Short-term effects of modified ultrasonography in laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Xun Wang , Xuan Meng , Liming Wang, Peng Wang, Zhihao Wang, Weiqi Rong, Zhiyu Lu, Hongguang Wang
{"title":"Short-term effects of modified ultrasonography in laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma","authors":"Xun Wang ,&nbsp;Xuan Meng ,&nbsp;Liming Wang,&nbsp;Peng Wang,&nbsp;Zhihao Wang,&nbsp;Weiqi Rong,&nbsp;Zhiyu Lu,&nbsp;Hongguang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.iliver.2024.100106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><p>Laparoscopic hepatectomy is challenging, and ultrasound guidance is an effective aid but lacks standardization. This study aimed to evaluate a modified approach for laparoscopic ultrasonography to enhance surgical outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Between January 2020 and August 2023, 122 patients who underwent real-time ultrasound-guided laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled and divided into modified and traditional ultrasonography groups. The modified ultrasound application comprised intraoperative protocol-based laparoscopic ultrasonography comprising application scenarios; standardized positions for the surgeon, trocar, and probe; and the resulting standardized sections for various laparoscopic liver resections. Clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Subgroup analysis was performed and comprised techniques for modified duct structure identification and portal vein branch puncture; both techniques were used in fluorescence probe-mounted laparoscopic liver resection using negative and positive staining procedures, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The traditional and modified groups comprised 64 and 58 patients, respectively. The patients’ background characteristics were not significantly different between the groups. Surgical duration (283.4 min vs. 225.1 min; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), Pringle maneuver duration (47.4 min vs. 39.5 min; <em>p</em> = 0.014), bleeding volume (258.6 mL vs. 174.8 mL; <em>p</em> = 0.005), overall complication rate (31.3% vs. 15.5%; <em>p</em> = 0.041), and postoperative stay were significantly greater in the traditional vs. modified ultrasonography groups, respectively. The modified method positively affected the number of punctures, success rate of staining, intraoperative bleeding volume, and operation duration.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Modified ultrasonography improves the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic hepatectomy. Ultrasonography is pivotal, especially in fluorescence probe-assisted laparoscopic liver resection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100657,"journal":{"name":"iLIVER","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772947824000318/pdfft?md5=be0303c5aa9e5b1f82a1533c9b8ebe58&pid=1-s2.0-S2772947824000318-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iLIVER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772947824000318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Laparoscopic hepatectomy is challenging, and ultrasound guidance is an effective aid but lacks standardization. This study aimed to evaluate a modified approach for laparoscopic ultrasonography to enhance surgical outcomes.

Methods

Between January 2020 and August 2023, 122 patients who underwent real-time ultrasound-guided laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled and divided into modified and traditional ultrasonography groups. The modified ultrasound application comprised intraoperative protocol-based laparoscopic ultrasonography comprising application scenarios; standardized positions for the surgeon, trocar, and probe; and the resulting standardized sections for various laparoscopic liver resections. Clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Subgroup analysis was performed and comprised techniques for modified duct structure identification and portal vein branch puncture; both techniques were used in fluorescence probe-mounted laparoscopic liver resection using negative and positive staining procedures, respectively.

Results

The traditional and modified groups comprised 64 and 58 patients, respectively. The patients’ background characteristics were not significantly different between the groups. Surgical duration (283.4 min vs. 225.1 min; p < 0.001), Pringle maneuver duration (47.4 min vs. 39.5 min; p = 0.014), bleeding volume (258.6 mL vs. 174.8 mL; p = 0.005), overall complication rate (31.3% vs. 15.5%; p = 0.041), and postoperative stay were significantly greater in the traditional vs. modified ultrasonography groups, respectively. The modified method positively affected the number of punctures, success rate of staining, intraoperative bleeding volume, and operation duration.

Conclusions

Modified ultrasonography improves the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic hepatectomy. Ultrasonography is pivotal, especially in fluorescence probe-assisted laparoscopic liver resection.

腹腔镜肝癌解剖切除术中改良超声波检查的短期效果
背景和目的腹腔镜肝切除术具有挑战性,超声引导是一种有效的辅助手段,但缺乏标准化。方法在 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 8 月期间,纳入了 122 例因肝细胞癌接受实时超声引导腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术的患者,并将其分为改良超声组和传统超声组。改良超声应用包括术中基于规程的腹腔镜超声应用场景;外科医生、套管针和探头的标准化位置;以及由此产生的各种腹腔镜肝切除术的标准化切片。两组患者的临床特征和围手术期结果进行了比较。结果 传统组和改良组分别有 64 名和 58 名患者。两组患者的背景特征无明显差异。传统组和改良组的手术时间(283.4 分钟 vs. 225.1 分钟;p < 0.001)、Pringle 操作时间(47.4 分钟 vs. 39.5 分钟;p = 0.014)、出血量(258.6 毫升 vs. 174.8 毫升;p = 0.005)、总体并发症发生率(31.3% vs. 15.5%;p = 0.041)和术后住院时间分别明显高于改良组。改良方法对穿刺次数、染色成功率、术中出血量和手术时间有积极影响。超声波检查至关重要,尤其是在荧光探针辅助腹腔镜肝切除术中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信