Reliability and validity of a newly developed PANDAS/PANS questionnaire

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
{"title":"Reliability and validity of a newly developed PANDAS/PANS questionnaire","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpn.2024.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of a newly developed questionnaire for Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal infections (PANDAS) and Pediatric Acute-onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome (PANS). The aim was to contribute to future standardisation of screening methods for symptoms and comorbidity, as well as the measurement of symptom severity, daily life impairment, and treatment effectiveness in individuals diagnosed with PANDAS/PANS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>27 items from the PANDAS/PANS questionnaire concerning symptoms and comorbidities associated with PANDAS/PANS were divided into ten domains. To assess the external validity, 119 PANDAS/PANS questionnaires from a cohort of 65 children with PANDAS/PANS were correlated with three well-known validated questionnaires: the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS), and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). The internal validity of the PANDAS/PANS questionnaire was assessed by correlating the PANDAS/PANS items with the domains.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Internal consistency of the PANDAS/PANS questionnaire was high, measuring moderate to very strong correlations. The external correlations for the PANDAS/PANS questionnaire showed a higher correlation with the ADHD-RS and CY-BOCS (r<sub>s</sub> ≥ 0.60) than with the SDQ (r<sub>s</sub> &lt; 0.40).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The validity and clinical feasibility of the PANDAS/PANS questionnaire were confirmed as an effective tool for screening symptoms, assessing symptom severity, and evaluating comorbidity and daily life impairment in individuals with PANDAS/PANS. These findings can potentially enhance the management of PANDAS/PANS patients in both clinical and research settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50481,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Paediatric Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090379824001053/pdfft?md5=1e7feec63bcd4ab9f5c073c04014267e&pid=1-s2.0-S1090379824001053-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Paediatric Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090379824001053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of a newly developed questionnaire for Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal infections (PANDAS) and Pediatric Acute-onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome (PANS). The aim was to contribute to future standardisation of screening methods for symptoms and comorbidity, as well as the measurement of symptom severity, daily life impairment, and treatment effectiveness in individuals diagnosed with PANDAS/PANS.

Methods

27 items from the PANDAS/PANS questionnaire concerning symptoms and comorbidities associated with PANDAS/PANS were divided into ten domains. To assess the external validity, 119 PANDAS/PANS questionnaires from a cohort of 65 children with PANDAS/PANS were correlated with three well-known validated questionnaires: the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS), and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). The internal validity of the PANDAS/PANS questionnaire was assessed by correlating the PANDAS/PANS items with the domains.

Results

Internal consistency of the PANDAS/PANS questionnaire was high, measuring moderate to very strong correlations. The external correlations for the PANDAS/PANS questionnaire showed a higher correlation with the ADHD-RS and CY-BOCS (rs ≥ 0.60) than with the SDQ (rs < 0.40).

Conclusion

The validity and clinical feasibility of the PANDAS/PANS questionnaire were confirmed as an effective tool for screening symptoms, assessing symptom severity, and evaluating comorbidity and daily life impairment in individuals with PANDAS/PANS. These findings can potentially enhance the management of PANDAS/PANS patients in both clinical and research settings.

新开发的 PANDAS/PANS 问卷的可靠性和有效性
本研究旨在检验新开发的链球菌感染相关小儿自身免疫性神经精神障碍(PANDAS)和小儿急性发作神经精神综合征(PANS)问卷的可靠性和有效性。目的是促进今后症状和合并症筛查方法的标准化,以及对被诊断为 PANDAS/PANS 患者的症状严重程度、日常生活障碍和治疗效果的测量。方法将 PANDAS/PANS 问卷中有关 PANDAS/PANS 相关症状和合并症的 27 个项目分为 10 个领域。为了评估外部效度,我们将 65 名 PANDAS/PANS 患儿的 119 份 PANDAS/PANS 问卷与三份著名的有效问卷进行了比对,这三份问卷是:儿童耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(CY-BOCS)、注意力缺陷多动障碍评定量表(ADHD-RS)和优势与困难问卷(SDQ)。通过将 PANDAS/PANS 项目与各领域相关联,评估了 PANDAS/PANS 问卷的内部效度。结果PANDAS/PANS 问卷的内部一致性很高,测量出中等至非常强的相关性。PANDAS/PANS 问卷的外部相关性显示,与 ADHD-RS 和 CY-BOCS 的相关性(rs ≥ 0.60)高于与 SDQ 的相关性(rs < 0.40)。结论PANDAS/PANS 问卷的有效性和临床可行性得到证实,是筛查 PANDAS/PANS 患者症状、评估症状严重程度、评估合并症和日常生活障碍的有效工具。这些研究结果有可能加强临床和研究机构对 PANDAS/PANS 患者的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
115
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Paediatric Neurology is the Official Journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society, successor to the long-established European Federation of Child Neurology Societies. Under the guidance of a prestigious International editorial board, this multi-disciplinary journal publishes exciting clinical and experimental research in this rapidly expanding field. High quality papers written by leading experts encompass all the major diseases including epilepsy, movement disorders, neuromuscular disorders, neurodegenerative disorders and intellectual disability. Other exciting highlights include articles on brain imaging and neonatal neurology, and the publication of regularly updated tables relating to the main groups of disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信