Comparison of the rate and indications of caesarean section in primigravida and multigravida in a maternity hospital of Pakistan.q

Laiyla Shinwari, Basirat Bukhari, Sarwat Irfan, R. Faisal
{"title":"Comparison of the rate and indications of caesarean section in primigravida and multigravida in a maternity hospital of Pakistan.q","authors":"Laiyla Shinwari, Basirat Bukhari, Sarwat Irfan, R. Faisal","doi":"10.29309/tpmj/2024.31.07.7653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the causes and rate of caesarean section in primigravida and multigravida. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Government Maternity Hospital, Peshawar. Period: January 2021 to January 2022. Methods: The study included all primigravida with 37-42 weeks period of gestation, and multigravida (gravida 2-12) with the same gestational period. Similarly, all the multigravida who delivered previously by C-section or had normal vaginal delivery with the viable fetus and currently delivered by C-section, were also included. Cases having history of ruptured uterus, nonviable pregnancy and ectopic pregnancy were excluded from the study. Results: Overall, the frequency of C-sections in the present study was 30% in primigravida and 70% in multigravida. Majority of the patients (65%) went through elective C-sections while 35% delivered through emergency C-sections, difference between the two is statistically significant (p-value <0.0001). The commonest cause for performing elective C-sections was previous C-sections. Fetal distress was the commonest indication 27.27% for emergency C-sections. Most of the C-sections performed in primigravida were because of fetal distress 23.3% while previous C-sections were the topmost cause in multigravida. Maternal wish is another new indication that accounted for 7.6% of C-sections. Conclusion: The results showed that the incidence of C-sections was higher in multigravida than primigravida. Similarly, the rate of elective C-sections was more than emergency ones. Maternal wish is another rising new indication for C-sections.","PeriodicalId":22991,"journal":{"name":"The professional medical journal","volume":"173 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The professional medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2024.31.07.7653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To compare the causes and rate of caesarean section in primigravida and multigravida. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Government Maternity Hospital, Peshawar. Period: January 2021 to January 2022. Methods: The study included all primigravida with 37-42 weeks period of gestation, and multigravida (gravida 2-12) with the same gestational period. Similarly, all the multigravida who delivered previously by C-section or had normal vaginal delivery with the viable fetus and currently delivered by C-section, were also included. Cases having history of ruptured uterus, nonviable pregnancy and ectopic pregnancy were excluded from the study. Results: Overall, the frequency of C-sections in the present study was 30% in primigravida and 70% in multigravida. Majority of the patients (65%) went through elective C-sections while 35% delivered through emergency C-sections, difference between the two is statistically significant (p-value <0.0001). The commonest cause for performing elective C-sections was previous C-sections. Fetal distress was the commonest indication 27.27% for emergency C-sections. Most of the C-sections performed in primigravida were because of fetal distress 23.3% while previous C-sections were the topmost cause in multigravida. Maternal wish is another new indication that accounted for 7.6% of C-sections. Conclusion: The results showed that the incidence of C-sections was higher in multigravida than primigravida. Similarly, the rate of elective C-sections was more than emergency ones. Maternal wish is another rising new indication for C-sections.
巴基斯坦一家妇产医院初产妇和多产妇剖腹产率和适应症的比较。
目的:比较初产妇和多产妇剖腹产的原因和比例:比较初产妇和多产妇剖腹产的原因和比例。研究设计:横断面研究。研究地点白沙瓦政府妇产医院。时间:2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月。研究方法研究对象包括所有妊娠期为 37-42 周的初产妇和妊娠期相同的多产妇(妊娠期为 2-12 周)。同样,所有曾剖腹产的多胎妊娠妇女,或曾在阴道正常分娩且胎儿存活但现在剖腹产的多胎妊娠妇女也包括在内。有子宫破裂、胎停育和宫外孕病史的病例不在研究范围内。研究结果总体而言,本研究中初产妇的剖腹产率为 30%,多产妇为 70%。大多数患者(65%)进行了选择性剖腹产,而 35% 的患者进行了紧急剖腹产,两者之间的差异具有统计学意义(P 值小于 0.0001)。进行选择性剖腹产的最常见原因是曾有过剖腹产经历。胎儿窘迫是紧急剖腹产的最常见原因,占 27.27%。23.3% 的初产妇剖腹产是因为胎儿窘迫,而既往剖腹产则是多产妇剖腹产的首要原因。产妇意愿是另一个新的剖腹产指征,占 7.6%。结论结果显示,多产妇的剖腹产发生率高于初产妇。同样,择期剖腹产率也高于急诊剖腹产率。产妇的意愿是剖腹产的另一个新的上升指征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信