Assessment of Ochratoxin (OTA) residues in meat and their biochemical effects in commercial farmed and backyard chicken

Biochemistry Lab Haidy E. Mohamed
{"title":"Assessment of Ochratoxin (OTA) residues in meat and their biochemical effects in commercial farmed and backyard chicken","authors":"Biochemistry Lab Haidy E. Mohamed","doi":"10.21608/ejah.2024.353391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I n Egypt, the practice of raising chicken in farms as well as backyard is widespread. Ochratoxin A (OTA) is one of the most common mycotox-ins in chicken feed and their meat, which poses a concern for both animal and human health. The study aimed to investigate OTA residues by us-ing ELISA technique in meat, liver and kidney samples. Additionally, it aimed to evaluate total protein, albumin, globulin, functions and antioxidant state of both liver and kidney, in addition to assess some meat quality parameters of both farm-raised and backyard chicken. A total of 60 chicken (30 each of farm-raised and backyard chickens) were collected across different regions of Ismailia City, Egypt. The results revealed that incidence of OTA residues was significantly higher in all farm-raised chicken samples than in all backyard chicken samples, with significant higher concentration in kidney samples, followed by liver samples then breast and thigh meat samples. According to the Egyptian and International Standards, neither breast and thigh meat nor liver samples exceeded the permissible limits in both breeding systems. Moreover, farm raised chicken revealed noteworthy decline (P<0.05) in serum total proteins and albumin. Conversely, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), creatinine and urea exhibited significant increases. A significant reduction in total antioxidant capacity (TAC), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) within kidney and liver. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between backyard and farmed raised chicken meat in pH values, moisture%, protein% and ash %. However, significantly higher fat % and thiobarbeturic acid reactive substances (TBARS) content in farm raised chicken meat than backyard ones. In conclusion, OTA residues were higher in farm-raised chicken, inversely affecting their biochemical and oxidative capacity with no differences in meat quality except their higher fat content and higher meat oxidation. Regular monitoring for OTA residues in chickens and their feed with effective management and control strategies are essential for all breeding systems","PeriodicalId":11415,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Animal Health","volume":"17 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Animal Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejah.2024.353391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I n Egypt, the practice of raising chicken in farms as well as backyard is widespread. Ochratoxin A (OTA) is one of the most common mycotox-ins in chicken feed and their meat, which poses a concern for both animal and human health. The study aimed to investigate OTA residues by us-ing ELISA technique in meat, liver and kidney samples. Additionally, it aimed to evaluate total protein, albumin, globulin, functions and antioxidant state of both liver and kidney, in addition to assess some meat quality parameters of both farm-raised and backyard chicken. A total of 60 chicken (30 each of farm-raised and backyard chickens) were collected across different regions of Ismailia City, Egypt. The results revealed that incidence of OTA residues was significantly higher in all farm-raised chicken samples than in all backyard chicken samples, with significant higher concentration in kidney samples, followed by liver samples then breast and thigh meat samples. According to the Egyptian and International Standards, neither breast and thigh meat nor liver samples exceeded the permissible limits in both breeding systems. Moreover, farm raised chicken revealed noteworthy decline (P<0.05) in serum total proteins and albumin. Conversely, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), creatinine and urea exhibited significant increases. A significant reduction in total antioxidant capacity (TAC), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) within kidney and liver. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between backyard and farmed raised chicken meat in pH values, moisture%, protein% and ash %. However, significantly higher fat % and thiobarbeturic acid reactive substances (TBARS) content in farm raised chicken meat than backyard ones. In conclusion, OTA residues were higher in farm-raised chicken, inversely affecting their biochemical and oxidative capacity with no differences in meat quality except their higher fat content and higher meat oxidation. Regular monitoring for OTA residues in chickens and their feed with effective management and control strategies are essential for all breeding systems
评估商品鸡和散养鸡肉类中的赭曲霉毒素(OTA)残留量及其生化影响
在埃及,农场和后院养鸡的做法十分普遍。赭曲霉毒素 A(OTA)是鸡饲料和鸡肉中最常见的霉菌毒素之一,对动物和人类健康都造成了威胁。这项研究旨在利用酶联免疫吸附技术,调查肉类、肝脏和肾脏样本中的赭曲霉毒素 A 残留量。此外,研究还旨在评估农场饲养鸡和散养鸡的总蛋白、白蛋白、球蛋白、肝脏和肾脏的功能和抗氧化状态,以及一些肉质参数。研究人员在埃及伊斯梅利亚市的不同地区共收集了 60 只鸡(农场饲养鸡和散养鸡各 30 只)。结果显示,所有农场饲养的鸡肉样本中 OTA 残留的发生率明显高于所有散养鸡样本,其中肾脏样本中的浓度明显较高,其次是肝脏样本,然后是胸肉和大腿肉样本。根据埃及标准和国际标准,这两种饲养系统中的胸肉和大腿肉样本以及肝脏样本均未超过允许限值。此外,农场饲养鸡的血清总蛋白和白蛋白显著下降(P<0.05)。相反,血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、肌酐和尿素则显著增加。肾脏和肝脏的总抗氧化能力(TAC)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GPx)明显下降。此外,散养鸡肉和养殖鸡肉在 pH 值、水分百分比、蛋白质百分比和灰分百分比方面没有明显差异。不过,农场饲养鸡肉的脂肪率和硫代巴比妥酸活性物质(TBARS)含量明显高于散养鸡肉。总之,农场饲养的鸡肉中 OTA 残留量较高,会对其生化和氧化能力产生负面影响,但除了脂肪含量较高和肉的氧化程度较高外,肉质并无差异。定期监测鸡及其饲料中的 OTA 残留,并采取有效的管理和控制策略,对所有养殖系统都至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信