An in vitro comparative evaluation of efficiency of three rotary nickel–titanium file systems in terms of remaining dentin thickness using cone-beam computed tomography

Alreem Subedar, Shishir Singh, R. Podar, Abhishek Laha, Avinash Salgar, Roshan U. Shetty, Teena Sitlaney
{"title":"An in vitro comparative evaluation of efficiency of three rotary nickel–titanium file systems in terms of remaining dentin thickness using cone-beam computed tomography","authors":"Alreem Subedar, Shishir Singh, R. Podar, Abhishek Laha, Avinash Salgar, Roshan U. Shetty, Teena Sitlaney","doi":"10.4103/jcd.jcd_310_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The objective of the present research was to assess and compare the residual dentin thickness after biomechanical preparation of teeth using three distinct rotary nickel–titanium (Ni-Ti) file systems.\n \n \n \n In the current experimental study, a total of 45 single-rooted teeth were selected for the analysis. The cementoenamel junction of each tooth was decoronated using a diamond disc. The teeth were randomly allocated to three groups, with each group representing a different rotary file system: Group 1: Hero GOLD (Micro Mega), Group 2: One Curve (Micro Mega), and Group 3: HyFlex electro-discharge machining (EDM) (Coltene-Whaledent, Altstatten, Switzerland). To evaluate the initial condition of the teeth, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were conducted before the biomechanical preparation. The teeth were positioned on a modeling wax sheet, and the CBCT scans provided baseline measurements. The biomechanical preparation of the root canals followed the manufacturer’s recommended guidelines for each file system. After the completion of the canal preparation, follow-up CBCT scans were conducted. The postprocedure CBCT scans were then compared with the initial scans to assess any changes in the residual thickness of dentin in the teeth.\n \n \n \n \n Post hoc Tukey analysis of variance tests was utilized to examine differences between the groups. A statistically significant result was defined as P = 0.05 or less for every test.\n \n \n \n The comparison of preinstrumentation and postinstrumentation CBCT images showed that the HyFlex EDM group removed less dentin clinically compared to the other two groups, i.e., Hero GOLD and One Curve. No significant statistical difference was found between Hero GOLD versus One Curve, One Curve versus HyFlex EDM, and Hero GOLD versus HyFlex EDM.\n \n \n \n Based on the results of this study, the HyFlex EDM file system exhibited superior cutting efficiency at various levels. Nonetheless, additional investigations are required to comprehensively assess the influence of Ni-Ti rotary file systems on the remaining dentin thickness.\n","PeriodicalId":516572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_310_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of the present research was to assess and compare the residual dentin thickness after biomechanical preparation of teeth using three distinct rotary nickel–titanium (Ni-Ti) file systems. In the current experimental study, a total of 45 single-rooted teeth were selected for the analysis. The cementoenamel junction of each tooth was decoronated using a diamond disc. The teeth were randomly allocated to three groups, with each group representing a different rotary file system: Group 1: Hero GOLD (Micro Mega), Group 2: One Curve (Micro Mega), and Group 3: HyFlex electro-discharge machining (EDM) (Coltene-Whaledent, Altstatten, Switzerland). To evaluate the initial condition of the teeth, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were conducted before the biomechanical preparation. The teeth were positioned on a modeling wax sheet, and the CBCT scans provided baseline measurements. The biomechanical preparation of the root canals followed the manufacturer’s recommended guidelines for each file system. After the completion of the canal preparation, follow-up CBCT scans were conducted. The postprocedure CBCT scans were then compared with the initial scans to assess any changes in the residual thickness of dentin in the teeth. Post hoc Tukey analysis of variance tests was utilized to examine differences between the groups. A statistically significant result was defined as P = 0.05 or less for every test. The comparison of preinstrumentation and postinstrumentation CBCT images showed that the HyFlex EDM group removed less dentin clinically compared to the other two groups, i.e., Hero GOLD and One Curve. No significant statistical difference was found between Hero GOLD versus One Curve, One Curve versus HyFlex EDM, and Hero GOLD versus HyFlex EDM. Based on the results of this study, the HyFlex EDM file system exhibited superior cutting efficiency at various levels. Nonetheless, additional investigations are required to comprehensively assess the influence of Ni-Ti rotary file systems on the remaining dentin thickness.
使用锥束计算机断层扫描对三种旋转式镍钛锉系统在剩余牙本质厚度方面的效率进行体外比较评估
本研究的目的是评估和比较使用三种不同的旋转式镍钛(Ni-Ti)锉系统对牙齿进行生物力学预备后的残余牙本质厚度。 在本次实验研究中,共选取了 45 颗单根牙齿进行分析。每颗牙齿的牙釉质交界处都用金刚石盘进行了装饰。这些牙齿被随机分配到三组,每组代表不同的旋转锉系统:第一组:Hero GOLD (Micro Mega);第二组:One Curve (Micro Mega);第三组:Micro Mega (Micro Mega)第 1 组:Hero GOLD(Micro Mega);第 2 组:One Curve(Micro Mega);第 3 组:HyFlex 放电加工(EDM)(Coltene-Whaledent,Altstatten,瑞士)。为了评估牙齿的初始状态,在生物力学制备前进行了锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)。牙齿被放置在模型蜡板上,CBCT 扫描提供了基线测量值。根管的生物力学预备遵循每个锉系统的制造商推荐指南。根管预备完成后,进行了后续的 CBCT 扫描。然后将制备后的 CBCT 扫描结果与初始扫描结果进行比较,以评估牙本质残余厚度的任何变化。 采用事后 Tukey 方差分析检验来检查各组之间的差异。每次测试的 P = 0.05 或更小,即为具有统计学意义的结果。 器械前和器械后 CBCT 图像的比较显示,与其他两组(即 Hero GOLD 和 One Curve)相比,HyFlex EDM 组临床上去除的牙本质较少。Hero GOLD 与 One Curve、One Curve 与 HyFlex EDM 以及 Hero GOLD 与 HyFlex EDM 之间没有发现明显的统计学差异。 根据这项研究的结果,HyFlex EDM 文件系统在不同水平上都表现出更高的切割效率。不过,要全面评估镍钛旋转锉系统对剩余牙本质厚度的影响,还需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信