Effect of Simulated Intrapulpal Pressure on Microtensile Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Composite to Dentin

Y. El-Bouhi
{"title":"Effect of Simulated Intrapulpal Pressure on Microtensile Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Composite to Dentin","authors":"Y. El-Bouhi","doi":"10.21608/edj.2024.282398.3004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aim: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a self-adhesive flowable resin composite (Vertise Flow) under simulated intrapulpal pressure IPP) and compare it to a conventional adhesive and flowable composite combination. Materials and Methods: Thirty human molars were used. IPP of 15 cm H 2 O was applied. Group I (control): Adeper Easy One + Z 250 (composite), Group II: Etching + Adeper Easy One + Z 250, Group III: Adeper Easy One + flowable composite + Z 250, Group IV: Etching + Adeper Easy One + flowable composite + Z 250, Group V: Vertise Flow + Z 250, and Group VI: Etching + Vertise Flow + Z 250. Data analysis employed one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test for inter-group comparisons (at P < 0.05). Results: Etching the dentin prior to bonding with Adeper Easy One significantly increased µTBS to 25.12 MPa (S.D.: 5.78 MPa). Application of flowable composite resulted in a µTBS of 13.62 MPa (S.D. = 5.50 MPa), not statistically different. Group IV exhibited the highest mean µTBS (31.26 MPa, S.D. = 6.04 MPa). Group V showed the lowest mean µTBS (8.89 MPa, S.D. = 0.97 MPa). Etching before application of Vertise Flow in Group VI showed significant increased µTBS to 13.83 MPa (S.D. = 1.33 MPa) Conclusion: Dentin conditioning before application of Vetise Flow is necessary to produce a µTBS comparable to that of conventional approach of self-etch adhesive.","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.282398.3004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aim: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a self-adhesive flowable resin composite (Vertise Flow) under simulated intrapulpal pressure IPP) and compare it to a conventional adhesive and flowable composite combination. Materials and Methods: Thirty human molars were used. IPP of 15 cm H 2 O was applied. Group I (control): Adeper Easy One + Z 250 (composite), Group II: Etching + Adeper Easy One + Z 250, Group III: Adeper Easy One + flowable composite + Z 250, Group IV: Etching + Adeper Easy One + flowable composite + Z 250, Group V: Vertise Flow + Z 250, and Group VI: Etching + Vertise Flow + Z 250. Data analysis employed one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test for inter-group comparisons (at P < 0.05). Results: Etching the dentin prior to bonding with Adeper Easy One significantly increased µTBS to 25.12 MPa (S.D.: 5.78 MPa). Application of flowable composite resulted in a µTBS of 13.62 MPa (S.D. = 5.50 MPa), not statistically different. Group IV exhibited the highest mean µTBS (31.26 MPa, S.D. = 6.04 MPa). Group V showed the lowest mean µTBS (8.89 MPa, S.D. = 0.97 MPa). Etching before application of Vertise Flow in Group VI showed significant increased µTBS to 13.83 MPa (S.D. = 1.33 MPa) Conclusion: Dentin conditioning before application of Vetise Flow is necessary to produce a µTBS comparable to that of conventional approach of self-etch adhesive.
模拟髓内压对自粘树脂复合材料与牙本质微拉伸粘接强度的影响
背景/目的:这项体外研究旨在评估自粘性可流动树脂复合材料(Vertise Flow)在模拟龈内压 IPP 下的微张力粘结强度(µTBS),并将其与传统粘合剂和可流动复合材料组合进行比较。材料和方法:使用 30 颗人类臼齿。施加 15 cm H 2 O 的 IPP。第一组(对照组):第二组:蚀刻 + Adeper Easy One + Z 250;第三组:Adeper Easy One + 可流动复合材料 + Z 250;第四组:蚀刻 + Adeper Easy One + 可流动复合材料 + Z 250;第五组:Vertise Flow + Z 250;第六组:蚀刻 + Vertise Flow + Z 250。数据分析采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 后检验进行组间比较(P < 0.05)。结果在使用 Adeper Easy One 进行粘接之前对牙本质进行蚀刻,可将 µTBS 显著提高至 25.12 兆帕(标准偏差:5.78 兆帕)。使用可流动复合材料后,µTBS 为 13.62 兆帕(标准差 = 5.50 兆帕),无统计学差异。第四组的平均 µTBS 值最高(31.26 兆帕,S.D. = 6.04 兆帕)。第五组的平均 µTBS 值最低(8.89 兆帕,标准差 = 0.97 兆帕)。第六组在使用 Vertise Flow 前进行的蚀刻显示 µTBS 显著增加到 13.83 兆帕(S.D. = 1.33 兆帕):在使用 Vetise Flow 之前有必要对牙本质进行调节,以获得与传统自酸蚀粘合剂方法相当的 µTBS 值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信