Effectiveness of Smartphone Applications vs Conventional Care in Warfarin Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Time in the Therapeutic Range

Q3 Medicine
Wanchai Wongkornrat, A. Siriussawakul, P. Suraarunsumrit, Tasapol Charoenrat, Tipchutha Satidwongpibool
{"title":"Effectiveness of Smartphone Applications vs Conventional Care in Warfarin Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Time in the Therapeutic Range","authors":"Wanchai Wongkornrat, A. Siriussawakul, P. Suraarunsumrit, Tasapol Charoenrat, Tipchutha Satidwongpibool","doi":"10.33192/smj.v76i7.268122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Warfarin is extensively used as an oral anticoagulant; however, its clinical application is complicated by a narrow therapeutic index. This investigation evaluated the efficacy of a drug reminder application versus traditional care in facilitating patients’ maintenance of the therapeutic range, as well as in stabilizing the time in the therapeutic range (TTR).\nMaterial and Methods: A single-blind randomized controlled trial recruited 40 warfarin users (≥3 months) with stable INR for 6 months. The intervention group received a smartphone app reminder. All INR values were collected for 6 months. Primary outcomes were TTR, INR, TTR during drug-drug interactions, and warfarin complications.\nResults: Forty patients were recruited between January 2021 and August 2023. The mean TTR was 66.11%±9.8% for the intervention group and 67.31%±18.08% for the control group. With analysis of covariance, the results were slightly better in the intervention group, but the differences were not statistically significant (95%CI = -5.67 – 1.92, P-value = 0.323). For the 6-month INR monitoring, 6 out of 8 patients who could maintain the therapeutic INR range were in the intervention group. There were no statistically significant differences in warfarin-related complications between the two groups (20% vs 15%, RR 1.333, 95%CI = 0.3413 – 5.2086, P-value = 0.6790).\nConclusion: The drug reminder application likely improved the TTR, although without statistical significance. Further studies are needed to identify technology assistance in improving treatment outcomes.","PeriodicalId":37270,"journal":{"name":"Siriraj Medical Journal","volume":"26 60","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siriraj Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v76i7.268122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Warfarin is extensively used as an oral anticoagulant; however, its clinical application is complicated by a narrow therapeutic index. This investigation evaluated the efficacy of a drug reminder application versus traditional care in facilitating patients’ maintenance of the therapeutic range, as well as in stabilizing the time in the therapeutic range (TTR). Material and Methods: A single-blind randomized controlled trial recruited 40 warfarin users (≥3 months) with stable INR for 6 months. The intervention group received a smartphone app reminder. All INR values were collected for 6 months. Primary outcomes were TTR, INR, TTR during drug-drug interactions, and warfarin complications. Results: Forty patients were recruited between January 2021 and August 2023. The mean TTR was 66.11%±9.8% for the intervention group and 67.31%±18.08% for the control group. With analysis of covariance, the results were slightly better in the intervention group, but the differences were not statistically significant (95%CI = -5.67 – 1.92, P-value = 0.323). For the 6-month INR monitoring, 6 out of 8 patients who could maintain the therapeutic INR range were in the intervention group. There were no statistically significant differences in warfarin-related complications between the two groups (20% vs 15%, RR 1.333, 95%CI = 0.3413 – 5.2086, P-value = 0.6790). Conclusion: The drug reminder application likely improved the TTR, although without statistical significance. Further studies are needed to identify technology assistance in improving treatment outcomes.
智能手机应用与传统护理在华法林治疗中的效果对比:关于治疗范围内时间的随机对照试验
目的:华法林是一种广泛使用的口服抗凝剂,但由于其治疗指数较窄,临床应用较为复杂。这项调查评估了药物提醒应用与传统护理在促进患者维持治疗范围以及稳定治疗范围内时间(TTR)方面的效果:一项单盲随机对照试验招募了 40 名使用华法林(≥3 个月)6 个月且 INR 稳定的患者。干预组接受智能手机应用提醒。所有 INR 值均收集 6 个月。主要结果为TTR、INR、药物相互作用期间的TTR以及华法林并发症:2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 8 月间招募了 40 名患者。干预组的平均 TTR 为 66.11%±9.8%,对照组为 67.31%±18.08%。通过协方差分析,干预组的结果略好,但差异无统计学意义(95%CI = -5.67 - 1.92,P 值 = 0.323)。在为期 6 个月的 INR 监测中,干预组的 8 名患者中有 6 人能够维持在治疗 INR 范围内。两组患者在华法林相关并发症方面无统计学差异(20% vs 15%,RR 1.333,95%CI = 0.3413 - 5.2086,P 值 = 0.6790):尽管没有统计学意义,但药物提醒应用可能改善了 TTR。需要进一步研究,以确定技术对改善治疗效果的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Siriraj Medical Journal
Siriraj Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信