Evaluating the image recognition capabilities of GPT-4V and Gemini Pro in the Japanese national dental examination

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hikaru Fukuda , Masaki Morishita , Kosuke Muraoka , Shino Yamaguchi , Taiji Nakamura , Izumi Yoshioka , Shuji Awano , Kentaro Ono
{"title":"Evaluating the image recognition capabilities of GPT-4V and Gemini Pro in the Japanese national dental examination","authors":"Hikaru Fukuda ,&nbsp;Masaki Morishita ,&nbsp;Kosuke Muraoka ,&nbsp;Shino Yamaguchi ,&nbsp;Taiji Nakamura ,&nbsp;Izumi Yoshioka ,&nbsp;Shuji Awano ,&nbsp;Kentaro Ono","doi":"10.1016/j.jds.2024.06.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/purpose</h3><div>OpenAI's GPT-4V and Google's Gemini Pro, being Large Language Models (LLMs) equipped with image recognition capabilities, have the potential to be utilized in future medical diagnosis and treatment, ands serve as valuable educational support tools for students. This study compared and evaluated the image recognition capabilities of GPT-4V and Gemini Pro using questions from the Japanese National Dental Examination (JNDE) to investigate their potential as educational support tools.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We analyzed 160 questions from the 116th JNDE, administered in March 2023, using ChatGPT-4V, and Gemini Pro, which have image recognition functions. Standardized prompts were used for all LLMs, and statistical analysis was conducted using Fisher's exact test and the Mann–Whitney U test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For the 160 JNDE questions, the accuracy rates of GPT-4V and Gemini Pro were 35.0% and 28.1%, respectively, with GPT-4V being the highest, although not statistically significant. Across dental specialties, the accuracy rates of the GPT-4V were generally higher than those of the Gemini Pro, with some areas showing equal accuracy. Accuracy rates tended to decrease with an increased number of images within a question, suggesting that the number of images influenced the correctness of the responses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The overall superior performance of GPT-4V compared to Gemini Pro may be attributed to the continuous updates in OpenAI's model. This research demonstrates the potential of LLMs as educational support tools in dentistry, while also highlighting areas that require further technological development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"20 1","pages":"Pages 368-372"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790224002125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/purpose

OpenAI's GPT-4V and Google's Gemini Pro, being Large Language Models (LLMs) equipped with image recognition capabilities, have the potential to be utilized in future medical diagnosis and treatment, ands serve as valuable educational support tools for students. This study compared and evaluated the image recognition capabilities of GPT-4V and Gemini Pro using questions from the Japanese National Dental Examination (JNDE) to investigate their potential as educational support tools.

Materials and methods

We analyzed 160 questions from the 116th JNDE, administered in March 2023, using ChatGPT-4V, and Gemini Pro, which have image recognition functions. Standardized prompts were used for all LLMs, and statistical analysis was conducted using Fisher's exact test and the Mann–Whitney U test.

Results

For the 160 JNDE questions, the accuracy rates of GPT-4V and Gemini Pro were 35.0% and 28.1%, respectively, with GPT-4V being the highest, although not statistically significant. Across dental specialties, the accuracy rates of the GPT-4V were generally higher than those of the Gemini Pro, with some areas showing equal accuracy. Accuracy rates tended to decrease with an increased number of images within a question, suggesting that the number of images influenced the correctness of the responses.

Conclusion

The overall superior performance of GPT-4V compared to Gemini Pro may be attributed to the continuous updates in OpenAI's model. This research demonstrates the potential of LLMs as educational support tools in dentistry, while also highlighting areas that require further technological development.
评估 GPT-4V 和 Gemini Pro 在日本全国牙科考试中的图像识别能力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dental Sciences
Journal of Dental Sciences 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
6 days
期刊介绍: he Journal of Dental Sciences (JDS), published quarterly, is the official and open access publication of the Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China (ADS-ROC). The precedent journal of the JDS is the Chinese Dental Journal (CDJ) which had already been covered by MEDLINE in 1988. As the CDJ continued to prove its importance in the region, the ADS-ROC decided to move to the international community by publishing an English journal. Hence, the birth of the JDS in 2006. The JDS is indexed in the SCI Expanded since 2008. It is also indexed in Scopus, and EMCare, ScienceDirect, SIIC Data Bases. The topics covered by the JDS include all fields of basic and clinical dentistry. Some manuscripts focusing on the study of certain endemic diseases such as dental caries and periodontal diseases in particular regions of any country as well as oral pre-cancers, oral cancers, and oral submucous fibrosis related to betel nut chewing habit are also considered for publication. Besides, the JDS also publishes articles about the efficacy of a new treatment modality on oral verrucous hyperplasia or early oral squamous cell carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信