, Canada.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Fourteen women who experienced labor induction with a balloon catheter using self-traction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted individual structured interviews between May 2022 and January 2023 to collect data that we subsequently analyzed using the manifest content analysis approach of Graneheim et al. We adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified five categories: <em>Expectations</em>, <em>Pain or Comfort Experienced</em>, <em>Emotions Felt</em>, <em>Support From Nursing Staff</em>, and <em>Appreciation of the Procedure.</em> The participants anticipated rapid, effective induction, expressed concerns about potential discomfort, and appreciated control of their experiences. We found a generally positive trend in terms of appreciation for all categories.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The positive experiences of participants underline the promising potential of the balloon catheter method of labor induction with self-traction. Given the continuing growth in labor induction rates, it becomes necessary to continue efforts to offer services specifically geared to women’s needs. Offering an additional option such as self-traction is a step in this direction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":"53 5","pages":"Pages 562-571"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0884217524002284/pdfft?md5=e06eee45e4cca8a47a3cc4be39176627&pid=1-s2.0-S0884217524002284-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0884217524002284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To explore women’s experiences of mechanical labor induction using a balloon catheter with self-traction.

Design

Descriptive qualitative.

Setting

Birth unit of an urban hospital in Quebec, Canada.

Participants

Fourteen women who experienced labor induction with a balloon catheter using self-traction.

Methods

We conducted individual structured interviews between May 2022 and January 2023 to collect data that we subsequently analyzed using the manifest content analysis approach of Graneheim et al. We adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).

Results

We identified five categories: Expectations, Pain or Comfort Experienced, Emotions Felt, Support From Nursing Staff, and Appreciation of the Procedure. The participants anticipated rapid, effective induction, expressed concerns about potential discomfort, and appreciated control of their experiences. We found a generally positive trend in terms of appreciation for all categories.

Conclusion

The positive experiences of participants underline the promising potential of the balloon catheter method of labor induction with self-traction. Given the continuing growth in labor induction rates, it becomes necessary to continue efforts to offer services specifically geared to women’s needs. Offering an additional option such as self-traction is a step in this direction.

妇女在使用机械球囊导管引产时的自我牵引体验
目标探讨妇女在使用球囊导管自我牵引机械引产过程中的经历。方法我们在 2022 年 5 月至 2023 年 1 月期间进行了个人结构式访谈,以收集数据,随后采用 Graneheim 等人的显式内容分析法对数据进行了分析。结果我们确定了五个类别:我们确定了五个类别:期望、经历的疼痛或舒适感、感受到的情绪、护理人员的支持以及对手术的赞赏。参与者期待快速、有效的诱导,对可能出现的不适表示担忧,并对控制自己的体验表示赞赏。我们发现,在所有类别中,对引产过程的赞赏普遍呈积极趋势。鉴于引产率的持续增长,有必要继续努力提供专门针对女性需求的服务。提供额外的选择,如自我牵引,就是朝着这个方向迈出的一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns. This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信