Assessment of rehabilitation nurses' knowledge and results of nurse educational programme (C2F) regarding osteoporosis and fragility fractures

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING
Georgina Pimentel , Arménio Cruz , Cristina Lavareda Baixinho , Maria Loureiro , Sílvia Fernandes , Ricardo J.O. Ferreira , Andréa Marques
{"title":"Assessment of rehabilitation nurses' knowledge and results of nurse educational programme (C2F) regarding osteoporosis and fragility fractures","authors":"Georgina Pimentel ,&nbsp;Arménio Cruz ,&nbsp;Cristina Lavareda Baixinho ,&nbsp;Maria Loureiro ,&nbsp;Sílvia Fernandes ,&nbsp;Ricardo J.O. Ferreira ,&nbsp;Andréa Marques","doi":"10.1016/j.ijotn.2024.101120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Providing adequate care for the person with a fragility fracture is essential to prevent recurrences. A key strategy involves training by improving nursing care in the fields of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. However, in Portugal, there is no report on the level of knowledge of nurses, nor experimental studies on how to improve it.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The study aimed to assess the knowledge of Rehabilitation Nurses in Portugal on osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Additionally, it sought to evaluate the impact of a specific educational programme on nurses' knowledge.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In Phase I, a cross-sectional study involved 452 participants, utilizing a 26-question knowledge test. In Phase II, a quasi-experimental study included 42 nurses from 28 hospitals, subjected to a 30-h hybrid educational programme. The program comprised 9 online (2 h 30 min each) and 2 live sessions, covering assessment, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, monitoring, project planning, consultations, and outcome indicators measurement. A before-and-after programme knowledge test was administered.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Phase I revealed an average knowledge score of 69.6%. In Phase II, there was a significant improvement with programme (70.4% vs. 85.8%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). Specialized nurses performed better than non-specialized nurses (80% <em>vs.</em> 75%, <em>p</em> = 0.011), and those from orthopaedic services showed the greatest improvement (92% <em>vs.</em> 83%, <em>p</em> = 0.014).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Rehabilitation Nurses in Portugal have room to improve their knowledge of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. The hybrid educational programme proved effective in improving nurses' knowledge, especially among specialist and orthopaedic service nurses. We hope that this knowledge can be translated into continuous improvement in healthcare provision.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124124000406/pdfft?md5=8809e69b3c020086c4d06b59b99037a6&pid=1-s2.0-S1878124124000406-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124124000406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Providing adequate care for the person with a fragility fracture is essential to prevent recurrences. A key strategy involves training by improving nursing care in the fields of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. However, in Portugal, there is no report on the level of knowledge of nurses, nor experimental studies on how to improve it.

Objective

The study aimed to assess the knowledge of Rehabilitation Nurses in Portugal on osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Additionally, it sought to evaluate the impact of a specific educational programme on nurses' knowledge.

Methods

In Phase I, a cross-sectional study involved 452 participants, utilizing a 26-question knowledge test. In Phase II, a quasi-experimental study included 42 nurses from 28 hospitals, subjected to a 30-h hybrid educational programme. The program comprised 9 online (2 h 30 min each) and 2 live sessions, covering assessment, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, monitoring, project planning, consultations, and outcome indicators measurement. A before-and-after programme knowledge test was administered.

Results

Phase I revealed an average knowledge score of 69.6%. In Phase II, there was a significant improvement with programme (70.4% vs. 85.8%, p < 0.01). Specialized nurses performed better than non-specialized nurses (80% vs. 75%, p = 0.011), and those from orthopaedic services showed the greatest improvement (92% vs. 83%, p = 0.014).

Conclusions

Rehabilitation Nurses in Portugal have room to improve their knowledge of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. The hybrid educational programme proved effective in improving nurses' knowledge, especially among specialist and orthopaedic service nurses. We hope that this knowledge can be translated into continuous improvement in healthcare provision.

评估康复护士对骨质疏松症和脆性骨折的认识以及护士教育计划(C2F)的成果
背景为脆性骨折患者提供充分的护理对预防复发至关重要。一项重要的策略是通过改善骨质疏松症和脆性骨折领域的护理来进行培训。本研究旨在评估葡萄牙康复护士对骨质疏松症和脆性骨折的了解程度。此外,该研究还试图评估特定教育计划对护士知识的影响。方法在第一阶段,一项横断面研究涉及 452 名参与者,采用了 26 个问题的知识测试。第二阶段是一项准实验研究,共有来自 28 家医院的 42 名护士参加了为期 30 小时的混合教育课程。课程包括 9 节在线课程(每节 2 小时 30 分钟)和 2 节现场课程,内容包括评估、药物和非药物治疗、监测、项目规划、咨询和结果指标测量。第一阶段的平均知识得分率为 69.6%。在第二阶段,计划实施后的得分有了显著提高(70.4% 对 85.8%,p < 0.01)。专科护士的表现优于非专科护士(80% 对 75%,p = 0.011),骨科护士的进步最大(92% 对 83%,p = 0.014)。事实证明,混合教育计划能有效提高护士的知识水平,尤其是专科护士和骨科护士。我们希望这些知识能够转化为医疗服务的持续改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信