Flap Versus Flapless Implant Placement in Immediate Functional Loading: A Comparative Study

IF 0.8 Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics

Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_395_24

Piyush Javiya, T. Anjan, S. Duseja, Jeevan Matada Basavarajaiah, Jignesh Tate, Rahul Puthenkandathil, F. Baig

{"title":"Flap Versus Flapless Implant Placement in Immediate Functional Loading: A Comparative Study","authors":"Piyush Javiya, T. Anjan, S. Duseja, Jeevan Matada Basavarajaiah, Jignesh Tate, Rahul Puthenkandathil, F. Baig","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_395_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n Dental implants are now the typical tooth replacement method. Because it speeds up therapy, quick functional loading—attaching prosthetic restorations to implants following surgery—has become popular. Flapless implant implantation reduces surgical stress and expedites recovery.\n \n \n \n A prospective comparative study of 100 flap and flapless dental implant patients was done. Patient-reported outcomes, implant survival, peri-implant parameters, and surgical complications were assessed. Statistical analysis compared the two groups’ results.\n \n \n \n Both flap and flapless methods exhibited good implant survival and similar peri-implant characteristics. Patients reported equal postoperative comfort and satisfaction in both groups. Surgical complications were similar for flap and flapless surgeries.\n \n \n \n In immediate functional loading, flap and flapless implant insertion are equally effective and safe. Both methods yield dependable implant survival, peri-implant health, patient comfort, and surgical safety. Dental professionals should evaluate patient variables and anatomical aspects while choosing an implant implantation surgery. Implant dentistry needs further study on long-term results and treatment regimens.\n","PeriodicalId":16824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_395_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Dental implants are now the typical tooth replacement method. Because it speeds up therapy, quick functional loading—attaching prosthetic restorations to implants following surgery—has become popular. Flapless implant implantation reduces surgical stress and expedites recovery. A prospective comparative study of 100 flap and flapless dental implant patients was done. Patient-reported outcomes, implant survival, peri-implant parameters, and surgical complications were assessed. Statistical analysis compared the two groups’ results. Both flap and flapless methods exhibited good implant survival and similar peri-implant characteristics. Patients reported equal postoperative comfort and satisfaction in both groups. Surgical complications were similar for flap and flapless surgeries. In immediate functional loading, flap and flapless implant insertion are equally effective and safe. Both methods yield dependable implant survival, peri-implant health, patient comfort, and surgical safety. Dental professionals should evaluate patient variables and anatomical aspects while choosing an implant implantation surgery. Implant dentistry needs further study on long-term results and treatment regimens.

查看原文本刊更多论文

即刻功能负荷中的翻瓣与无瓣种植体植入：比较研究

摘要牙种植体是目前典型的牙齿替换方法。由于可以加快治疗速度，快速功能加载--在手术后将修复体安装到种植体上--已变得非常流行。无瓣种植可减少手术压力并加快恢复。我们对 100 名翻瓣和无瓣种植牙患者进行了前瞻性比较研究。对患者报告的结果、种植体存活率、种植体周围参数和手术并发症进行了评估。统计分析比较了两组结果。翻瓣法和无瓣法都显示出良好的种植体存活率和相似的种植体周围特征。两组患者的术后舒适度和满意度相当。翻瓣和无瓣手术的并发症相似。在即刻功能负荷中，翻瓣和无瓣种植体植入同样有效和安全。两种方法都能保证种植体的存活率、种植体周围的健康、患者的舒适度和手术的安全性。牙科专业人员在选择种植体植入手术时，应评估患者的变量和解剖学方面的因素。种植牙的长期效果和治疗方案还需要进一步研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

275

审稿时长

34 weeks

期刊介绍： Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is a Quarterly multidisciplinary open access biomedical journal. Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is an international medium of interaction between scientist, academicians and industrial personnel’s.JPBS is now offial publication of OPUBS.